Market Cap: $2.6973T 2.990%
Volume(24h): $106.1476B -15.330%
  • Market Cap: $2.6973T 2.990%
  • Volume(24h): $106.1476B -15.330%
  • Fear & Greed Index:
  • Market Cap: $2.6973T 2.990%
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
Top News
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
bitcoin
bitcoin

$82951.790245 USD

-0.70%

ethereum
ethereum

$1791.465527 USD

-1.83%

tether
tether

$0.999717 USD

-0.01%

xrp
xrp

$2.055970 USD

0.14%

bnb
bnb

$593.238692 USD

-1.32%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$1.000032 USD

0.02%

solana
solana

$115.381354 USD

-4.13%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.161732 USD

-2.67%

cardano
cardano

$0.649656 USD

-0.44%

tron
tron

$0.239261 USD

1.04%

unus-sed-leo
unus-sed-leo

$9.561241 USD

1.74%

toncoin
toncoin

$3.530703 USD

-6.73%

chainlink
chainlink

$12.739766 USD

-3.87%

stellar
stellar

$0.259841 USD

-2.48%

avalanche
avalanche

$18.093210 USD

-3.52%

Cryptocurrency News Articles

SC: If disciplining children results in harming their dignity, it is considered child abuse

Jan 10, 2025 at 01:38 am

SC: If disciplining children results in harming their dignity, it is considered child abuse

The Supreme Court (SC) has ruled that disciplining children in a manner that harms their dignity is considered child abuse, based on a decision made last year and promulgated on 9 January.

In a decision penned by Associate Justice Jhosep Y. Lopez and dated 22 July 2024, the SC’s Second Division upheld the conviction of a father for child abuse after he subjected his 12-year-old daughter and 10-year-old son to violent and excessive discipline.

Court records showed that the father from 2017 to 2018 beat his children, kicking his daughter, pulling her hair, striking her with a wooden rod with a nail, hitting them with a dustpan, and cursing at them repeatedly.

He claimed these actions were meant to discipline his children for misbehavior, such as failing to eat lunch and losing money from their coin banks.

The father was found guilty by a Regional Trial Court (RTC) and the Court of Appeals (CA) for violating Republic Act 7610, or the Special Protection of Children Against Abuse, Exploitation and Discrimination Act.

Under Section 3(b) of RA 7610, any act that debases, degrades, or demeans a child’s dignity is considered child abuse.

The father appealed to the SC, arguing that he had no intention of harming his children’s dignity.

However, the SC ruled that his actions went beyond reasonable discipline, showing a clear intent to harm the children’s dignity.

While parents have the right to discipline their children, such measures must not be violent, excessive, or disproportionate to their misbehavior, the SC said.

It noted that without this specific intent, the offender cannot be held liable for child abuse but can be charged with other crimes under the Revised Penal Code (RPC).

The father was sentenced to four to six years in prison and fined P45,000. He was also ordered to pay his children P180,000 in damages.

The court reiterated that disciplining children, if it results in physical injuries, does not automatically amount to child abuse.

For such acts to be considered abuse, there must be a clear intent to harm a child’s dignity, it explained.

Disclaimer:info@kdj.com

The information provided is not trading advice. kdj.com does not assume any responsibility for any investments made based on the information provided in this article. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and it is highly recommended that you invest with caution after thorough research!

If you believe that the content used on this website infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately (info@kdj.com) and we will delete it promptly.

Other articles published on Apr 05, 2025