CoinMarketCap上的PI網絡社區的情緒下降了90％

CoinMarketCap上的PI網絡社區在短短24小時內就使90％的情感下降了90％，使用戶感到困惑和關注。

The Pi Network community on CoinMarketCap saw a shocking 90% drop in sentiment in just 24 hours, leaving users confused and concerned. How did things turn so bad, so fast? Was it a natural shift, a mass sell-off, or something more suspicious?

CoinMarketCap上的PI網絡社區在短短24小時內就使90％的情感下降了90％，使用戶感到困惑和關注。事情如何變得如此糟糕，這麼快？這是自然的轉變，大規模拋售還是更可疑的東西？

Many believe bot activity could be behind the sudden crash, especially since Pi’s (PI) price also took a hit. But with no clear proof, the mystery has only deepened.

許多人認為，機器人活動可能是突然崩潰的幕後黑手，尤其是因為PI（PI）價格也受到了打擊。但是沒有明確的證據，這個謎只加深了。

Is this just another case of market volatility, or is something else at play? Let’s break it down.

這只是市場波動的另一種情況，還是其他事情正在發揮作用？讓我們分解。

Many users believe the drop was caused by large-scale sell-offs, but without any solid proof, the real reason remains unclear.

許多用戶認為下降是由大規模拋售引起的，但是沒有任何可靠的證據，真正的原因尚不清楚。

While there’s no direct evidence of bot activity, past cases of vote manipulation in the Pi Network community have sparked rumors and suspicions.

雖然沒有直接證據表明機器人活動，但PI網絡社區中過去的投票操縱案件引發了謠言和懷疑。

Since launching on February 20, Pi Network has faced constant scrutiny. Critics question its governance, transparency, and accessibility, while some governments have even labeled it a scam. Supporters, on the other hand, have been known to influence online polls and ratings in the project’s favor.

自2月20日推出以來，PI Network一直面臨不斷的審查。批評者質疑其治理，透明度和可及性，而一些政府甚至將其標記為騙局。另一方面，眾所周知，支持者會影響在線民意調查和收視率。

One community member on Telegram pointed out that Pi’s sentiment dropped drastically despite having more poll participants than Bitcoin (BTC). Yet, other platforms with similar voting systems, like TokenPocket and MyToken, showed no such decline. This inconsistency has led some to believe that bots may have been involved in the sudden drop.

電報上的一位社區成員指出，儘管比特幣（BTC）的民意調查參與者多，但Pi的情緒卻大幅下降。然而，其他具有類似投票系統的平台（例如Tokenpocket和MyToken）沒有顯示出如此下降。這種不一致使一些人相信機器人可能參與了突然的下降。

Just compare the difference. 77% of the $PI community is bullish on coingecko. Why is it so different on Coinmarket?Somebody is playing with the numbers. #PiNetwork https://t.co/seJPoBGoiq

只需比較差異即可。 $ PI社區中有77％是在Coingecko上看漲的。為什麼在Coinmarket上如此不同？有人在玩這些數字。 #pinetwork https://t.co/sejpobgoiq

— Niklas K.(C) / NFTSaver.CC (@NFTSaver) March 14, 2024

- Niklas K.（C） / nftsaver.cc（@nftsaver）2024年3月14日

Proving bot interference is difficult. Pi Network’s price has fallen sharply, and many users lost a significant number of tokens after missing the KYC migration deadline. At the same time, large sell-offs have contributed to the decline, so some of the negative sentiment could be real.

證明機器人干擾很困難。 PI Network的價格急劇下跌，許多用戶在缺少KYC遷移截止日期後失去了大量令牌。同時，大型拋售有助於下降，因此某些負面情緒可能是真實的。

What’s puzzling is that CoinMarketCap is the only platform where Pi’s sentiment crashed. The platform initially refused to list Pi as one of the largest tokens by market cap but later gave in. Some believe this past conflict might have influenced how the Pi community interacts with the platform.

令人困惑的是，CoinMarketCap是Pi情緒崩潰的唯一平台。該平台最初拒絕將PI列為市值最大的代幣之一，但後來又介紹了。有些人認為這過去的衝突可能影響了PI社區與平台的互動方式。

Pi Network supporters have organized mass voting campaigns before. When Bybit’s CEO criticized Pi, fans flooded the app with negative reviews. A similar incident happened with Binance when the exchange delayed Pi’s listing. Given this pattern, it’s unlikely that only genuine votes caused the sentiment drop.

PI網絡支持者以前曾組織大規模投票運動。當拜比特（Bybit）的首席執行官批評PI時，粉絲們對該應用程序充滿了負面評論。當交易所推遲Pi的上市時，Binance發生了類似的事件。鑑於這種模式，只有真正的投票才會導致情緒下降。

While bot activity is a possibility, there’s no concrete proof. The sudden wave of negative votes happened too quickly, was limited to one platform, and outpaced sentiment shifts for even the biggest cryptocurrencies. However, given the price crash and investor frustration, some of the negativity could be real. For now, the truth remains uncertain.

儘管機器人活動是可能的，但沒有具體的證明。突然的負票浪潮發生得太快了，僅限於一個平台，即使是最大的加密貨幣，情緒也會改變。但是，鑑於價格崩潰和投資者的挫敗感，一些消極情緒可能是真實的。就目前而言，事實仍然不確定。