市值: $2.6669T -1.190%
體積(24小時): $129.9898B 62.650%
  • 市值: $2.6669T -1.190%
  • 體積(24小時): $129.9898B 62.650%
  • 恐懼與貪婪指數:
  • 市值: $2.6669T -1.190%
加密
主題
加密植物
資訊
加密術
影片
頭號新聞
加密
主題
加密植物
資訊
加密術
影片
bitcoin
bitcoin

$83571.608249 USD

-1.38%

ethereum
ethereum

$1826.028236 USD

-3.02%

tether
tether

$0.999839 USD

-0.01%

xrp
xrp

$2.053149 USD

-2.48%

bnb
bnb

$601.140115 USD

-0.44%

solana
solana

$120.357332 USD

-3.79%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999833 USD

-0.02%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.166175 USD

-3.43%

cardano
cardano

$0.652521 USD

-3.00%

tron
tron

$0.236809 USD

-0.59%

toncoin
toncoin

$3.785339 USD

-5.02%

chainlink
chainlink

$13.253231 USD

-3.91%

unus-sed-leo
unus-sed-leo

$9.397427 USD

-0.19%

stellar
stellar

$0.266444 USD

-1.00%

sui
sui

$2.409007 USD

1.15%

加密貨幣新聞文章

MEXC在Kaspa爭議中清除了空氣 - 這就是為什麼社區不必擔心的原因

2025/04/02 15:10

上週,我們發表了兩篇文章,介紹了Kaspa社區有關MEXC暫停Kaspa提款的詳細信息

MEXC在Kaspa爭議中清除了空氣 - 這就是為什麼社區不必擔心的原因

Last week, we published 2 articles about the details from the Kaspa community concerns regarding MEXC’s suspension of Kaspa withdrawals, suspected price manipulation, and lack of transparency.

上週,我們發表了兩篇文章,介紹了Kaspa社區有關MEXC停止卡巴撤離,涉嫌價格操縱和缺乏透明度的細節的細節。

However, we got in touch with MEXC’s team who actually addressed all concerns and here’s why Kaspa community should stay calm.

但是,我們與MEXC的團隊取得了聯繫,後者實際上解決了所有問題,這就是為什麼Kaspa社區應該保持冷靜的原因。

Technical Challenges Behind the Withdrawal Suspension

退出停賽背後的技術挑戰

When MEXC paused Kaspa withdrawals on March 26th, it triggered alarm within the community. Many users expressed frustration over the sudden suspension, with Kaspa Report criticizing the exchange for not providing advanced notice to traders before restricting withdrawals.

3月26日,MEXC停止了Kaspa提款時,它觸發了社區內的警報。許多用戶對突然停職感到沮喪,Kaspa報告批評交易所在限制提款之前未向交易者提供高級通知。

In response to these concerns, MEXC issued an official statement explaining the technical reasons behind the suspension. As one of the first major exchanges to list Kaspa, MEXC handles exceptionally high transaction volumes, particularly from small mining-related deposits. This led to an accumulation of numerous micro UTXOs (unspent transaction outputs) and created processing bottlenecks and delays in transaction consolidation and withdrawals.

為了應對這些問題,MEXC發表了一份官方聲明,解釋了停職背後的技術原因。作為列出KASPA的首批主要交換之一,MEXC處理了異常高的交易量,尤其是與小型採礦相關的沉積物中。這導致了眾多微型UTXO(無需交易輸出)的積累,並在交易合併和提款中創建了處理瓶頸和延遲。

To address these issues long-term, MEXC’s technical team implemented a comprehensive system architecture redesign. This included migrating core functions like UTXO management from node wallets to their proprietary management system. The upgrade aimed to significantly improve processing capacity and service stability. During this essential maintenance, temporary restrictions on deposit and withdrawal services were necessary. This explains the periodic suspensions of KAS withdrawals. They concluded: “We understand the frustration caused by delayed withdrawals, and we deeply appreciate your patience and continued trust. ”

為了長期解決這些問題,MEXC的技術團隊實施了全面的系統體系結構。這包括遷移核心功能,例如UTXO管理從節點錢包到其專有管理系統。升級旨在顯著提高處理能力和服務穩定性。在這種基本維護期間,需要臨時限制存款和提款服務。這解釋了KAS撤回的定期停學。他們得出結論:“我們了解撤離延遲引起的挫敗感,我們非常感謝您的耐心和持續的信任。”

Asset Backing and Market Behavior Clarifications

資產支持和市場行為澄清

Some community members raised questions about MEXC’s asset backing and suggested Kraken as a more transparent alternative. However, MEXC has rejected these comparisons, noting that they appear to be attempts to discredit the exchange without presenting objective supporting data.

一些社區成員對MEXC的資產支持提出了疑問,並建議Kraken作為更透明的選擇。但是,MEXC拒絕了這些比較,並指出它們似乎是試圖在不提供客觀支持數據的情況下抹黑交換的嘗試。

The Kaspa price movement also became a point of contention. Prior to MEXC’s withdrawal halt, Kaspa had climbed nearly 50%. When the withdrawals stopped, the price flattened out. This led some community members to suspect something fishy was going on.

卡巴斯價格運動也成為爭論的點。在MEXC撤離停止之前,Kaspa攀升了近50%。當取款停止時,價格升起。這導致一些社區成員懷疑發生了一些可怕的事情。

MEXC clearly stated that no one has shown any real proof of market manipulation. An MEXC spokesperson said they don’t censor feedback and actually want to hear from users. “We’re open to criticism if it’s based on facts,” they said. Their rules aim to stop fake information and scams, not honest discussion.

MEXC清楚地指出,沒有人表現出任何真正的市場操縱證明。 MEXC發言人說,他們不審查反饋,實際上想听取用戶的意見。他們說:“如果基於事實,我們就會接受批評。”他們的規則旨在停止虛假信息和騙局,而不是誠實的討論。

MEXC talks regularly with many crypto communities, including Kaspa’s. They want users to share real concerns through proper channels.

MEXC定期與包括卡巴斯(Kaspa's)在內的許多加密社區進行交談。他們希望用戶通過適當的渠道分享真正的擔憂。

This whole situation shows the ongoing debate about centralized exchanges in the crypto world. Issues with transparency and communication happen across the industry, not just in this case.

整個情況表明,有關加密貨幣世界中集中交流的持續辯論。透明度和溝通的問題在整個行業中都存在,而不僅僅是在這種情況下。

MEXC turned Kaspa withdrawals back on March 28 after finishing their system upgrade. The exchange says they needed the pause to fix technical problems caused by too many small mining deposits overloading their processing system.

MEXC完成了系統升級後,將於3月28日撤回KASPA撤回。交易所表示,他們需要停頓以解決由於太多的礦業沉積物超載其加工系統而引起的技術問題。

While the suspension was just for technical reasons, it caused speculation and emotional reactions online – many based on incomplete information.

儘管暫停僅出於技術原因,但它引起了在線猜測和情感反應 - 許多基於不完整的信息。

免責聲明:info@kdj.com

所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!

如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。

2025年04月03日 其他文章發表於