CoinMarketCap上的PI网络社区的情绪下降了90％

CoinMarketCap上的PI网络社区在短短24小时内就使90％的情感下降了90％，使用户感到困惑和关注。

The Pi Network community on CoinMarketCap saw a shocking 90% drop in sentiment in just 24 hours, leaving users confused and concerned. How did things turn so bad, so fast? Was it a natural shift, a mass sell-off, or something more suspicious?

CoinMarketCap上的PI网络社区在短短24小时内就使90％的情感下降了90％，使用户感到困惑和关注。事情如何变得如此糟糕，这么快？这是自然的转变，大规模抛售还是更可疑的东西？

Many believe bot activity could be behind the sudden crash, especially since Pi’s (PI) price also took a hit. But with no clear proof, the mystery has only deepened.

许多人认为，机器人活动可能是突然崩溃的幕后黑手，尤其是因为PI（PI）价格也受到了打击。但是没有明确的证据，这个谜只加深了。

Is this just another case of market volatility, or is something else at play? Let’s break it down.

这只是市场波动的另一种情况，还是其他事情正在发挥作用？让我们分解。

Many users believe the drop was caused by large-scale sell-offs, but without any solid proof, the real reason remains unclear.

许多用户认为下降是由大规模抛售引起的，但是没有任何可靠的证据，真正的原因尚不清楚。

While there’s no direct evidence of bot activity, past cases of vote manipulation in the Pi Network community have sparked rumors and suspicions.

虽然没有直接证据表明机器人活动，但PI网络社区中过去的投票操纵案件引发了谣言和怀疑。

Since launching on February 20, Pi Network has faced constant scrutiny. Critics question its governance, transparency, and accessibility, while some governments have even labeled it a scam. Supporters, on the other hand, have been known to influence online polls and ratings in the project’s favor.

自2月20日推出以来，PI Network一直面临不断的审查。批评者质疑其治理，透明度和可及性，而一些政府甚至将其标记为骗局。另一方面，众所周知，支持者会影响在线民意调查和收视率。

One community member on Telegram pointed out that Pi’s sentiment dropped drastically despite having more poll participants than Bitcoin (BTC). Yet, other platforms with similar voting systems, like TokenPocket and MyToken, showed no such decline. This inconsistency has led some to believe that bots may have been involved in the sudden drop.

电报上的一位社区成员指出，尽管比特币（BTC）的民意调查参与者多，但Pi的情绪却大幅下降。然而，其他具有类似投票系统的平台（例如Tokenpocket和MyToken）没有显示出如此下降。这种不一致使一些人相信机器人可能参与了突然的下降。

Just compare the difference. 77% of the $PI community is bullish on coingecko. Why is it so different on Coinmarket?Somebody is playing with the numbers. #PiNetwork https://t.co/seJPoBGoiq

只需比较差异即可。 $ PI社区中有77％是在Coingecko上看涨的。为什么在Coinmarket上如此不同？有人在玩这些数字。 #pinetwork https://t.co/sejpobgoiq

— Niklas K.(C) / NFTSaver.CC (@NFTSaver) March 14, 2024

- Niklas K.（C） / nftsaver.cc（@nftsaver）2024年3月14日

Proving bot interference is difficult. Pi Network’s price has fallen sharply, and many users lost a significant number of tokens after missing the KYC migration deadline. At the same time, large sell-offs have contributed to the decline, so some of the negative sentiment could be real.

证明机器人干扰很困难。 PI Network的价格急剧下跌，许多用户在缺少KYC迁移截止日期后失去了大量令牌。同时，大型抛售有助于下降，因此某些负面情绪可能是真实的。

What’s puzzling is that CoinMarketCap is the only platform where Pi’s sentiment crashed. The platform initially refused to list Pi as one of the largest tokens by market cap but later gave in. Some believe this past conflict might have influenced how the Pi community interacts with the platform.

令人困惑的是，CoinMarketCap是Pi情绪崩溃的唯一平台。该平台最初拒绝将PI列为市值最大的代币之一，但后来又介绍了。有些人认为这过去的冲突可能影响了PI社区与平台的互动方式。

Pi Network supporters have organized mass voting campaigns before. When Bybit’s CEO criticized Pi, fans flooded the app with negative reviews. A similar incident happened with Binance when the exchange delayed Pi’s listing. Given this pattern, it’s unlikely that only genuine votes caused the sentiment drop.

PI网络支持者以前曾组织大规模投票运动。当拜比特（Bybit）的首席执行官批评PI时，粉丝们对该应用程序充满了负面评论。当交易所推迟Pi的上市时，Binance发生了类似的事件。鉴于这种模式，只有真正的投票才会导致情绪下降。

While bot activity is a possibility, there’s no concrete proof. The sudden wave of negative votes happened too quickly, was limited to one platform, and outpaced sentiment shifts for even the biggest cryptocurrencies. However, given the price crash and investor frustration, some of the negativity could be real. For now, the truth remains uncertain.

尽管机器人活动是可能的，但没有具体的证明。突然的负票浪潮发生得太快了，仅限于一个平台，即使是最大的加密货币，情绪也会改变。但是，鉴于价格崩溃和投资者的挫败感，一些消极情绪可能是真实的。就目前而言，事实仍然不确定。