PI網絡的陰謀與劃分一樣多

Pi網絡擁有超過4700萬用戶，與劃分一樣多。在一個移動優先的野心的驅動下，儘管被大量採用了這種加密貨幣，但在諸如Binance或Bybit之類的主要交流中仍然沒有。

Despite boasting over 47 million users and being a hot topic in the crypto sphere, Pi Network is notably absent from major exchanges like Binance or Bybit. This absence has sparked discussion about the transparency of the project and its strategic choices, especially in an age where centralized exchanges and institutional investors prioritize such standards.

儘管擁有超過4700萬用戶，並且是加密球體中的熱門話題，但PI網絡在Binance或Bybit等主要交易中也沒有。這種缺席引發了關於該項目及其戰略選擇的透明度的討論，尤其是在集中交易所和機構投資者優先考慮此類標準的時代。

While some reports suggest that Pi Network is in the process of applying for a listing on Binance, it seems unlikely to happen in the short term.

儘管一些報告表明PI網絡正在申請二元上市，但在短期內似乎不太可能發生。

One of the main obstacles to the listing of Pi Network on Binance or Bybit lies in a lack of clarity that some experts deem critical.

在Binance或Bybit上列出PI網絡的主要障礙之一在於缺乏明確性，一些專家認為至關重要。

Thus, analyst Dr. Altcoin claims on the social network X (formerly Twitter) on March 22, 2025, that “the core team has still not clearly defined the locking or burning mechanisms of tokens,” elements that are essential for the credibility of a blockchain project.

因此，分析師Altcoin博士於2025年3月22日在社交網絡X（以前為Twitter）上聲稱：“核心團隊仍未清楚地定義代幣的鎖定或燃燒機制，”這對於區塊鏈項目的信譽至關重要。

This opacity prevents platforms from accurately assessing the risks associated with the circulating supply, a criterion that has become essential in the era of increased regulation in the sector.

這種不透明度可防止平台準確評估與循環供應相關的風險，這一標准在該行業增加的監管時代至關重要。

Such mistrust has intensified with a recent decision that surprised observers: the removal of 10 million tokens from the network has reduced the circulating supply to 6.77 billion.

這種不信任的人加劇了最近的決定使觀察者感到驚訝：從網絡中刪除1000萬個令牌已將循環供應量減少到67.7億。

This complete lack of official justification has raised doubts about the intentions of the project team, as some suggest a manipulation of supply ahead of a potential token release.

這種完全缺乏官方理由引起了人們對項目團隊的意圖的懷疑，因為有人暗示在潛在的代幣釋放之前對供應進行操縱。

Exchange platforms, in search of solid and transparent projects, are cautious regarding this governance deemed too unilateral.

交換平台，尋找穩定和透明的項目，對這種治理被認為是單方面的謹慎。

Here are the main points of friction highlighted by analysts:

這是分析師突出顯示的摩擦的要點：

A strategic refusal of the entry standards of exchanges

戰略拒絕交流標準

Beyond economic uncertainties, the absence of Pi Network on Binance or Bybit could also be explained by a strategic choice of the project team. According to several sources, Pi Network would have declined the idea of paying the listing fees required by certain platforms.

除了經濟不確定性之外，還可以通過對項目團隊的戰略選擇來解釋缺少二手型或BYBIT的PI網絡。根據幾個消息來源，PI網絡將拒絕支付某些平台所需的上市費用的想法。

This decision would be motivated by the desire to preserve the independence of the project in relation to traditional business logics.

這一決定將是由於渴望與傳統商業邏輯相關的項目獨立性的願望。

“The refusal to comply with the financial demands of exchanges can be seen as an ethical position,” observes Dr. Altcoin. He reminds us that this stance is difficult to maintain in the face of the imperatives of transparency and crypto regulation.

Altcoin博士指出：“拒絕遵守交流的財務需求可以看作是道德立場。”他提醒我們，面對透明性和加密監管的必要性，這種立場很難保持。

Thus, this non-conformist attitude, while appealing to some members of the community, complicates the prospects for listing on major platforms.

因此，這種不符合文明主義的態度在吸引社區的某些成員的同時，使在主要平台上列出的前景變得複雜。

In the absence of listing on a recognized centralized exchange, the liquidity of the token remains limited, hindering any massive adoption or institutional speculation. Without integration into traditional trading circuits, can Pi Network surpass the experimental stage?

在沒有公認的集中交易所上市的情況下，令牌的流動性仍然有限，阻礙了任何大規模收養或機構投機。如果不整合到傳統交易電路中，PI網絡是否可以超過實驗階段？

The evolution of the project will likely depend on its ability to clarify its economic structure and to establish a more constructive dialogue with crypto exchange platforms such as Binance and ByBit. Otherwise, Pi could remain a promising yet marginal community project, on the periphery of a market where the demand for transparency has become the norm.

該項目的演變可能取決於其闡明其經濟結構並與加密交換平台（例如binance和Bybit）建立更具建設性的對話的能力。否則，PI可能仍然是一個有前途但邊緣的社區項目，在一個市場的外圍，對透明度的需求已成為常態。