福布斯敲響警鐘：20條區塊鏈被稱為“殭屍鏈”，引發激烈爭論

在動態的加密貨幣格局中，《富比士》公佈了 20 個「殭屍鏈」列表，即市場價值高但實際效用或用戶採用率極低的項目。儘管 XRP、Cardano、Algorand 和 Fantom 等區塊鏈聲稱擁有技術進步，但它們未能展現出重大的實際實施或廣泛接受。

Forbes Declares 20 Blockchains "Zombie Chains," Sparking Debate

福布斯宣布 20 條區塊鏈為“殭屍鏈”，引發爭議

In a bombshell report that has sent shockwaves through the cryptocurrency community, Forbes has identified 20 blockchains as "zombie chains," projects that have failed to achieve significant real-world utility despite commanding colossal market values. This exposé has ignited fierce debate, with industry experts questioning the validity of Forbes's claims and lambasting the report as a sensationalist attempt to undermine the integrity of the blockchain ecosystem.

在一份震驚加密貨幣界的爆炸性報告中，《福布斯》將 20 個區塊鏈認定為“殭屍鏈”，這些項目儘管擁有巨大的市場價值，但未能在現實世界中實現顯著的效用。這次曝光引發了激烈的爭論，行業專家質疑福布斯聲明的有效性，並痛斥該報告是企圖破壞區塊鏈生態系統完整性的聳人聽聞的行為。

According to Forbes, these "zombie" chains are characterized by a glaring disconnect between their high market valuations and their negligible utility in the real world. They are merely tokens that thrive solely on speculative trading and substantial initial funding rather than any meaningful technological advancements or practical applications.

根據《富比士》報道，這些「殭屍」連鎖店的特點是其高市場估值與現實世界中微不足道的效用之間存在明顯脫節。它們只是僅靠投機交易和大量初始資金而不是任何有意義的技術進步或實際應用而繁榮的代幣。

Ripple's XRP, once hailed as a revolutionary competitor to SWIFT, now finds itself languishing in the "zombie" category. Forbes argues that XRP has failed to dethrone SWIFT and is now heavily reliant on speculative trading for its lofty market value. Despite its reputation as a "largely useless" token, XRP still boasts a staggering market capitalization of $36 billion, making it the sixth most valuable cryptocurrency.

Ripple的XRP曾經被譽為SWIFT的革命性競爭對手，現在卻發現自己陷入了「殭屍」類別。 《富比士》認為，XRP 未能取代 SWIFT，目前其高昂的市值嚴重依賴投機交易。儘管 XRP 被譽為「基本上無用」的代幣，但其市值仍高達 360 億美元，使其成為第六大最有價值的加密貨幣。

Other notable "zombie" chains include Cardano, Litecoin, Ethereum Classic, and the so-called "Ethereum killers" such as Tezos and Algorand. Forbes contends that these projects have failed to gain significant traction or user adoption despite their technological advancements and hefty market valuations.

其他著名的「殭屍」鏈包括卡爾達諾、萊特幣、以太坊經典，以及 Tezos 和 Algorand 等所謂的「以太坊殺手」。福布斯認為，儘管這些項目技術先進且市場估值很高，但它們未能獲得顯著的吸引力或用戶採用。

The inclusion of Fantom, Internet Computer, and Monero in Forbes's list has raised particular eyebrows within the cryptocurrency community. Fantom has recently made significant strides in the DeFi space, collaborating with Circle to launch their own bridged USDC.e. Internet Computer, once touted as a potential game-changer, has admittedly faced challenges but remains a promising project with a dedicated team working tirelessly to improve its functionality. Monero, known for its privacy-centric features, continues to attract a loyal user base and has made substantial technical improvements.

Fantom、Internet Computer 和 Monero 被列入《富比士》榜單，引起了加密貨幣社群的特別關注。 Fantom 最近在 DeFi 領域取得了重大進展，與 Circle 合作推出了自己的橋接 USDC.e。網路電腦曾經被吹捧為潛在的遊戲規則改變者，誠然面臨著挑戰​​，但仍然是一個充滿希望的項目，有一個專門的團隊孜孜不倦地努力改進其功能。門羅幣以其以隱私為中心的功能而聞名，持續吸引忠實的用戶群，並取得了實質的技術改進。

Critics of Forbes's report have accused the publication of spreading FUD (fear, uncertainty, and doubt) and engaging in sensationalism at the expense of the truth. They argue that Forbes has cherry-picked data and ignored key metrics that paint a more positive picture of the blockchain ecosystem.

《富比士》報告的批評者指責該報告傳播 FUD（恐懼、不確定性和懷疑）並以犧牲事實為代價來追求轟動效應。他們認為，《富比士》精挑細選的數據，忽略了描繪區塊鏈生態系統更正面畫面的關鍵指標。

Furthermore, they contend that the notion of "zombie chains" is highly subjective and fails to acknowledge the potential for future growth and innovation. They point to examples of projects that have rebounded from periods of stagnation to become thriving blockchain networks.

此外，他們認為「殭屍鏈」的概念非常主觀，未能認識到未來成長和創新的潛力。他們舉了一些項目的例子，這些項目從停滯期反彈，成為蓬勃發展的區塊鏈網路。

The debate sparked by Forbes's report is likely to continue for some time. While it is undeniable that some blockchain projects have failed to live up to their initial hype, dismissing them as "zombies" may be premature and shortsighted. The true measure of the health and longevity of a blockchain project lies in its ability to adapt, innovate, and provide genuine value to its users. Only time will tell which projects will emerge from this crypto winter as true survivors and which will ultimately succumb to the relentless march of progress.

福布斯報告引發的爭論可能會持續一段時間。雖然不可否認，一些區塊鏈項目未能達到最初的炒作，但將它們視為「殭屍」可能為時過早且短視。區塊鏈專案健康和長壽的真正衡量標準在於其適應、創新和為用戶提供真正價值的能力。只有時間才能告訴我們哪些項目將從這個加密貨幣冬天中脫穎而出，成為真正的倖存者，哪些項目最終將屈服於不斷進步的步伐。