PI网络的阴谋与划分一样多

Pi网络拥有超过4700万用户，与划分一样多。在一个移动优先的野心的驱动下，尽管被大量采用了这种加密货币，但在诸如Binance或Bybit之类的主要交流中仍然没有。

Despite boasting over 47 million users and being a hot topic in the crypto sphere, Pi Network is notably absent from major exchanges like Binance or Bybit. This absence has sparked discussion about the transparency of the project and its strategic choices, especially in an age where centralized exchanges and institutional investors prioritize such standards.

尽管拥有超过4700万用户，并且是加密球体中的热门话题，但PI网络在Binance或Bybit等主要交易中也没有。这种缺席引发了关于该项目及其战略选择的透明度的讨论，尤其是在集中交易所和机构投资者优先考虑此类标准的时代。

While some reports suggest that Pi Network is in the process of applying for a listing on Binance, it seems unlikely to happen in the short term.

尽管一些报告表明PI网络正在申请二元上市，但在短期内似乎不太可能发生。

One of the main obstacles to the listing of Pi Network on Binance or Bybit lies in a lack of clarity that some experts deem critical.

在Binance或Bybit上列出PI网络的主要障碍之一在于缺乏明确性，一些专家认为至关重要。

Thus, analyst Dr. Altcoin claims on the social network X (formerly Twitter) on March 22, 2025, that “the core team has still not clearly defined the locking or burning mechanisms of tokens,” elements that are essential for the credibility of a blockchain project.

因此，分析师Altcoin博士于2025年3月22日在社交网络X（以前为Twitter）上声称：“核心团队仍未清楚地定义代币的锁定或燃烧机制，”这对于区块链项目的信誉至关重要。

This opacity prevents platforms from accurately assessing the risks associated with the circulating supply, a criterion that has become essential in the era of increased regulation in the sector.

这种不透明度可防止平台准确评估与循环供应相关的风险，这一标准在该行业增加的监管时代至关重要。

Such mistrust has intensified with a recent decision that surprised observers: the removal of 10 million tokens from the network has reduced the circulating supply to 6.77 billion.

这种不信任的人加剧了最近的决定使观察者感到惊讶：从网络中删除1000万个令牌已将循环供应量减少到67.7亿。

This complete lack of official justification has raised doubts about the intentions of the project team, as some suggest a manipulation of supply ahead of a potential token release.

这种完全缺乏官方理由引起了人们对项目团队的意图的怀疑，因为有人暗示在潜在的代币释放之前对供应进行操纵。

Exchange platforms, in search of solid and transparent projects, are cautious regarding this governance deemed too unilateral.

交换平台，寻找稳定和透明的项目，对这种治理被认为是单方面的谨慎。

Here are the main points of friction highlighted by analysts:

这是分析师突出显示的摩擦的要点：

A strategic refusal of the entry standards of exchanges

战略拒绝交流标准

Beyond economic uncertainties, the absence of Pi Network on Binance or Bybit could also be explained by a strategic choice of the project team. According to several sources, Pi Network would have declined the idea of paying the listing fees required by certain platforms.

除了经济不确定性之外，还可以通过对项目团队的战略选择来解释缺少二手型或BYBIT的PI网络。根据几个消息来源，PI网络将拒绝支付某些平台所需的上市费用的想法。

This decision would be motivated by the desire to preserve the independence of the project in relation to traditional business logics.

这一决定将是由于渴望与传统商业逻辑相关的项目独立性的愿望。

“The refusal to comply with the financial demands of exchanges can be seen as an ethical position,” observes Dr. Altcoin. He reminds us that this stance is difficult to maintain in the face of the imperatives of transparency and crypto regulation.

Altcoin博士指出：“拒绝遵守交流的财务需求可以看作是道德立场。”他提醒我们，面对透明性和加密监管的必要性，这种立场很难保持。

Thus, this non-conformist attitude, while appealing to some members of the community, complicates the prospects for listing on major platforms.

因此，这种不符合文明主义的态度在吸引社区的某些成员的同时，使在主要平台上列出的前景变得复杂。

In the absence of listing on a recognized centralized exchange, the liquidity of the token remains limited, hindering any massive adoption or institutional speculation. Without integration into traditional trading circuits, can Pi Network surpass the experimental stage?

在没有公认的集中交易所上市的情况下，令牌的流动性仍然有限，阻碍了任何大规模收养或机构投机。如果不整合到传统交易电路中，PI网络是否可以超过实验阶段？

The evolution of the project will likely depend on its ability to clarify its economic structure and to establish a more constructive dialogue with crypto exchange platforms such as Binance and ByBit. Otherwise, Pi could remain a promising yet marginal community project, on the periphery of a market where the demand for transparency has become the norm.

该项目的演变可能取决于其阐明其经济结构并与加密交换平台（例如binance和Bybit）建立更具建设性的对话的能力。否则，PI可能仍然是一个有前途但边缘的社区项目，在一个市场的外围，对透明度的需求已成为常态。