福布斯的「殭屍」加密貨幣分類引發了關於效用和投機的爭論

《富比士》最近的一項調查將幾種加密貨幣標記為“殭屍”，因為據稱它們“用戶很少”，這引發了卡爾達諾遠見卓識的查爾斯·霍斯金森(Charles Hoskinson) 的詼諧回應。霍斯金森分享了《南方公園》中的殭屍動畫，暗示這類“殭屍”擁有“全腦”，這顯然是在暗指《福布斯》。這一集凸顯了加密貨幣創造者和媒體之間持續的緊張關係，以及像霍斯金森這樣的人物捍衛他們的項目的決心。

Cryptocurrency Market Roiled by 'Zombie' Classification, Sparking Debate on Utility and Speculation

加密貨幣市場因「殭屍」分類而動盪，引發關於效用和投機的爭論

A recent investigation by Forbes has ignited a heated debate within the cryptocurrency ecosystem, labeling several prominent platforms as "zombies" due to alleged low user engagement. Among the platforms so designated are Cardano, Tezos, Litecoin, Algorand, Monero, Ripple, and others.

福布斯最近的一項調查引發了加密貨幣生態系統內的激烈爭論，由於據稱用戶參與度低，幾個著名平台被貼上「殭屍」標籤。指定的平台包括 Cardano、Tezos、Litecoin、Algorand、Monero、Ripple 等。

Forbes' Classification and Criticism

福布斯的分類與批評

The Forbes article, published on March 27, 2024, identifies approximately 50 cryptocurrencies currently trading at valuations exceeding $1 billion, with at least 20 classified as "functional zombies." The report lambasts these blockchains as having "little utility" beyond speculative trading, despite accumulating substantial treasuries and remaining unaccountable to shareholders or regulators.

福布斯 2024 年 3 月 27 日發表的文章指出，目前約有 50 種加密貨幣的交易估值超過 10 億美元，其中至少 20 種被歸類為「功能性殭屍」。該報告痛斥這些區塊鏈除了投機交易之外“沒有什麼用處”，儘管它們積累了大量資金並且對股東或監管機構不負責任。

Cardano under Scrutiny

卡爾達諾受到審查

Cardano, in particular, became a focal point of criticism. The article notes that despite generating $3 million in fees over the past year, the Cardano Foundation acknowledges that it has yet to complete its development stages. Forbes also raises questions regarding Charles Hoskinson, Cardano's visionary founder, detailing his investments in a Wyoming ranch, alien hunting expeditions, and a center for regenerative and anti-aging medicine.

卡爾達諾尤其成為批評的焦點。文章指出，儘管過去一年產生了 300 萬美元的費用，卡爾達諾基金會承認它尚未完成其開發階段。福布斯也對卡爾達諾富有遠見的創始人查爾斯霍斯金森提出了質疑，詳細介紹了他對懷俄明州牧場、外星人狩獵探險以及再生和抗衰老醫學中心的投資。

Hoskinson's Witty Response

霍斯金森的機智回應

Undeterred, Charles Hoskinson responded with a tongue-in-cheek tweet, sharing an animated clip from the popular television series "South Park" featuring a horde of zombies. The caption accompanying the tweet, which included references to Bitcoin Cash, Stellar, and Ethereum Classic, suggests that these "zombies" are, in fact, "all brains," a veiled dig at Forbes' characterization.

查爾斯·霍斯金森並沒有被嚇倒，他在推特上半開玩笑地回應，分享了流行電視劇《南方公園》中一群殭屍的動畫片段。推文附帶的標題包括對比特幣現金、Stellar 和以太坊經典的提及，表明這些“殭屍”實際上是“全腦”，這是對福布斯特徵的含蓄挖苦。

Hoskinson's Tweet:

霍斯金森的推文：

"Hey guys @tezos @Algorand @bitcoincasorg @Ripple_XRP1 @StellarOrg @BobSummerwill, we are all Crypto Zombies according to Forbes. I guess it's because we got all the 🧠! pic.twitter.com/nwKbf7R4Pb"

“嘿夥計們@tezos @Algorand @bitcoincasorg @Ripple_XRP1 @StellarOrg @BobSummerwill，根據福布斯的說法，我們都是加密殭屍。我想這是因為我們得到了所有🧠！pic.twitter.com/nwKbf7R4Pb”

Debate on Speculation vs. Utility

投機與實用之爭

The "zombie" classification has reignited a long-standing debate within the cryptocurrency market. Critics argue that many platforms, including those deemed "functional zombies," are primarily driven by speculative trading rather than genuine utility. Advocates, on the other hand, maintain that these platforms have the potential to revolutionize various industries, such as finance, supply chain management, and healthcare.

「殭屍」分類重新引發了加密貨幣市場內長期存在的爭論。批評者認為，許多平台，包括那些被視為「功能性殭屍」的平台，主要是由投機交易而非真正的效用所驅動的。另一方面，支持者認為這些平台有潛力徹底改變各個產業，例如金融、供應鏈管理和醫療保健。

Resilience of Cryptocurrency Market

加密貨幣市場的彈性

Hoskinson's witty response to Forbes' criticism underscores the resilience of the cryptocurrency market, where developers and advocates remain steadfast in their belief in the transformative potential of these technologies. The debate surrounding "zombie" coins highlights the ongoing tension between speculation and innovation within the ecosystem.

霍斯金森對福布斯批評的機智回應強調了加密貨幣市場的彈性，開發人員和倡導者仍然堅信這些技術的變革潛力。圍繞著「殭屍」硬幣的爭論凸顯了生態系統內投機與創新之間持續存在的緊張關係。

Historical Parallel to Bitcoin Criticism

與比特幣批評的歷史相似之處

The controversy surrounding "zombie" cryptocurrencies bears striking similarities to the frequent declarations of Bitcoin's demise. Since 2010, Bitcoin has been pronounced "dead" 476 times, a testament to the volatility and resilience of the cryptocurrency market.

圍繞「殭屍」加密貨幣的爭議與頻繁宣布的比特幣消亡有著驚人的相似之處。自2010年以來，比特幣已被宣告「死亡」476次，證明了加密貨幣市場的波動性和彈性。

Conclusion

結論

The "zombie" classification of certain cryptocurrencies has sparked a heated debate on the utility and speculative nature of these technologies. While critics question the value of platforms with low user engagement, advocates remain optimistic about their potential for innovation. The controversy highlights the ongoing evolution and maturation of the cryptocurrency market, where the search for true value and innovation continues to drive passionate discussions among both supporters and detractors.

某些加密貨幣的「殭屍」分類引發了關於這些技術的實用性和投機性質的激烈爭論。儘管批評者質疑用戶參與度低的平台的價值，但倡議者仍然對其創新潛力持樂觀態度。這場爭議凸顯了加密貨幣市場的不斷發展和成熟，對真正價值和創新的追求繼續推動支持者和反對者之間的熱烈討論。