機構投資者正在深入數字資產。但是隨著空間中更多的錢，安全風險增長

了解機構投資的鍊和鏈核審核有助於投資者保護資產，符合法規並避免欺詐。

The world of cryptocurrency has seen a massive influx of institutional investors, especially in 2025, marking a turning point in the integration of digital assets into the mainstream financial landscape. As this integration deepens, the importance of both on-chain and off-chain audits cannot be overstated.

加密貨幣世界已經大量湧入了機構投資者，尤其是在2025年，這標誌著數字資產集成到主流金融景觀中的轉折點。隨著這種整合的加深，鏈上和鏈審計的重要性都不能被誇大。

These audits serve as a fundamental safeguard, ensuring that the institutions engaging in crypto investments are equipped to navigate the unique landscape of digital assets, protect their assets, and meet the regulatory requirements imposed upon them.

這些審核是一種基本的保護措施，確保從事加密投資的機構有能力瀏覽數字資產的獨特景觀，保護其資產並滿足對它們施加的監管要求。

Institutions, in comparison to individual investors, typically handle significantly larger sums of money. This difference in scale is crucial. While individual investors might be able to stomach a smaller-scale error in judgment, a single mistake by an institution could have devastating consequences, potentially wiping out billions of dollars in an instant.

與個別投資者相比，機構通常處理更大的金錢。這種規模差異至關重要。儘管個人投資者可能能夠在判斷中遇到較小規模的錯誤，但機構的一個錯誤可能會帶來毀滅性的後果，並有可能立即消除數十億美元。

Institutions are also subject to a higher level of scrutiny, especially in terms of compliance with anti-money laundering (AML) regulations. This scrutiny is even more intense when an institution is operating in a less-regulated domain like crypto, making it imperative that they demonstrate adherence to the law.

機構還受到更高的審查，尤其是在遵守反洗錢（AML）法規方面。當一個機構在像加密貨幣這樣受監管的領域較低的領域運作時，這種審查更加嚴格，這使得他們必須表現出遵守法律的遵守。

The Structure of On-Chain and Off-Chain Audits

鍊和鏈審核的結構

On-chain audits concentrate on examining blockchain-based systems. They involve scanning transactions and smart contracts for any anomalies or signs of malicious activity. These audits are performed by professionals certified in cryptocurrency, such as the Certified Cryptocurrency Auditor™ (CCA), attesting to the solidity of the investment platforms and ensuring they adhere to the strictest compliance measures.

鏈上審核集中於檢查基於區塊鏈的系統。它們涉及掃描交易和智能合約，以了解任何異常或惡意活動的跡象。這些審核是由經過加密貨幣認證的專業人員進行的，例如認證的加密貨幣審核員™（CCA），證明了投資平台的穩固性，並確保他們遵守最嚴格的合規措施。

Without these certifications and specialized knowledge, institutions could be exposing themselves to vulnerabilities that could be easily detected by a professional with the right expertise.

沒有這些證書和專業知識，機構可能會使自己面臨具有正確專業知識的專業人員可以輕鬆檢測的漏洞。

In the realm of on-chain audits, the focus is on three key pillars:

在鏈上審核的領域中，重點是三個關鍵支柱：

* **Security:** Detecting any vulnerabilities in smart contracts or instances of funds being stolen from wallets.

***安全：**檢測智能合約中的任何漏洞或資金實例被錢包偷走。

* **Compliance:** Assessing whether the crypto company is adhering to AML regulations and other legal frameworks.

***合規性：**評估加密公司是否遵守AML法規和其他法律框架。

* **Trust:** Examining the reputation of the crypto firm and the level of confidence investors have in its activities.

***信任：**研究加密公司的聲譽以及投資者對其活動的信心水平。

The Importance of On-Chain Audits

鏈上審核的重要性

The need for on-chain audits is becoming increasingly urgent as North Korean hackers, in particular, have targeted crypto platforms with an alarming frequency. In 2024 alone, these hackers managed to steal $1.34 billion from crypto platforms, a figure that represents 61% of all the funds stolen from such platforms throughout the year.

隨著朝鮮黑客尤其是針對令人震驚的頻率的加密平台，對鏈上審計的需求變得越來越緊迫。僅在2024年，這些黑客就可以從加密貨幣平台上竊取13.4億美元，這一數字佔全年從此類平台中偷來的所有資金的61％。

A significant portion of these stolen funds were due to vulnerabilities in smart contracts, a factor that on-chain audits are uniquely positioned to highlight and rectify.

這些被盜的資金中很大一部分是由於智能合約中的脆弱性，這是鏈上審核的獨特位置以突出和糾正的因素。

In contrast to on-chain audits which focus on blockchain-based systems, off-chain audits delve into systems external to the blockchain. This includes examining exchanges, the status of hot and cold wallets, and an institution’s internal security policies.

與關注基於區塊鏈的系統的鏈上審核相反，鏈審核深入研究區塊鏈外部的系統。這包括檢查交流，冷藏錢包的狀況以及機構的內部安全政策。

Despite the growing awareness of on-chain security, these other areas are just as vulnerable, if not more so, than blockchain-based systems. For instance, a recent case involved Bitfinex being hacked, with the stolen Bitcoin taking years to track due to a lack of continuous monitoring and rapid reporting after the initial theft.

儘管對鏈上安全性的認識越來越大，但其他領域與基於區塊鏈的系統一樣脆弱，甚至更多。例如，最近的一個案件涉及黑客攻擊，由於缺乏持續的監測和初次盜竊後的持續監控和快速報告，被盜的比特幣需要數年的時間進行跟踪。

Finally, after persistent efforts by chain analytics firm Chainalysis, in cooperation with Bitfinex and a professional services firm, a significant portion of the stolen funds were recovered.

最後，在與Bitfinex和一家專業服務公司合作的連鎖分析公司鍊鍊分析的持續努力之後，收回了大部分被盜資金。

By 2025, the recovered Bitcoin from the Bitfinex hack alone amounted to approximately $3.6 billion, showcasing the potential scale of the losses that can be prevented with continuous off-chain auditing.

到2025年，僅Bitfinex黑客攻擊的比特幣總計約36億美元，展示了通過連續的脫鏈審計可以預防的損失的潛在規模。

The Role of Crypto Forensics

加密法證的作用

In both on-chain and off-chain audits, crypto forensics plays a crucial role. Using advanced analysis tools, crypto forensics can track suspicious activity, a capability that is becoming increasingly important as institutions, especially those in decentralized finance (DeFi), are engaging in new financial instruments and platforms.

在鍊和鏈審計中，加密法證都起著至關重要的作用。使用高級分析工具，加密法證可以跟踪可疑活動，這一能力越來越重要，因為機構，尤其是那些從事分散財務的機構（DEFI），正在從事新的金融工具和平台。

A striking example is the recent case of Celsius Network, a DeFi lending firm that went bankrupt in mid-2022. Before the collapse, executives at Celsius secretly moved over $300 million in Bitcoin to an exchange, intending to deceive investors and regulators with falsified reports.

一個驚人的例子是最近的塞爾斯網絡（Celius Network）的案例，塞爾斯（Celsius Network）是一家在2022年中期破產的貸款公司。在崩潰之前，塞爾西烏斯的高管秘密地將超過3億美元的比特幣轉移到了交易所，打算用偽造的報告欺騙投資者和監管機構。

However, crypto forensic tools managed to expose these transactions, leading to criminal charges against the executives for siphoning funds from investors and lying to both customers and regulators. This case vividly illustrates how forensic audits can protect investors from fraud and deception, especially in the less-regulated realm of DeFi.

但是，加密法證工具設法揭露了這些交易，導致對高管的刑事指控，要求投資者向客戶和監管機構撒謊。這個案件生動地說明了法醫審計如何保護投資者免受欺詐和欺騙的侵害，尤其是在不受限制的DEFI領域。

Institutions, especially in the West, are keenly aware of the need to balance transparency with customer privacy. This tension is particularly relevant in the context of anti-money laundering (AML) regulations.

機構，尤其是在西方的機構，敏銳地意識到需要在透明度與客戶隱私之間取得平衡。在反洗錢（AML）法規的背景下，這種張力尤其重要。

Institutions need to be able to demonstrate compliance with these regulations, but they also value the privacy of their customers' financial data. To navigate this balance, a promising technology is Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs).

機構需要能夠證明遵守這些法規，但它們也重視客戶財務數據的隱私。為了導致這種平衡，有希望的技術是零知識證明（ZKP）。

ZKPs allow institutions to prove financial transactions meet AML standards without revealing any personal or private details about the customer or the nature of the

ZKP允許機構證明金融交易符合AML標準，而無需透露有關客戶或性質的任何個人或私人詳細信息