比特币（BTC）需要一个新的测量单位来解决单位偏差

2025年4月19日，JAN3首席执行官Samson Mow（@Excellion）在X上激发了关于我们如何看待比特币和替代币的对话，以及比特币是否需要新的测量单位来实现其最稀有的切片。

JAN3 CEO Samson Mow has sparked a conversation about how we perceive Bitcoin and altcoin value, and whether the former needs a new unit of measurement for its rarest slice.

JAN3首席执行官Samson Mow引发了关于我们如何看待比特币和Altcoin价值的对话，以及前者是否需要针对其最稀有切片的新单位。

In a post on X (formerly Twitter), Mow initially observed that one twenty-one millionth of the Bitcoin supply (which is about one Bitcoin) currently costs around $85,000. He then compared this to altcoins by recalculating their market capitalizations as if they too had only 21 million coins, estimating that one twenty-one millionth of Ethereum would cost $9,200, XRP would cost $5,800, and Solana would cost $3,400.

在X（以前为Twitter）的一篇文章中，MOW最初观察到，当前比特币供应量的二十百万（大约是一个比特币）目前的价格约为85,000美元。然后，他通过重新计算其市值，就好像他们只有2100万枚硬币，将其与Altcoins进行了比较，估计以太坊中有21百万的以太坊的价格为9,200美元，XRP的价格为5,800美元，而Solana的价格为3,400美元。

His method highlighted the impact of unit bias—the psychological trick where investors are drawn to assets that appear “cheap” simply because there are more units outstanding.

他的方法强调了单位偏见的影响，这是一种心理技巧，即投资者被吸引到看起来“便宜”的资产中，仅仅是因为有更多的单位出色。

“Most alts take advantage of unit bias by utilizing a very high supply, so people can't figure out what they're buying,” Mow wrote. “Unit bias is absolutely destroying the uninitiated.”

Mow写道：“大多数ALTS通过使用非常高的供应来利用单位偏见，因此人们无法弄清楚他们购买的东西。” “单位偏见绝对破坏了未经启发的人。”

To address the difficulty of referring to such a precise fraction of Bitcoin, Mow proposed adopting the term “Finney”—historically defined as 10 satoshis—for one twenty-one millionth of Bitcoin’s supply.

为了解决比特币如此精确的比特币的困难，MOW提议采用“ Finney”一词（历史上定义为10个Satoshis），以占比特币供应量的二十万。

“No one needs a unit for 10 sats, but we do need an easy to way refer to 1/21 million of Bitcoin.”

“没有人需要一个单位10个SAT，但是我们确实需要一种易于使用的方式，指1/21万比特币。”

The proposal triggered a flurry of responses across the Bitcoin X. FractalEncrypt joked, “let's call it a Bitcoin and I'll submit a BIP with cringe AI memes,” while Channing Griffin argued that owning 1/21 millionth of the supply is already implicit with the term one Bitcoin, and there is no need for a new term like “Finney.”

该提案引发了一连串的回答，跨比特币X。Fractalencrypt开玩笑说：“让我们称其为比特币，我将提交一个带有Cringe AI Memes的Bip，” Channing Griffin认为拥有1/2100万的供应已经与一个比特币含义了，这是一个比特币，而不是一个比特币，而不是一个新的enterne nre terne nerthe nerthey finney”。”

Sani suggested whimsical alternatives like “Finnaire,” “Finnero,” or “Haltaire,” playing on Bitcoin's rising image as “digital aristocracy.”

Sani提出了异想天开的替代方案，例如“ Finnaire”，“ Finnero”或“ Haltaire”，以比特币的上升形象为“数字贵族”。

Chris Krause noted that since there is already a “Nakamoto” unit for Bitcoin, a “Finney” could be a fitting tribute to early Bitcoin pioneer Hal Finney.

克里斯·克劳斯（Chris Krause）指出，由于比特币已经有一个“中村”部门，因此“ Finney”可能是对早期比特币先驱Hal Finney的敬意。

Beyond the unit discussion, Mow’s broader point—that altcoin valuations appear absurd when stripped of unit bias—resonated with many. Walker remarked on how overvalued altcoins seem. Swiss Hodler bluntly stated, “the alts are worth zero. The crypto bros just don't know it yet.”

除了单位讨论之外，MOW的更广泛的观点 - 剥夺了单位偏见时的山寨币估值似乎是荒谬的。沃克（Walker）谈到了高估山寨币的价值。瑞士·霍德勒直言不讳地说：“ alts价值为零。加密兄弟兄弟还不知道。”

Based UTXO reminded readers that many altcoins do not even have a true supply cap, which further undermines their long-term value propositions.

总部位于UTXO提醒读者，许多AltCoins甚至没有真正的供应上限，这进一步破坏了其长期价值主张。

The conversation showed just how early the Bitcoin ecosystem still is when it comes to standardizing how ownership, valuation, and scarcity are discussed. Whether “Finney” catches on or not, Mow’s framing reinforced a key Bitcoin message: there will only ever be 21 million.

对话表明，当涉及到如何讨论所有权，估值和稀缺性时，比特币生态系统仍有多早。不管“ Finney”是否抓住，MOW的框架都加强了一个关键的比特币信息：只有2100万。