比特幣（BTC）需要一個新的測量單位來解決單位偏差

2025年4月19日，JAN3首席執行官Samson Mow（@Excellion）在X上激發了關於我們如何看待比特幣和替代幣的對話，以及比特幣是否需要新的測量單位來實現其最稀有的切片。

JAN3 CEO Samson Mow has sparked a conversation about how we perceive Bitcoin and altcoin value, and whether the former needs a new unit of measurement for its rarest slice.

JAN3首席執行官Samson Mow引發了關於我們如何看待比特幣和Altcoin價值的對話，以及前者是否需要針對其最稀有切片的新單位。

In a post on X (formerly Twitter), Mow initially observed that one twenty-one millionth of the Bitcoin supply (which is about one Bitcoin) currently costs around $85,000. He then compared this to altcoins by recalculating their market capitalizations as if they too had only 21 million coins, estimating that one twenty-one millionth of Ethereum would cost $9,200, XRP would cost $5,800, and Solana would cost $3,400.

在X（以前為Twitter）的一篇文章中，MOW最初觀察到，當前比特幣供應量的二十百萬（大約是一個比特幣）目前的價格約為85,000美元。然後，他通過重新計算其市值，就好像他們只有2100萬枚硬幣，將其與Altcoins進行了比較，估計以太坊中有21百萬的以太坊的價格為9,200美元，XRP的價格為5,800美元，而Solana的價格為3,400美元。

His method highlighted the impact of unit bias—the psychological trick where investors are drawn to assets that appear “cheap” simply because there are more units outstanding.

他的方法強調了單位偏見的影響，這是一種心理技巧，即投資者被吸引到看起來“便宜”的資產中，僅僅是因為有更多的單位出色。

“Most alts take advantage of unit bias by utilizing a very high supply, so people can't figure out what they're buying,” Mow wrote. “Unit bias is absolutely destroying the uninitiated.”

Mow寫道：“大多數ALTS通過使用非常高的供應來利用單位偏見，因此人們無法弄清楚他們購買的東西。” “單位偏見絕對破壞了未經啟發的人。”

To address the difficulty of referring to such a precise fraction of Bitcoin, Mow proposed adopting the term “Finney”—historically defined as 10 satoshis—for one twenty-one millionth of Bitcoin’s supply.

為了解決比特幣如此精確的比特幣的困難，MOW提議採用“ Finney”一詞（歷史上定義為10個Satoshis），以佔比特幣供應量的二十萬。

“No one needs a unit for 10 sats, but we do need an easy to way refer to 1/21 million of Bitcoin.”

“沒有人需要一個單位10個SAT，但是我們確實需要一種易於使用的方式，指1/21萬比特幣。”

The proposal triggered a flurry of responses across the Bitcoin X. FractalEncrypt joked, “let's call it a Bitcoin and I'll submit a BIP with cringe AI memes,” while Channing Griffin argued that owning 1/21 millionth of the supply is already implicit with the term one Bitcoin, and there is no need for a new term like “Finney.”

該提案引發了一連串的回答，跨比特幣X。 Fractalencrypt開玩笑說：“讓我們稱其為比特幣，我將提交一個帶有Cringe AI Memes的Bip，” Channing Griffin認為擁有1/2100萬的供應已經與一個比特幣含義了，這是一個比特幣，而不是一個比特幣，而不是一個新的enterne nre terne nerthe nerthey finney”。”

Sani suggested whimsical alternatives like “Finnaire,” “Finnero,” or “Haltaire,” playing on Bitcoin's rising image as “digital aristocracy.”

Sani提出了異想天開的替代方案，例如“ Finnaire”，“ Finnero”或“ Haltaire”，以比特幣的上升形象為“數字貴族”。

Chris Krause noted that since there is already a “Nakamoto” unit for Bitcoin, a “Finney” could be a fitting tribute to early Bitcoin pioneer Hal Finney.

克里斯·克勞斯（Chris Krause）指出，由於比特幣已經有一個“中村”部門，因此“ Finney”可能是對早期比特幣先驅Hal Finney的敬意。

Beyond the unit discussion, Mow’s broader point—that altcoin valuations appear absurd when stripped of unit bias—resonated with many. Walker remarked on how overvalued altcoins seem. Swiss Hodler bluntly stated, “the alts are worth zero. The crypto bros just don't know it yet.”

除了單位討論之外，MOW的更廣泛的觀點 - 剝奪了單位偏見時的山寨幣估值似乎是荒謬的。沃克（Walker）談到了高估山寨幣的價值。瑞士·霍德勒直言不諱地說：“ alts價值為零。加密兄弟兄弟還不知道。”

Based UTXO reminded readers that many altcoins do not even have a true supply cap, which further undermines their long-term value propositions.

總部位於UTXO提醒讀者，許多AltCoins甚至沒有真正的供應上限，這進一步破壞了其長期價值主張。

The conversation showed just how early the Bitcoin ecosystem still is when it comes to standardizing how ownership, valuation, and scarcity are discussed. Whether “Finney” catches on or not, Mow’s framing reinforced a key Bitcoin message: there will only ever be 21 million.

對話表明，當涉及到如何討論所有權，估值和稀缺性時，比特幣生態系統仍有多早。不管“ Finney”是否抓住，MOW的框架都加強了一個關鍵的比特幣信息：只有2100萬。