彼得希夫再次引發爭議，將比特幣稱為“模因幣”

比特幣的長期批評者彼得·希夫（Peter Schiff）將比特幣稱為“迷因幣”，再次引發了爭議。他在社群媒體上分享的評論將比特幣比作流行的迷因加密貨幣

Peter Schiff, a renowned gold advocate and cryptocurrency skeptic, has reignited controversy by labeling Bitcoin a “meme coin.” In a recent post on social media, Schiff likened BTC to popular meme cryptocurrencies, blurring the line between the two. This remark has sparked fresh debates within the cryptocurrency community about the legitimacy of BTC.

著名的黃金倡導者和加密貨幣懷疑論者彼得·希夫（Peter Schiff）將比特幣標記為“迷因幣”，再次引發爭議。在社群媒體上最近的一篇文章中，希夫將 BTC 比作流行的迷因加密貨幣，模糊了兩者之間的界線。此言論在加密貨幣社群內引發了關於 BTC 合法性的新爭論。

Schiff's comments come after a CNBC interview where he criticized Bitcoin enthusiasts, such as Anthony Pompliano, for struggling to define meme coins. The gold advocate asserted that there is no clear distinction between BTC and meme cryptocurrencies, arguing that both categories lack tangible value. These comments are seen as a direct attack on BTC's reputation, a move that has enraged its proponents.

希夫是在接受 CNBC 採訪後發表此番言論的，他批評了安東尼·龐普里亞諾 (Anthony Pompliano) 等比特幣愛好者在定義模因幣方面的努力。這位黃金倡導者聲稱，BTC 和 meme 加密貨幣之間沒有明顯區別，並認為這兩個類別都缺乏有形價值。這些評論被視為對 BTC 聲譽的直接攻擊，此舉激怒了其支持者。

Throughout the years, Schiff has maintained his stance that BTC is purely speculative and akin to “fool's gold,” contrasting it with the physical properties of gold. He frequently highlights gold's historical role as real money, questioning BTC's ability to compete with it. Schiff's vocal criticisms of BTC began as early as 2011, contributing to his polarizing presence in financial discussions.

多年來，希夫一直堅持自己的立場，即比特幣純粹是投機性的，類似於“傻瓜黃金”，與黃金的物理特性形成鮮明對比。他經常強調黃金作為真實貨幣的歷史作用，質疑比特幣與其競爭的能力。希夫早在 2011 年就開始直言不諱地批評 BTC，這導致他在金融討論中的兩極分化。

Gold is real money. It's also says so in the U.S. Constitution. But gold's value comes from its tangible properties that resulted in it becoming money. Bitcoin is fool's gold.

黃金是真正​​的貨幣。美國憲法也是這麼說的。但黃金的價值來自其有形屬性，這導致它成為貨幣。比特幣是愚人金。

The rise of meme cryptocurrencies has added another layer of complexity to the cryptocurrency ecosystem. While some investors embrace the popularity of these coins, others argue that they ultimately harm the credibility of the industry. Traditional BTC supporters often attempt to distance themselves from these trends, emphasizing Bitcoin's more conservative and secure framework.

迷因加密貨幣的興起為加密貨幣生態系統增加了另一層複雜性。雖然一些投資者歡迎這些代幣的受歡迎，但其他投資者則認為它們最終會損害該行業的信譽。傳統的比特幣支持者經常試圖與這些趨勢保持距離，並強調比特幣更保守和安全的框架。

Schiff appears to be capitalizing on this divide, arguing that Bitcoin's close resemblance to meme coins highlights broader vulnerabilities within the crypto world. He suggests that efforts to differentiate Bitcoin only serve to amplify doubts about its long-term value. This assertion has drawn strong reactions from BTC advocates, who accuse Schiff of either fundamentally misunderstanding or deliberately misrepresenting BTC's purpose.

希夫似乎正在利用這種分歧，他認為比特幣與迷因硬幣的密切相似性凸顯了加密世界中更廣泛的漏洞。他認為，區分比特幣的努力只會加劇對其長期價值的懷疑。這一說法引起了 BTC 支持者的強烈反應，他們指責 Schiff 要么從根本上誤解了 BTC 的目的，要么故意歪曲了 BTC 的目的。

Ultimately, Schiff's criticisms are rooted in his loyalty to gold, which he believes holds intrinsic value that digital currencies lack. He regularly promotes gold as the ultimate financial safeguard, dismissing Bitcoin as a speculative hype. His frequent attacks on Bitcoin have led to accusations of self-promotion, with critics suggesting that Schiff uses the BTC discourse to maintain his presence in the spotlight.

最終，希夫的批評源自於他對黃金的忠誠，他認為黃金具有數位貨幣所缺乏的內在價值。他經常將黃金宣傳為最終的金融保障，並將比特幣視為投機炒作。他對比特幣的頻繁攻擊導致了自我推銷的指責，批評者認為希夫利用比特幣言論來維持自己在聚光燈下的存在。

Despite the criticism, Schiff maintains that his relevance precedes the creation of BTC, portraying himself as a consistent voice for traditional financial values. The clash between BTC advocates and gold supporters highlights a deeper divide in financial perspectives.

儘管受到批評，希夫堅稱自己的相關性早於比特幣的創建，並將自己描繪成傳統金融價值的一致代言人。比特幣支持者和黃金支持者之間的衝突凸顯了金融觀點上更深層的分歧。