ZK代币坠毁了17％

Zksync生态系统再次发现自己处于争议之中，这次是在严重的安全漏洞导致价格急剧下降之后

The ZKSync ecosystem has fallen victim to a serious security breach, leading to a sharp decline in the price of its native token, ZK.

ZKSYNC生态系统已成为严重的安全漏洞的受害者，导致其原始令牌ZK的价格急剧下降。

According to on-chain activity observed on April 15, an entity successfully minted 110 million ZK tokens earlier today. Of this staggering amount, the individual has already sold 66 million tokens, triggering massive volatility and panic across crypto exchanges.

根据4月15日观察到的链上活动，一个实体今天早些时候成功地铸造了1.1亿个ZK代币。在这笔惊人的数量中，该个人已经出售了6600万个令牌，引发了加密交易所的大规模波动和恐慌。

Notably, the ZKSync security team quickly released a statement on X regarding the development. They acknowledged that an admin account suffered a compromise, granting the attacker access to nearly $5 million worth of unclaimed tokens from the project’s airdrop allocation.

值得注意的是，ZKSYNC安全团队迅速发布了有关X关于开发的声明。他们承认，管理员帐户遭受了妥协，从该项目的Airdrop分配中允许攻击者获得价值近500万美元的无人认领令牌。

zkSync security team has identified a compromised admin account that took control of ~$5M worth of ZK tokens—the remaining unclaimed tokens from the zkSync airdrop. Necessary security measures are being taken.

ZKSYNC安全团队已经确定了一个受损的管理员帐户，该帐户控制了价值约500万美元的ZK令牌，这是Zksync Airdrop的其余无人认领的令牌。正在采取必要的安全措施。

All user funds are safe and have never been at risk. The zkSync...

所有用户资金都是安全的，从未有风险。 zksync ...

— zkSync (∎, ∆) (@zksync) April 15, 2025

- Zksync（∎，∆）（@zksync）2025年4月15日

The team highlighted that the exploit only impacted the airdrop contract and did not affect the broader ZKSync protocol, the ZK token smart contract, or user wallets. According to them, security teams have already initiated emergency protocols, and a complete investigation is underway to determine the full scope of the breach.

该团队强调，漏洞利用只会影响空调合同，并不会影响更广泛的ZKSYNC协议，ZK代币智能合约或用户钱包。据他们说，安全团队已经启动了紧急协议，并且正在进行全面调查以确定违规的全部范围。

As the core infrastructure remains unaffected, the market reaction was swift. Within a 30-minute window, ZK token’s price plummeted from $0.0478 to $0.0396—a 17% drop that rattled holders and traders.

由于核心基础设施不受影响，市场反应迅速。在一个30分钟的窗口中，ZK令牌的价格从0.0478美元下降到0.0396美元，这是17％的跌落者和交易者。

Although the asset showed signs of recovery, rebounding to $0.0441, the sentiment remains bearish. Additionally, the Relative Volatility Index (RVI), a metric for tracking price turbulence, surged from 18.68 to 72.81 within an hour.

尽管资产显示出恢复的迹象，反弹至0.0441美元，但情绪仍然是看跌。此外，跟踪价格湍流的相对波动率指数（RVI）在一个小时内从18.68升至72.81。

This incident has sparked heated discussions among zkSync’s community members, many of whom have voiced their frustrations since the controversial airdrop.

这一事件引发了ZKSYNC社区成员的激烈讨论，自备受争议的空投以来，其中许多人表达了他们的挫败感。

Pseudonymous commentator Hanky Pym expressed his criticisms, comparing zkSync’s trajectory to that of Mantra’s OM token, which faced a 98% price collapse. Pym claimed the team misused its substantial funding of around $400 million and slammed them for what he perceives as deceitful behavior.

化名评论员Hanky Pym表达了他的批评，将Zksync的轨迹与Mantra的OM令牌进行了比较，后者面临98％的价格崩溃。 Pym声称该团队滥用了大约4亿美元的大量资金，并以他认为欺骗性的行为抨击了他们。

Another member of the community pointed out a contradiction in zkSync’s narrative. The user questioned the legitimacy of the hack, suggesting it might be part of a larger trend where projects exploit the “we were hacked” narrative to cover questionable actions.

社区的另一个成员指出了Zksync的叙述中的矛盾。用户质疑了黑客的合法性，这表明它可能是一个更大趋势的一部分，即项目利用“我们被黑客入侵”的叙述来涵盖可疑的动作。

Meanwhile, Zener, founder of the Web3 infrastructure project Modularity, also intervened, stating that zkSync had essentially severed its ties with the community. He further asserted that the project’s credibility has reached zero.

同时，Web3基础架构项目模块化的创始人齐纳（Zener）也进行了干预，并指出Zksync基本上已经切断了与社区的联系。他进一步断言该项目的信誉已达到零。

The once-promising @zksync has officially turned its back on the community—and with that, its relevance ends here. It’s time to return the $ZK ticker to its rightful owner, @PolyhedraZK. Let’s not forget the blatant insult delivered through their insider-driven airdrop.

曾经曾经有过兴起的@zksync已正式拒绝了社区，其相关性在这里结束。现在该将$ ZK股票的股票返还给其应有的所有者@polyhedrazk。让我们不要忘记通过其内部驱动的空投传递的公然侮辱。

— Zener (@zenerbabax) April 15, 2025

- Zener（@zenerbabax）2025年4月15日

This incident adds another layer of complication to ZKSync’s journey, which has been subject to scrutiny since its controversial airdrop rollout in June 2024.

这一事件增加了Zksync的旅程的另一层并发症，自2024年6月的Airdrop推出以来，该事件一直受到审查。

Designed to reward early adopters and ecosystem participants, the airdrop allocated 3.675 billion ZK tokens, 17.5% of the total 21 billion supply, to 695,232 wallet addresses. This selection represented only about 10% of all active wallets on the network.

旨在奖励早期采用者和生态系统参与者，Airdrop分配了367.5亿个ZK代币，占210亿个供应量的17.5％，达到695,232个钱包地址。此选择仅代表网络上所有活动钱包的10％。

However, the distribution process faced criticism for its uneven allocation. While eligible wallets received anywhere between 450 and 100,000 ZK tokens, more than half of the entire airdrop ended up in the hands of less than 1% of participants.

但是，分销过程因其不平衡的分配而面临批评。虽然合格的钱包收到了450至100,000个ZK代币的任何地方，但整个空调中有一半以上的参与者落入了不到1％的参与者手中。

The situation was further exacerbated by vulnerabilities in Sybil attack prevention. Several users manipulated the eligibility system using multiple wallets, effectively gaming the airdrop. Notably, one individual reportedly secured over 3 million ZK tokens through 85 separate wallets.

Sybil攻击预防中的漏洞进一步加剧了这种情况。一些用户使用多个钱包操纵了资格系统，有效地游戏了空调。值得注意的是，据报道，一个人通过85个单独的钱包获得了超过300万个ZK令牌。