市值: $3.1311T -3.310%
體積(24小時): $133.9404B 47.650%
  • 市值: $3.1311T -3.310%
  • 體積(24小時): $133.9404B 47.650%
  • 恐懼與貪婪指數:
  • 市值: $3.1311T -3.310%
Cryptos
主題
Cryptospedia
資訊
CryptosTopics
影片
Top News
Cryptos
主題
Cryptospedia
資訊
CryptosTopics
影片
bitcoin
bitcoin

$98433.185399 USD

1.59%

ethereum
ethereum

$2763.459218 USD

1.27%

xrp
xrp

$2.668025 USD

-0.54%

tether
tether

$1.000217 USD

0.02%

bnb
bnb

$653.708822 USD

0.95%

solana
solana

$175.851956 USD

2.55%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999920 USD

0.00%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.253731 USD

-0.29%

cardano
cardano

$0.797338 USD

1.97%

tron
tron

$0.250127 USD

5.04%

chainlink
chainlink

$18.347549 USD

1.13%

sui
sui

$3.505087 USD

6.65%

avalanche
avalanche

$25.192409 USD

5.07%

stellar
stellar

$0.339360 USD

-0.30%

litecoin
litecoin

$133.960706 USD

3.07%

加密貨幣新聞文章

海登·亞當斯(Hayden Adams)說,搞砸了令牌發射可能是故意的

2025/02/19 16:36

在最近在索拉納(Solana)上有爭議的模因硬幣中,Uniswap首席執行官海頓·亞當斯(Hayden Adams)施加了壓力,聲稱有缺陷的發射通常是故意的,而不是偶然的。

海登·亞當斯(Hayden Adams)說,搞砸了令牌發射可能是故意的

Uniswap CEO Hayden Adams has sparked further debate within the crypto community by claiming that flawed token launches are often intentional rather than accidental.

UNISWAP首席執行官海登·亞當斯(Hayden Adams)聲稱有缺陷的令牌發射通常是故意的,而不是偶然的。

His statement comes in light of recent high-profile token scandals, including the rise and fall of meme coins such as Libra and MELANIA.

他的聲明是根據最近引人注目的代幣醜聞來的,包括天秤座和梅拉尼亞等模因硬幣的興衰。

In a post on X (Twitter), Adams wrote, “It’s not that hard to do a good/fair token issuance. So if a token launch is messed up, it’s probably by design.”

亞當斯在X(Twitter)的一篇文章中寫道:“做一個好/公平的代幣發行並不難。因此,如果將令牌發布搞砸了,則可能是設計。”

Several members of the Web3 community have echoed similar sentiments in response to Adams’ statement. They argue that any serious crypto project should prioritize fairness.

Web3社區的幾個成員回應了類似的觀點,以回應亞當斯的聲明。他們認為,任何嚴重的加密項目都應優先考慮公平。

“Any serious company should do an auction token sale and launch with as much locked liquidity as possible,” highlighted one user.

一位用戶強調說:“任何嚴肅的公司都應進行拍賣令牌銷售,並儘可能多地鎖定流動性。”

However, the controversy also extended to Uniswap's governance token, UNI. Some have pointed out the irony that Uniswap, a decentralized exchange (DEX), has its governance token primarily traded on centralized exchanges (CEXes).

但是,爭議也擴展到了Uniswap的治理令牌,Uni。一些人指出,具有諷刺意味的是,分散的交易所(DEX)Uniswap的治理令牌主要在集中交易所(CEXES)上進行交易。

“We end up with the world’s biggest DEX token mostly traded on CEXes: Uniswap can’t even capture its own UNI volume,” noted one critic.

一位評論家指出:“我們最終以世界上最大的DEX代幣進行了交易:Uniswap甚至無法捕捉自己的Uni卷。”

Others have criticized Uniswap for not doing more to prevent unfair token launches. One X user stated that Uniswap could have implemented tools to stop exploitative practices, writing,

其他人則批評uniswap沒有做更多的事情來防止不公平的令牌發布。一個X用戶表示,UnisWap可以實施工具來停止剝削實踐,寫作,

“You’re up on your high horse while you always could prevent users from getting sandwiched or creating a fair launchpad with liquidity locked on Uniswap but you never did. What’s your excuse?”

“您一直踩著高馬,而您始終可以防止用戶被夾雜或創建公平的發射台,並在Uniswap上鎖定流動性,但您從來沒有這樣做。你的藉口是什麼?”

The push for more transparent and equitable launches is likely to intensify as more attention is paid to this issue. Both project teams and platforms like Uniswap will face increasing demands for greater accountability from investors.

隨著對這個問題的更多關注,推動更透明和公平的推出可能會加劇。諸如UNISWAP之類的項目團隊和平台都將面臨對投資者更大問責的需求。

免責聲明:info@kdj.com

所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!

如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。

2025年02月22日 其他文章發表於