Consensys 就以太幣代幣分類起訴 SEC，保護 MetaMask

MetaMask 背後的區塊鏈開發公司 Consensys 已在德克薩斯州對 SEC 提起訴訟，認為 SEC 聲稱以太坊的 ETH 代幣是一種證券是非法的，並尋求禁令，禁止 SEC 對 MetaMask 採取法律行動。該訴訟引用了經過編輯的文本，表明 SEC 已發布機密裁決或內部指南，將 ETH 歸類為證券，引發了人們對 ETH 和更廣泛的加密市場潛在影響的猜測。

Consensys Initiates Legal Action Against SEC Over Ethereum Token Classification

Consensys 就以太幣代幣分類問題向 SEC 發起法律訴訟

In a pivotal move that has sent shockwaves through the cryptocurrency industry, blockchain development firm Consensys has filed a lawsuit against the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and its Commissioners in Texas. The lawsuit directly challenges the SEC's assertion that Ethereum's (ETH) token, one of the most widely traded cryptocurrencies, constitutes a security.

區塊鏈開發公司 Consensys 已對美國證券交易委員會 (SEC) 及其德克薩斯州的委員提起訴訟，這是一個在加密貨幣行業引起震動的關鍵舉措。該訴訟直接挑戰了 SEC 的主張，即交易最廣泛的加密貨幣之一以太坊 (ETH) 代幣構成了一種證券。

MetaMask Wallet at Stake

MetaMask 錢包面臨風險

The lawsuit also seeks to prevent the SEC from pursuing legal action against MetaMask, Consensys' popular cryptocurrency wallet with over 30 million monthly active users. Consensys argues that the company merely provides a user interface that facilitates access to other services, such as decentralized exchanges and staking protocols.

該訴訟還試圖阻止 SEC 對 MetaMask 採取法律行動，MetaMask 是 Consensys 旗下流行的加密貨幣錢包，每月活躍用戶超過 3,000 萬。 Consensys 認為，該公司只是提供一個使用者介面，方便存取其他服務，例如去中心化交易所和質押協議。

Confidential SEC Ruling Implied

SEC 隱含裁決的機密

Intriguingly, portions of the lawsuit were redacted, hinting at the possibility that the SEC may have issued a confidential ruling or internal guideline classifying ETH as a security. While the lawsuit explicitly states that the SEC's investigation into ETH transactions is predicated on a determination that ETH is a security, the redacted text leaves room for speculation.

有趣的是，訴訟的部分內容被修改，暗示 SEC 可能發布了一項機密裁決或內部指南，將 ETH 歸類為證券。雖然訴訟明確指出 SEC 對 ETH 交易的調查是基於 ETH 是一種證券的認定，但經過編輯的文本留下了猜測的空間。

SEC's Position History

SEC 的立場歷史

Consensys, co-founded by Ethereum co-founder Joe Lubin, expresses dissatisfaction with the SEC's apparent reversal of its previous stance on ETH. In 2018, SEC Director William Hinman declared that ETH was a commodity, not a security. However, the SEC's recent actions suggest a significant shift in position.

由以太坊聯合創始人 Joe Lubin 聯合創立的 Consensys 對 SEC 明顯逆轉其先前對 ETH 的立場表示不滿。 2018 年，SEC 主任 William Hinman 宣稱 ETH 是一種商品，而不是證券。然而，美國證券交易委員會最近的行動表明立場發生了重大轉變。

Proof-of-Stake Implications

權益證明的影響

Ethereum's transition from proof-of-work to proof-of-stake, known as the Ethereum Merge, may have influenced the SEC's current viewpoint. In this new model, validators stake cryptocurrency to earn rewards, which has led to questions about whether such activities resemble securities trading.

以太坊從工作量證明到股權證明的轉變（稱為以太坊合併）可能影響了 SEC 當前的觀點。在這種新模型中，驗證者透過抵押加密貨幣來賺取獎勵，這引發了人們對此類活動是否類似於證券交易的質疑。

Crypto Industry Reactions

加密產業的反應

Despite the lawsuit, crypto markets have reacted with relative calm, potentially indicating that the news was largely anticipated. However, the SEC's expected approval of an ETH exchange-traded fund (ETF) raises concerns about the potential impact of the SEC's current stance on the approval process.

儘管有訴訟，加密貨幣市場的反應相對平靜，這可能表明這一消息在很大程度上是預料之中的。然而，SEC 預期批准 ETH 交易所交易基金 (ETF) 引發了人們對 SEC 當前立場對審批流程的潛在影響的擔憂。

Inconsistent Regulatory Landscape

監管環境不一致

The lawsuit highlights the ongoing inconsistencies in the regulatory landscape surrounding cryptocurrencies. While the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) continues to classify ETH as a commodity, the SEC's recent actions suggest a different approach. Traditional finance (TradFi) players, such as EDX Markets, only trade ETH as a commodity, emphasizing the complexities of the current regulatory environment.

該訴訟凸顯了加密貨幣監管環境中持續存在的不一致。雖然商品期貨交易委員會 (CFTC) 繼續將 ETH 歸類為商品，但 SEC 最近的行動表明了不同的做法。 EDX Markets 等傳統金融 (TradFi) 參與者僅將 ETH 作為商品進行交易，這凸顯了當前監管環境的複雜性。

Call for Transparency

呼籲透明度

Consensys' lawsuit calls for transparency from the SEC, urging the agency to publicly disclose its reasons for classifying ETH as a security. The lawsuit contends that the SEC has overreached its statutory authority in making such a determination.

Consensys 的訴訟要求 SEC 提高透明度，並敦促該機構公開將 ETH 歸類為證券的原因。該訴訟稱，美國證券交易委員會在做出這樣的決定時超越了其法定權力。

Uncertain Future

不確定的未來

The outcome of the lawsuit and the broader implications for the cryptocurrency industry remain uncertain. The lawsuit represents a significant challenge to the SEC's authority and sets the stage for a potentially lengthy and complex legal battle. As the case unfolds, it will undoubtedly have a profound impact on the development and regulation of cryptocurrencies.

該訴訟的結果以及對加密貨幣行業的更廣泛影響仍不確定。該訴訟是對 SEC 權威的重大挑戰，並為可能漫長而複雜的法律鬥爭奠定了基礎。隨著案件的展開，無疑將對加密貨幣的發展和監管產生深遠影響。