Consensys 在具有里程碑意義的訴訟中正面迎擊 SEC 對以太坊的攻擊

以太坊的主要支持者 Consensys 正在起訴美國證券交易委員會 (SEC)，指控其試圖將以太坊 (ETH) 作為證券進行監管，從而越權。此舉是更廣泛的行業抵制加密貨幣公司和組織認為過度熱情監管的一部分。 Consensys 正在尋求監管澄清 ETH 是否是一種商品、其受歡迎的以太坊錢包是否構成經紀業務，以及保護開發商免受 SEC 執法的影響。

Consensys' Bold Stand Against SEC's Assault on Ethereum: A Comprehensive Examination

Consensys 大膽反對 SEC 對以太坊的攻擊：全面檢查

Amidst the ongoing regulatory turbulence in the crypto industry, Consensys, a leading Ethereum development company, has emerged as a formidable adversary to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Citing regulatory overreach, Consensys has filed a lawsuit against the SEC, seeking clarity on Ethereum's status and challenging the agency's authority over the second-largest blockchain by market capitalization.

在加密產業持續的監管動盪中，領先的以太坊開發公司 Consensys 已成為美國證券交易委員會 (SEC) 的強大對手。 Consensys 以監管過度為由，對 SEC 提起訴訟，尋求澄清以太坊的地位，並挑戰該機構對市值第二大區塊鏈的權威。

Consensys' Argument: Ethereum Is Not a Security

Consensys 的論點：以太坊不是證券

Central to Consensys' lawsuit is the assertion that Ethereum (ETH) does not meet the SEC's criteria for classification as a security. According to the complaint filed in a Texas court, ETH lacks the characteristics of a security, as defined by the Supreme Court's Howey test.

Consensys 訴訟的核心是聲稱以太幣（ETH）不符合 SEC 的證券分類標準。根據向德州法院提交的訴狀，ETH 缺乏最高法院 Howey 測試所定義的證券特徵。

Moreover, Consensys contends that the SEC had previously stated that ETH is not a security, both in 2018 and 2021. The company argues that the SEC's current stance constitutes an unlawful reversal of its previous position, causing significant harm to the Ethereum ecosystem and the crypto industry as a whole.

此外，Consensys 認為 SEC 先前曾在 2018 年和 2021 年表示 ETH 不是證券。

SEC's Investigation and Consensys' Response

SEC 的調查和 Consensys 的回應

The SEC's investigation into Ethereum and its developers has raised concerns within the crypto community. Consensys' complaint reveals that the company has received multiple subpoenas and a Wells Notice, indicating the SEC's intent to file charges. The SEC has sought information about Consensys' operations, ETH holdings, and involvement in Ethereum's transition to proof-of-stake.

美國證券交易委員會對以太坊及其開發商的調查引起了加密社區的擔憂。 Consensys 的投訴顯示，該公司已收到多份傳票和威爾斯通知，表明 SEC 打算提出指控。美國證券交易委員會 (SEC) 正在尋求有關 Consensys 的營運、ETH 持有量以及參與以太坊向權益證明過渡的資訊。

Consensys has fully complied with the SEC's requests for information, demonstrating its willingness to cooperate with the agency. However, the company believes that the SEC has overstepped its authority by targeting open-source developers and seeking to regulate peer-to-peer software used for blockchain transactions.

Consensys 完全遵守了 SEC 的資訊要求，表明了與該機構合作的意願。然而，該公司認為，美國證券交易委員會針對開源開發商並尋求監管用於區塊鏈交易的點對點軟體，已經越權。

A Broader Industry Pushback

更廣泛的行業阻力

Consensys' lawsuit is not an isolated incident. Several other crypto companies and organizations have expressed a growing willingness to challenge the SEC's regulatory approach, which they view as overly aggressive and damaging to the industry's innovation. Coinbase, Kraken, Uniswap, and the Blockchain Association are among those that have taken legal action or engaged in lobbying efforts.

Consensys 的訴訟並不是一個孤立事件。其他幾家加密貨幣公司和組織也表示越來越願意挑戰 SEC 的監管方式，他們認為這種監管方式過於激進並損害了該行業的創新。 Coinbase、Kraken、Uniswap 和區塊鏈協會等已採取法律行動或參與遊說工作。

This industry-wide pushback signals a shift in the dynamics between the SEC and the crypto sector. Companies are no longer willing to passively accept regulatory overreach and are proactively seeking clarity and legal protection.

這種全行業的抵制標誌著 SEC 和加密貨幣行業之間動態的轉變。企業不再願意被動接受監管過度，而是主動尋求明確性和法律保護。

Consensys' Aim: Clarity, Preemption, and a Precedent

Consensys 的目標：清晰、先發制人和先例

Consensys' lawsuit has three primary objectives:

Consensys 的訴訟有三個主要目標：

1. Clarification of Ethereum's Status: Consensys seeks a court declaration that Ethereum is a commodity, not a security. This would provide certainty for the industry and shield Ethereum from future SEC enforcement actions.
2. Protection for Ethereum Developers: Consensys aims to prevent the SEC from targeting open-source developers who contribute to Ethereum's development. The company argues that such actions stifle innovation and undermine the decentralized nature of blockchain technology.
3. Setting a Precedent: Consensys' lawsuit could have far-reaching implications for the regulation of cryptocurrencies. If successful, it could establish a precedent that limits the SEC's authority over digital assets and provides a roadmap for other companies facing regulatory pressure.

Potential Supreme Court Implications

澄清以太坊的地位：Consensys 尋求法院聲明以太坊是一種商品，而不是一種證券。這將為業界提供確定性，並保護以太坊免受 SEC 未來執法行動的影響。該公司認為，此類行為扼殺了創新並破壞了區塊鏈技術的去中心化性質。如果成功，它可能會開創一個先例，限制 SEC 對數位資產的權威，並為其他面臨監管壓力的公司提供路線圖。

Some legal experts speculate that Consensys' case could potentially make its way to the Supreme Court. The Biden administration has appointed a conservative majority to the court, which is generally perceived as less sympathetic to government regulation. This could increase the likelihood that the Supreme Court would consider Consensys' appeal, potentially leading to a re-examination of the Howey test and the SEC's authority in the crypto space.

一些法律專家推測 Consensys 的案件可能會提交給最高法院。拜登政府任命了最高法院的保守派多數成員，人們普遍認為保守派不太支持政府監管。這可能會增加最高法院考慮 Consensys 上訴的可能性，這可能會導致對 Howey 測試和 SEC 在加密領域的權威進行重新審查。

Conclusion: A Battle for the Future of Crypto

結論：加密貨幣未來之戰

Consensys' lawsuit against the SEC marks a pivotal moment in the regulation of cryptocurrencies. The outcome of this case will shape the future of Ethereum, the broader crypto ecosystem, and the relationship between the industry and government agencies. Consensys' bold stand sends a clear message: companies will not tolerate regulatory overreach and will fight to protect the innovation and growth of the crypto industry. As this legal battle unfolds, the crypto community will be watching closely, hoping that clarity, protection, and a fairer regulatory landscape will emerge.

Consensys 對 SEC 的訴訟標誌著加密貨幣監管的關鍵時刻。此案的結果將塑造以太坊的未來、更廣泛的加密生態系統以及產業與政府機構之間的關係。 Consensys 的大膽立場發出了明確的訊息：公司不會容忍監管過度，並將努力保護加密產業的創新和成長。隨著這場法律戰的展開，加密貨幣社群將密切關注，希望能夠出現清晰、保護和更公平的監管環境。