Consensys 就以太坊代币分类起诉 SEC，保护 MetaMask

MetaMask 背后的区块链开发公司 Consensys 已在德克萨斯州对 SEC 提起诉讼，认为 SEC 声称以太坊的 ETH 代币是一种证券是非法的，并寻求禁令，禁止 SEC 对 MetaMask 采取法律行动。该诉讼引用了经过编辑的文本，表明 SEC 已发布机密裁决或内部指南，将 ETH 归类为证券，引发了人们对 ETH 和更广泛的加密市场潜在影响的猜测。

Consensys Initiates Legal Action Against SEC Over Ethereum Token Classification

Consensys 就以太坊代币分类问题向 SEC 发起法律诉讼

In a pivotal move that has sent shockwaves through the cryptocurrency industry, blockchain development firm Consensys has filed a lawsuit against the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and its Commissioners in Texas. The lawsuit directly challenges the SEC's assertion that Ethereum's (ETH) token, one of the most widely traded cryptocurrencies, constitutes a security.

区块链开发公司 Consensys 已对美国证券交易委员会 (SEC) 及其德克萨斯州的委员提起诉讼，这是一个在加密货币行业引起震动的关键举措。该诉讼直接挑战了 SEC 的主张，即交易最广泛的加密货币之一以太坊 (ETH) 代币构成了一种证券。

MetaMask Wallet at Stake

MetaMask 钱包面临风险

The lawsuit also seeks to prevent the SEC from pursuing legal action against MetaMask, Consensys' popular cryptocurrency wallet with over 30 million monthly active users. Consensys argues that the company merely provides a user interface that facilitates access to other services, such as decentralized exchanges and staking protocols.

该诉讼还试图阻止 SEC 对 MetaMask 采取法律行动，MetaMask 是 Consensys 旗下流行的加密货币钱包，每月活跃用户超过 3000 万。 Consensys 认为，该公司只是提供一个用户界面，方便访问其他服务，例如去中心化交易所和质押协议。

Confidential SEC Ruling Implied

SEC 隐含裁决的机密

Intriguingly, portions of the lawsuit were redacted, hinting at the possibility that the SEC may have issued a confidential ruling or internal guideline classifying ETH as a security. While the lawsuit explicitly states that the SEC's investigation into ETH transactions is predicated on a determination that ETH is a security, the redacted text leaves room for speculation.

有趣的是，诉讼的部分内容被修改，暗示 SEC 可能发布了一项机密裁决或内部指南，将 ETH 归类为证券。虽然诉讼明确指出 SEC 对 ETH 交易的调查是基于 ETH 是一种证券的认定，但经过编辑的文本留下了猜测的空间。

SEC's Position History

SEC 的立场历史

Consensys, co-founded by Ethereum co-founder Joe Lubin, expresses dissatisfaction with the SEC's apparent reversal of its previous stance on ETH. In 2018, SEC Director William Hinman declared that ETH was a commodity, not a security. However, the SEC's recent actions suggest a significant shift in position.

由以太坊联合创始人 Joe Lubin 联合创立的 Consensys 对 SEC 明显逆转其之前对 ETH 的立场表示不满。 2018 年，SEC 主任 William Hinman 宣称 ETH 是一种商品，而不是证券。然而，美国证券交易委员会最近的行动表明立场发生了重大转变。

Proof-of-Stake Implications

权益证明的影响

Ethereum's transition from proof-of-work to proof-of-stake, known as the Ethereum Merge, may have influenced the SEC's current viewpoint. In this new model, validators stake cryptocurrency to earn rewards, which has led to questions about whether such activities resemble securities trading.

以太坊从工作量证明到股权证明的转变（称为以太坊合并）可能影响了 SEC 当前的观点。在这种新模型中，验证者通过抵押加密货币来赚取奖励，这引发了人们对此类活动是否类似于证券交易的质疑。

Crypto Industry Reactions

加密行业的反应

Despite the lawsuit, crypto markets have reacted with relative calm, potentially indicating that the news was largely anticipated. However, the SEC's expected approval of an ETH exchange-traded fund (ETF) raises concerns about the potential impact of the SEC's current stance on the approval process.

尽管有诉讼，加密货币市场的反应相对平静，这可能表明这一消息在很大程度上是预料之中的。然而，SEC 预期批准 ETH 交易所交易基金 (ETF) 引发了人们对 SEC 当前立场对审批流程的潜在影响的担忧。

Inconsistent Regulatory Landscape

监管环境不一致

The lawsuit highlights the ongoing inconsistencies in the regulatory landscape surrounding cryptocurrencies. While the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) continues to classify ETH as a commodity, the SEC's recent actions suggest a different approach. Traditional finance (TradFi) players, such as EDX Markets, only trade ETH as a commodity, emphasizing the complexities of the current regulatory environment.

该诉讼凸显了加密货币监管环境中持续存在的不一致。虽然商品期货交易委员会 (CFTC) 继续将 ETH 归类为商品，但 SEC 最近的行动表明了不同的做法。 EDX Markets 等传统金融 (TradFi) 参与者仅将 ETH 作为商品进行交易，这凸显了当前监管环境的复杂性。

Call for Transparency

呼吁透明度

Consensys' lawsuit calls for transparency from the SEC, urging the agency to publicly disclose its reasons for classifying ETH as a security. The lawsuit contends that the SEC has overreached its statutory authority in making such a determination.

Consensys 的诉讼要求 SEC 提高透明度，敦促该机构公开披露将 ETH 归类为证券的原因。该诉讼称，美国证券交易委员会在做出这样的决定时超越了其法定权力。

Uncertain Future

不确定的未来

The outcome of the lawsuit and the broader implications for the cryptocurrency industry remain uncertain. The lawsuit represents a significant challenge to the SEC's authority and sets the stage for a potentially lengthy and complex legal battle. As the case unfolds, it will undoubtedly have a profound impact on the development and regulation of cryptocurrencies.

该诉讼的结果以及对加密货币行业的更广泛影响仍不确定。该诉讼是对 SEC 权威的重大挑战，并为可能漫长而复杂的法律斗争奠定了基础。随着案件的展开，无疑将对加密货币的发展和监管产生深远影响。