![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Some bitcoin (BTC) derivatives that claim to be fully backed by the cryptocurrency could be on shaky ground, a blog post by Bitcoin research and media firm LX Research suggests.
Most of these assets are in the form of a BTC-pegged derivative token – representations of native BTC on other blockchains such as Ethereum – a $30 billion market (only for the thirty-eight assets LX Research currently tracks).
The term “wrapped bitcoin” typically refers to a token issued to users after they deposit a corresponding amount of native BTC with a custodian. The token can then be used for various decentralized finance (defi) purposes such as lending. Users can later return the wrapped token to the issuer and retrieve their bitcoin, after which, the token is burned.
For the model to work, the wrapped token should be fully backed by bitcoin on a 1:1 basis. But what happens when custodians and merchants start to rehypothecate collateral or begin issuing wrapped tokens backed by other derivative assets instead of bitcoin? The result could be a bank run, according to LX Research writer Janus.
“We’re not sure if all BTC-derivative assets are fully backed,” Janus wrote. He also posted a scenario on X where a custodian mints multiple tokens without sufficient collateral.
“If there is a large number of withdrawals on any two of these tokens at the same time, operators will not be able to redeem liquidity from the exchanges to process withdrawals in a timely manner, Janus explained. “This could trigger a bank run.”
He also noted that the wrapped bitcoin market suffers from centralization risk where multiple projects share the same custodian.
“It’s clear that a number of these protocols are using centralized custodians to ensure that their assets are backed 1:1. And a number of these projects are sharing the same custodian(s),” Janus said.
But there’s more – Janus explains that there’s been an explosion of wrapped tokens in the past year. Many of them are not backed by native BTC, but rather, collateralized by other wrapped tokens, creating a house of cards.
“Projects are not simply using native BTC to fully back their assets. Other derivative assets, such as cbBTC [Coinbase wrapped BTC] and wBTC [BitGo wrapped BTC], are being used as reserve assets for newer derivatives,” Janus explained. “This compounds custodian risk. If a wrapped reserve asset became unbacked, then all of the assets that it backs would also become unbacked.”
Janus posed other questions that require clarity – is the total value locked (TVL) for these assets accurate or fake? Do projects control the native bitcoin backing their wrapped tokens?
To help answer this question, Janus said LX Research is developing a framework for wrapped derivative assets that will be available in matter of days.
“Users of BTC-backed tokens and protocols should understand the risks when interacting with specific assets,” Janus said. “We will be releasing a full framework and corresponding reviews in the coming days.”
免責聲明:info@kdj.com
所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!
如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。
-
- 加密貨幣行業仍然是軟件供應鏈攻擊的主要目標
- 2025-04-05 01:40:12
- 當涉及軟件供應鏈攻擊的頻率和復雜性時,很少有行業可以與加密貨幣行業進行比較。
-
-
-
- 特朗普的關稅可能引發一場新的全球貿易戰,並派遣比特幣
- 2025-04-05 01:35:12
- 美國總統唐納德·特朗普(Donald Trump)再次成為頭條新聞,他的最新提議向主要貿易夥伴徵收大量關稅。
-
- 比特幣是唯一能夠維持defi下一次演變的網絡
- 2025-04-05 01:30:12
- 以太坊正在掙扎,因此,分散的金融(DEFI)遭受了苦難。第2層(L2)溶液的流動性破裂
-
- 比特幣相對於股票表現出彈性
- 2025-04-05 01:30:12
- 戴維·埃爾南德斯(David Hernandez)表示
-
- RUVI(RUV)AI加密貨幣市值承諾在預售期間1400%ROI
- 2025-04-05 01:25:11
- 加密貨幣市場再次引起了人們的關注,卡爾達諾(ADA)的價格下降了8%
-
-