在接近XRP訴訟和解中，美國SEC發布了期待已久的Hinman報告

儘管這一發展，XRP社區仍然感到失望，因為據報導，監察長關於比爾·辛曼（Bill Hinman）有爭議的講話的報告缺乏明確性。

Amidst the anticipation for the nearing XRP lawsuit settlement, the US SEC released the long-awaited Hinman report, sparking controversy within the crypto community.

在對接近XRP訴訟解決方案的期望之中，美國SEC發布了期待已久的Hinman報告，引發了加密社區中的爭議。

However, despite this development, the XRP community remains disappointed, as the Inspector General’s report on Bill Hinman’s controversial speech reportedly lacks clarity.

然而，儘管這一發展，XRP社區仍然感到失望，因為據報導，監察長關於比爾·辛曼（Bill Hinman）有爭議的講話的報告缺乏明確性。

Experts like John Deaton and MetaLawMan highlight the inconsistencies in the IG’s Hinman report. Let’s analyze their statements and the report’s key implications on the XRP lawsuit.

John Deaton和Metalawman等專家突出了IG的Hinman報告中的不一致之處。讓我們分析他們的陳述以及該報告對XRP訴訟的關鍵含義。

XRP Lawsuit: Experts Reveal Inconsistencies in Hinman Report

XRP訴訟：專家在Hinman報告中揭示了不一致之處

Although the US SEC has released the Inspector General’s Hinman report, the XRP community raises concerns about its inconsistencies. Prominent players like John Deaton and MetaLawMan, who have been vocal throughout the XRP lawsuit, emphasized the IG’s “whitewashing” of William Hinman’s Ethereum speech.

儘管美國SEC已發布了監察長的Hinman報告，但XRP社區引起了人們對其不一致之處的擔憂。在XRP訴訟中一直發聲的John Deaton和Metalawman等著名球員強調了IG對William Hinman的以太坊演講的“粉飾”。

Significantly, XRP lawyer John Deaton posited that the IG’s Hinman report is flawed. He added that the IG is competent, hinting at her biased findings. Listing a few reasons for his statement, Deaton wrote, “Here’s a few points off the top of my head that proves the IG is either incompetent or something else is at play.”

值得注意的是，XRP律師John Deaton認為IG的Hinman報告存在缺陷。他補充說，IG有能力，暗示了她的偏見發現。 Deaton列出了一些陳述的原因，他寫道：“以下是我頭頂上的幾點，證明IG是無能的，或者其他事情正在發揮作用。”

What Are John Deaton’s Findings?

約翰·迪頓的發現是什麼？

In his recent X post, John Deaton highlighted several reasons for his disappointment with the IG report of Bill Hinman’s speech. According to Deaton, the IG’s claim that owning ETH wouldn’t constitute a conflict of interest contradicts SEC policies that prohibit token ownership to prevent conflicts. The XRP lawyer highlighted multiple points to question the report’s credibility.

約翰·迪頓（John Deaton）在最近的X帖子中強調了他對比爾·辛曼（Bill Hinman）講話的IG報告失望的幾個原因。根據Deaton的說法，IG關於擁有ETH不會構成利益衝突的說法與禁止令牌所有權防止衝突的SEC政策相矛盾。 XRP律師強調了多個要點來質疑該報告的信譽。

Hinman’s Meetings with Simpson Thacher

Hinman與Simpson Thacher的會議

Reportedly, Bill Hinman met his partners at Simpson Thacher, despite warnings from SEC Ethics. One of the partners Hinman met with was involved in the Canaan IPO, a company that manufactured Ethereum (ETH) mining equipment. This raises questions about potential favoritism or influence.

據報導，儘管有SEC倫理的警告，但比爾·辛曼（Bill Hinman）在辛普森·塔赫（Simpson Thacher）會見了他的合作夥伴。 Hinman與之相遇的合作夥伴參與了製造以太坊（ETH）採礦設備的公司Canaan IPO。這引發了有關潛在偏愛或影響力的疑問。

Were Hinman’s Words Personal?

辛曼的話是個人的嗎？

In the XRP lawsuit, Hinman claimed that his speech that deemed Ethereum as a non-security represented his personal opinion. In contradiction, the IG stated that it was collaborative.

在XRP訴訟中，Hinman聲稱他認為以太坊是非安全性的講話代表了他的個人意見。在矛盾的情況下，IG表示這是協作的。

Previously, John Deaton urged the SEC to release the Hinman report to provide more clarity to the ongoing crypto case, including the XRP lawsuit. Though the SEC publicized the report, he remains disheartened due to the IG’s biased statements.

此前，約翰·迪頓（John Deaton）敦促美國證券交易委員會（SEC）發布《辛曼（Hinman）報告》，以更加清晰，以更加清晰，包括XRP訴訟在內。儘管SEC宣布了該報告，但由於IG的偏見陳述，他仍然感到沮喪。

Experts Slam IG’s Hinman Report

專家SLAM IG的Hinman報告

Furthermore, lawyer MetaLawMan underscored the “narrow scope” of the IG’s investigation of Hinman’s speech. According to him, the investigation was limited to determining whether Hinman broke any criminal laws rather than thoroughly examining potential conflicts of interest or ethics violations.

此外，律師Metalawman強調了IG對Hinman演講的調查的“狹窄範圍”。據他說，調查僅限於確定辛曼是否違反了任何刑法，而不是徹底檢查潛在的利益衝突或違反道德衝突。

Moreover, highlighting its biased nature, the XRP proponent stated, “And, of course, the investigation was conducted, and the report completed, under the Gensler regime.”

此外，XRP支持者指出，強調其偏見性質，“當然，在Gensler政權下進行了調查，該報告完成了。”

What’s Next for the XRP Lawsuit?

XRP訴訟的下一步是什麼？

In a surprising development, the US SEC dropped its appeal in the XRP lawsuit, after which Ripple withdrew its cross-appeal. Despite this development, the ultimate settlement of the case remains uncertain, sparking multiple interpretations.

在令人驚訝的發展中，美國SEC在XRP訴訟中撤銷了上訴，此後，Ripple撤回了其交叉訴訟。儘管發展了這一發展，但案件的最終解決仍然不確定，引發了多種解釋。

Many believe that an imminent settlement is likely in the XRP case. However, the Hinman report’s inconsistencies have further complicated the Ripple lawsuit, with uncertain implications for its outcome.

許多人認為，在XRP案件中可能會達成解決方案。但是，《辛曼報告》的不一致使漣漪訴訟進一步複雜化，對結果的影響不確定。