Hailey “Hawk Tuah” Welch 和 $HAWK Memecoin 爭議：Rugpull 策劃者還是邪惡產業的受害者？

海莉·“Hawk Tuah”·韋爾奇並沒有通過最正統或最有信譽的方式建立自己的名字，但她的模因幣爭議已經掩蓋了她最初的“名氣”，至少在加密貨幣圈子裡是這樣。

Internet sleuth Coffeezilla joined the token's Twitter Spaces on December 5. When asked about "who made millions of dollars" from fees in the scheme, the project owners failed to adequately answer the question.

網路偵探 Coffeezilla 於 12 月 5 日加入了該代幣的 Twitter Spaces。

Towards the end of the stream, Welch signed off mid-conversation by saying, "Hey guys! I hate to interrupt you, Nick, but hello there. Anywhoo, I'm gonna go to bed and I'll see you guys tomorrow." This was the last time the public heard from Welch.

在直播即將結束時，韋爾奇在談話中結束時說道：“嘿夥計們！我不想打擾你們，尼克，但是你好。無論如何，我要去睡覺了，明天見。 ”這是公眾最後一次聽到韋爾奇的消息。

The team behind $HAWK, OverHere, resurfaced online on December 17, stating that its role was "unofficial" and "uncontracted" and received no fees nor profit from the launch.

$HAWK 背後的團隊 OverHere 於 12 月 17 日在網上重新露面，表示其角色是“非官方的”和“非簽約的”，並且沒有從此次發布中收取任何費用或利潤。

Instead, OverHere places the blame on Doc Hollywood who "controlled all token decisions, fees, treasury."

相反，OverHere 將責任歸咎於好萊塢博士，他「控制了所有像徵性的決定、費用和財務」。

"As community sentiment shifted, so did Doc Hollywood’s approach," OverHere claimed. "As desperation kicked in, participation conditions were progressively watered down. What started with plans for a lock-up eventually ended with none."

「隨著社區情緒的變化，好萊塢醫生的做法也發生了變化，」OverHere 聲稱。 “隨著絕望的到來，參與條件逐漸被淡化。從鎖定計劃開始的計劃最終以無果而終。”

1/ The Truth: We Only Built Airdrop Tech for Web2 Fans, for FreeWe saw $HAWK as the perfect use case for our startup’s idea: to bring airdrops to web2.

1/ 真相：我們只為 Web2 粉絲建立免費的空投技術我們認為 $HAWK 是我們新創公司想法的完美用例：將空投引入 web2。

Hailey Welch—a literal meme—launching a meme coin felt like synchronicity.Our goal was simple: bring Web2 fans into Web3…

Hailey Welch——一個字面上的迷因——推出迷因硬幣感覺就像同步性。

OverHere claimed it trusted the wrong partners, stayed too long to try to fix others' messes and admitted it should have spoken up sooner.

OverHere 聲稱它信任了錯誤的合作夥伴，停留了太久才試圖解決別人的爛攤子，並承認它應該早點說出來。

The firm also ended its long thread by tweeting Welch directly, stating "Ready when you are, @HalieyWelchX."

該公司還直接在韋爾奇的推特上結束了長篇帖子，稱“準備好了，@HalieyWelchX”。

If you felt a legal battle bubbling underneath all the chatter, you were right. Legal firm Burwick Law has filed a lawsuit on behalf of investors against $HAWK creators.

如果你覺得所有的爭論背後都在醞釀著一場法律鬥爭，那麼你是對的。 Burwick Law 律師事務所代表投資者對 $HAWK 創作者提起訴訟。

Soon after the scandal erupted, Burwick Law posted on X urging HAWK buyers affected by the recent price drop to come forward and explore the possibility of legal action.

醜聞爆發後不久，Burwick Law 在 X 上發帖，敦促受近期價格下跌影響的 HAWK 買家挺身而出，探討採取法律行動的可能性。

Two weeks later, the firm filed a lawsuit on behalf of 12 U.S.-based plaintiffs, who collectively allege losses exceeding $151,000.

兩週後，該公司代表 12 名美國原告提起訴訟，他們總共聲稱損失超過 151,000 美元。

Burwick Law filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of investors in the HAWK TUAH memecoin, $HAWK. Learn more below. pic.twitter.com/ChKYhjBGf1

Burwick Law 代表 HAWK TUAH memecoin $HAWK 的投資者提起了聯邦訴訟。下面了解更多。 pic.twitter.com/ChKYhjBGf1

“Haliey Welch may finally wake up in response to today’s lawsuit filed by investors against the HAWK Team, alleging they marketed and sold an unregistered security,” crypto-centric attorney Carlo D'Angelo, who is unaffiliated with this case, told Decrypt.

與此案無關的加密貨幣律師 Carlo D’Angelo 告訴 Decrypt，“Haliey Welch 可能最終會醒來，回應投資者今天對 HAWK 團隊提起的訴訟，指控他們營銷和出售未經註冊的證券。”

"The lawsuit is not at all surprising, given the amount of attention both the token launch and its immediate pump and crash have drawn.

「考慮到代幣的推出及其立即的上漲和崩盤所引起的廣泛關注，這起訴訟一點也不令人驚訝。

“This lawsuit highlights the risks associated with the marketing of alleged 'pump-and-dump' meme coins.” D'Angelo added.

“這起訴訟凸顯了與所謂‘拉高拋售’模因幣營銷相關的風險。”德安吉洛補充道。

“For celebrities and influencers, the lawsuit serves as a stark reminder that lending one's name and brand to cryptocurrency projects carries significant legal and reputational risks.”

“對於名人和有影響力的人來說，這起訴訟清楚地提醒我們，將自己的名字和品牌借給加密貨幣項目會帶來重大的法律和聲譽風險。”

The complaint names Alex Larson Schultz, who has been identified as Doc Hollywood, OverHere Limited, Clinton So, and Tuah the Moon Foundation as the four defendants.

訴狀將亞歷克斯·拉爾森·舒爾茨 (Alex Larson Schultz) 列為四名被告，他是 Doc Hollywood、OverHere Limited、Clinton So 和 Tuah the Moon Foundation。

Welch might be the face of the "Hawk Tuah" phenomenon but it's clear that there were many parties involved in making the $HAWK token such a phenomenal failure. Doc Hollywood and OverHere seem to be the most culpable but listed defendants Clinton So and Tuah the Moon Foundation suggest that more names will be dragged through the mud.

韋爾奇可能是「Hawk Tuah」現象的代言人，但很明顯，有很多方參與了 $HAWK 代幣如此驚人的失敗。 Doc Hollywood 和 OverHere 似乎是罪魁禍首，但名單上的被告 Clinton So 和 Tuah the Moon 基金會表示，更多的名字將會被拖入泥沼。

As for Welch, ignorance of memecoin mechanics might be her truth but her lack of responsibility in lending out her brand to fraudsters could also land her in hot water. Sympathy for ignorance only goes so far.

至於韋爾奇，對迷因幣機制的無知可能是她的真相，但她在將自己的品牌借給詐欺者方面缺乏責任也可能讓她陷入困境。對無知的同情只能到此為止。

The whole saga is yet another warning of memecoin dangers and that Web2 branding doesn't necessarily translate well to Web3 projects.

整個傳奇故事再次警告了 memecoin 的危險，而 Web2 品牌不一定能很好地轉化為 Web3 專案。