從某物中賺錢的能力並不能定義其價值。伯尼·麥道夫 (Bernie Madoff) 的 650 億美元(510 億英鎊)計劃對他來說價值數十年
The value of something isn’t determined by its ability to generate income. Bernie Madoff’s $65 billion (£51 billion) scheme was worth a lot to him for decades, and anyone who got out before it blew up could make a good profit—whether or not they believed it was a fraud.
某物的價值並不取決於其創收能力。幾十年來,伯尼·麥道夫(Bernie Madoff) 的650 億美元(510 億英鎊)計劃對他來說價值不菲,任何在該計劃爆發之前逃脫的人都可以賺取豐厚的利潤,無論他們是否相信這是一個騙局。
Just because you’ll likely make a quick 10-20 percent return on Bitcoin over the next couple of months doesn’t mean it has any value.
僅僅因為您可能在接下來的幾個月內獲得比特幣 10-20% 的快速回報,並不意味著它有任何價值。
Both the Financial Conduct Authority and the Securities and Exchange Commission use the term “cryptoassets” generously, more out of a lack of a better word than a strong belief in its definition.
金融行為監理局和證券交易委員會都慷慨地使用「加密資產」一詞,更多是因為缺乏更好的詞,而不是對其定義的堅定信念。
An asset is typically defined as “something valuable belonging to a person or organization that can be used for the payment of debts.”
資產通常被定義為「屬於個人或組織、可用於償還債務的有價值的東西」。
Bitcoin is at best a temporary measure, and I imagine you’d rather have trouble paying off any but the most illicit debts with it.
比特幣充其量只是一種臨時措施,我想你寧願用它來償還除最非法債務之外的任何債務。
免責聲明:info@kdj.com
所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!
如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。