Haliey Welch，更名為“ Hawk Tuah Girl”，聲稱已關閉SEC調查

Haliey Welch（眾所周知的“ Hawk Tuah Girl”）聲稱美國證券交易委員會（SEC）已關閉調查

Haliey Welch, famously known as the “Hawk Tuah girl,” has claimed that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has closed its investigation into her and the HAWK meme coin without pursuing any further enforcement actions.

Haliey Welch被稱為“ Hawk Tuah Girl”，他聲稱美國證券交易委員會（SEC）已經關閉了對她和Hawk Meme Coin的調查，而沒有採取任何進一步的執法行動。

However, the SEC themselves have not yet commented or confirmed this claim.

但是，SEC本身尚未發表評論或確認此主張。

The assertion follows the rapid rise of the HAWK token, which reportedly reached a $500 million market cap before crashing to below $60 million, leading to significant losses for many investors and sparking regulatory interest.

據報導，鷹令牌的迅速上升是在估計達到5億美元的市值之後的，然後墜毀至6000萬美元，這給許多投資者帶來了巨大的損失，並引發了監管權益。

Welch made the announcement regarding the alleged probe closure in an interview with TMZ.

韋爾奇在接受TMZ採訪時宣布了有關所謂的調查關閉的消息。

“For the past few months, I’ve been cooperating with all the authorities and attorneys, and finally, that work is complete,” Welch told TMZ.

韋爾奇告訴TMZ：“在過去的幾個月中，我一直在與所有當局和律師合作，最後，這項工作已經完成。”

Why Is The Claimed Outcome Sparking Controversy?

為什麼聲稱的結果引發了爭議？

Welch’s assertion that she faces no legal consequences concerning the HAWK token’s dramatic boom and bust has sparked controversy within the crypto community.

韋爾奇的斷言，她對鷹令牌的戲劇性繁榮和胸圍沒有任何法律後果，這引發了加密社區中的爭議。

Many have questioned how Welch can walk away without any legal repercussions despite the financial losses faced by investors as a result of the token’s crash. Critics argue that this situation highlights a gap in regulatory oversight, especially when it comes to high-risk projects like meme coins.

儘管由於令牌崩潰而造成了投資者面臨的財務損失，但許多人質疑韋爾奇如何在沒有任何法律影響的情況下走開。評論家認為，這種情況突出了監管監督的差距，尤其是在諸如Meme Coins之類的高風險項目方面。

Welch’s lawyer, James Sallah, added, “The SEC closed the investigation without making any findings against, or seeking any monetary sanctions from, Haliey. Because they did not bring any action against her, there are no restrictions on what she can do in regards to crypto or securities in the future.”

韋爾奇的律師詹姆斯·薩拉（James Sallah）補充說：“美國證券交易委員會（James Sallah）在沒有對哈里（Haliey）提出任何貨幣制裁的情況下結束了調查。由於他們沒有對她提起任何行動，因此對她對加密貨幣或證券的行為無限制。”

Related: Black Friday For Longs? $253 Million Wiped Out In 24 Hours Over Binance News

相關：黑色星期五渴望？ 2.23億美元在24小時內消失了

Is SEC Jurisdiction Limited For Meme Coins?

SEC管轄權有限限制模因硬幣嗎？

According to a legal analyst, James Murphy, who is known online as "MetaLawMan," it wouldn’t necessarily be surprising if the SEC probe was closed without any action being taken.

根據一位法律分析師的說法，在線被稱為“ Metalawman”的詹姆斯·墨菲（James Murphy），如果沒有採取任何行動，SEC調查已關閉，這並不一定會令人驚訝。

He suggested that meme coins are usually not classified as securities, which falls outside of the SEC’s jurisdiction.

他建議模因硬幣通常不歸類為證券，而證券不在SEC管轄範圍之內。

The agency is currently focusing on its core responsibilities, and if there was any fraud involved in the process, then criminal prosecutors or the state consumer protection agencies could investigate it further.

該機構目前正在關注其核心職責，如果該過程中涉及任何欺詐行為，則刑事檢察官或州消費者保護機構可以進一步調查。

No surprise. Meme coins are generally not securities, so no jurisdiction at the SEC. SEC is staying in its lane these days. If there was fraud associated with the launch, criminal prosecutors or the state consumer protection agency could/should be looking into it.

毫不奇怪。模因硬幣通常不是證券，因此在SEC中沒有管轄權。這些天，SEC一直在其車道上。如果與發射有關的欺詐行為，刑事檢察官或州消費者保護局可能會/應該調查。

For context, the SEC itself recently clarified that most meme coins don’t meet the criteria for investment contracts which the agency regulates, based on an established Supreme Court precedent.

在上下文中，SEC本身最近澄清說，大多數模因硬幣不符合基於既定最高法院先例的機構進行監管的投資合同的標準。

Related: Gemini, Binance Breach Claims Surface: Is Your Crypto Account Data At Risk?

相關：雙子座，Binance違反主張表面：您的加密帳戶數據是否處於危險之中？

While Welch and her lawyer claim that the SEC matter has been concluded favorably for her, the absence of any official statement or comment from the agency leaves the final status of the case unclear.

儘管韋爾奇（Welch）和她的律師聲稱SEC事務對她有利，但該機構的任何正式陳述或評論的缺乏使該案的最終地位尚不清楚。

As it stands, Welch is clear of any legal trouble, leaving the HAWK saga as yet another controversial chapter in the evolving landscape of cryptocurrency regulation.

就目前而言，韋爾奇沒有任何法律上的麻煩，這使霍克傳奇是不斷發展的加密貨幣監管環境中的另一個有爭議的章節。