bitcoin
bitcoin

$101385.148803 USD

2.40%

ethereum
ethereum

$3655.099092 USD

0.26%

xrp
xrp

$2.450190 USD

2.73%

tether
tether

$0.999930 USD

0.03%

bnb
bnb

$728.224706 USD

1.33%

solana
solana

$215.160865 USD

-0.09%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.392580 USD

1.53%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999927 USD

-0.01%

cardano
cardano

$1.147312 USD

6.31%

tron
tron

$0.270150 USD

2.62%

avalanche
avalanche

$43.519751 USD

-1.67%

sui
sui

$5.165618 USD

-0.32%

chainlink
chainlink

$23.406207 USD

-0.67%

toncoin
toncoin

$5.712578 USD

0.38%

shiba-inu
shiba-inu

$0.000024 USD

0.30%

加密貨幣新聞文章

Drake 因在 Diss Track 中未經授權使用人工智慧產生的 Tupac 語音而被起訴

2024/04/25 11:10

德雷克(Drake) 面臨法律訴訟,圖帕克(Tupac) 的遺產管理機構威脅要對德雷克(Drake) 在他的diss 歌曲“泰勒製造”(Taylor Made) 中未經授權使用人工智能生成的聲音提起訴訟。這起事件凸顯了音樂產業中科技與智慧財產權的交叉,引發了人們對未經適當授權在創意作品中使用人工智慧產生的聲音所產生的道德和法律影響的擔憂。

Drake 因在 Diss Track 中未經授權使用人工智慧產生的 Tupac 語音而被起訴

Drake Faces Legal Action over Unauthorized Use of AI-Generated Tupac Voice in "Taylor Made" Diss Track

Drake 因在「Taylor Made」Diss 曲目中未經授權使用人工智慧產生的 Tupac 語音而面臨法律訴訟

San Francisco, CA - June 28, 2024: Drake's latest diss track, "Taylor Made," has sparked a legal battle with the estate of legendary rapper Tupac Shakur, raising questions about the ethical and legal implications of using AI-generated voices in creative works.

加州舊金山- 2024 年6 月28 日:Drake 的最新diss 歌曲“Taylor Made”引發了一場與傳奇說唱歌手Tupac Shakur 遺產的法律糾紛,引發了關於在創意中使用人工智能生成的聲音的道德和法律影響的問題作品。

Allegations of Copyright Infringement

侵犯版權的指控

Tupac's legal team, led by attorney Howard King, has threatened a lawsuit against Drake for unauthorized use of Tupac's voice in "Taylor Made." The estate claims that Drake violated their intellectual property rights by using an AI-generated soundalike without their consent.

由律師霍華德金 (Howard King) 領導的圖帕克 (Tupac) 法律團隊威脅要對德雷克 (Drake) 提起訴訟,指控其在《泰勒製造》中未經授權使用圖帕克 (Tupac) 的聲音。遺產委員會聲稱,德雷克在未經他們同意的情況下使用人工智慧生成的聲音侵犯了他們的智慧財產權。

"We are deeply disappointed and dismayed by Drake's unauthorized utilization of Tupac's voice and persona," King said in a statement. "The Shakur Estate would never have approved such a disrespectful and exploitative use of Tupac's legacy."

金在一份聲明中表示:“我們對德雷克未經授權使用圖帕克的聲音和形象深感失望。” “沙庫爾莊園永遠不會批准對圖帕克的遺產進行如此不尊重和剝削的使用。”

King indicated that the legal team is prepared to pursue legal action if the song remains accessible online.

金表示,如果這首歌仍然可以在網路上訪問,法律團隊準備採取法律行動。

Intersection of Technology, Art, and Intellectual Property

技術、藝術和知識產權的交叉點

The case highlights the complex intersection of technology, artistic expression, and intellectual property rights in the music industry. As AI technologies advance, the use of AI-generated voices in music has become increasingly prevalent, raising questions about copyright and fair use.

該案凸顯了音樂產業中技術、藝術表達和智慧財產權的複雜交叉。隨著人工智慧技術的進步,人工智慧生成的聲音在音樂中的使用變得越來越普遍,引發了有關版權和合理使用的問題。

The music industry faces a challenge in balancing the use of AI-generated voices to enhance artistic expression with the protection of intellectual property rights.

音樂產業面臨著平衡使用人工智慧產生的聲音來增強藝術表達與保護智慧財產權的挑戰。

Feud and Controversy

不和與爭議

"Taylor Made" is part of a series of diss tracks exchanged between Drake and other rappers, including Lamar and Future. These exchanges have stirred controversy and drawn significant attention.

《Taylor Made》是 Drake 和其他饒舌歌手(包括 Lamar 和 Future)之間交換的一系列 diss 曲目的一部分。這些交流引起了爭議並引起了廣泛關注。

While Drake's song has been met with enthusiasm by some fans, it has also drawn criticism for its perceived disrespectful treatment of Tupac's legacy.

雖然德雷克的歌曲受到了一些歌迷的熱情歡迎,但它也因其對圖帕克遺產的不尊重而受到批評。

Industry Response

業界反應

The use of AI-generated music has prompted debate within the music industry. Record labels are exploring strategies to address the trend and ensure that intellectual property rights are protected.

人工智慧生成音樂的使用引發了音樂產業內的爭論。唱片公司正在探索應對這一趨勢並確保智慧財產權受到保護的策略。

Drake's Response

德雷克的回應

Drake has yet to respond publicly to the legal threats from Tupac's estate. However, sources close to the rapper indicate that he may pursue legal action to defend his position.

德雷克尚未對圖帕克遺產的法律威脅做出公開回應。然而,接近這位說唱歌手的消息人士表示,他可能會採取法律行動來捍衛自己的立場。

The outcome of the legal battle will have significant implications for the use of AI-generated voices in music and the boundaries of intellectual property rights in the digital age.

這場法律戰的結果將對人工智慧產生的聲音在音樂中的使用以及數位時代的知識產權邊界產生重大影響。

免責聲明:info@kdj.com

The information provided is not trading advice. kdj.com does not assume any responsibility for any investments made based on the information provided in this article. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and it is highly recommended that you invest with caution after thorough research!

If you believe that the content used on this website infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately (info@kdj.com) and we will delete it promptly.

2025年01月07日 其他文章發表於