ZK代幣墜毀了17％

Zksync生態系統再次發現自己處於爭議之中，這次是在嚴重的安全漏洞導致價格急劇下降之後

The ZKSync ecosystem has fallen victim to a serious security breach, leading to a sharp decline in the price of its native token, ZK.

ZKSYNC生態系統已成為嚴重的安全漏洞的受害者，導致其原始令牌ZK的價格急劇下降。

According to on-chain activity observed on April 15, an entity successfully minted 110 million ZK tokens earlier today. Of this staggering amount, the individual has already sold 66 million tokens, triggering massive volatility and panic across crypto exchanges.

根據4月15日觀察到的鏈上活動，一個實體今天早些時候成功地鑄造了1.1億個ZK代幣。在這筆驚人的數量中，該個人已經出售了6600萬個令牌，引發了加密交易所的大規模波動和恐慌。

Notably, the ZKSync security team quickly released a statement on X regarding the development. They acknowledged that an admin account suffered a compromise, granting the attacker access to nearly $5 million worth of unclaimed tokens from the project’s airdrop allocation.

值得注意的是，ZKSYNC安全團隊迅速發布了有關X關於開發的聲明。他們承認，管理員帳戶遭受了妥協，從該項目的Airdrop分配中允許攻擊者獲得價值近500萬美元的無人認領令牌。

zkSync security team has identified a compromised admin account that took control of ~$5M worth of ZK tokens—the remaining unclaimed tokens from the zkSync airdrop. Necessary security measures are being taken.

ZKSYNC安全團隊已經確定了一個受損的管理員帳戶，該帳戶控制了價值約500萬美元的ZK令牌，這是Zksync Airdrop的其餘無人認領的令牌。正在採取必要的安全措施。

All user funds are safe and have never been at risk. The zkSync...

所有用戶資金都是安全的，從未有風險。 zksync ...

— zkSync (∎, ∆) (@zksync) April 15, 2025

- Zksync（∎，∆）（@zksync）2025年4月15日

The team highlighted that the exploit only impacted the airdrop contract and did not affect the broader ZKSync protocol, the ZK token smart contract, or user wallets. According to them, security teams have already initiated emergency protocols, and a complete investigation is underway to determine the full scope of the breach.

該團隊強調，漏洞利用只會影響空調合同，並不會影響更廣泛的ZKSYNC協議，ZK代幣智能合約或用戶錢包。據他們說，安全團隊已經啟動了緊急協議，並且正在進行全面調查以確定違規的全部範圍。

As the core infrastructure remains unaffected, the market reaction was swift. Within a 30-minute window, ZK token’s price plummeted from $0.0478 to $0.0396—a 17% drop that rattled holders and traders.

由於核心基礎設施不受影響，市場反應迅速。在一個30分鐘的窗口中，ZK令牌的價格從0.0478美元下降到0.0396美元，這是17％的跌落者和交易者。

Although the asset showed signs of recovery, rebounding to $0.0441, the sentiment remains bearish. Additionally, the Relative Volatility Index (RVI), a metric for tracking price turbulence, surged from 18.68 to 72.81 within an hour.

儘管資產顯示出恢復的跡象，反彈至0.0441美元，但情緒仍然是看跌。此外，跟踪價格湍流的相對波動率指數（RVI）在一個小時內從18.68升至72.81。

This incident has sparked heated discussions among zkSync’s community members, many of whom have voiced their frustrations since the controversial airdrop.

這一事件引發了ZKSYNC社區成員的激烈討論，自備受爭議的空投以來，其中許多人表達了他們的挫敗感。

Pseudonymous commentator Hanky Pym expressed his criticisms, comparing zkSync’s trajectory to that of Mantra’s OM token, which faced a 98% price collapse. Pym claimed the team misused its substantial funding of around $400 million and slammed them for what he perceives as deceitful behavior.

化名評論員Hanky Pym表達了他的批評，將Zksync的軌跡與Mantra的OM令牌進行了比較，後者面臨98％的價格崩潰。 Pym聲稱該團隊濫用了大約4億美元的大量資金，並以他認為欺騙性的行為抨擊了他們。

Another member of the community pointed out a contradiction in zkSync’s narrative. The user questioned the legitimacy of the hack, suggesting it might be part of a larger trend where projects exploit the “we were hacked” narrative to cover questionable actions.

社區的另一個成員指出了Zksync的敘述中的矛盾。用戶質疑了黑客的合法性，這表明它可能是一個更大趨勢的一部分，即項目利用“我們被黑客入侵”的敘述來涵蓋可疑的動作。

Meanwhile, Zener, founder of the Web3 infrastructure project Modularity, also intervened, stating that zkSync had essentially severed its ties with the community. He further asserted that the project’s credibility has reached zero.

同時，Web3基礎架構項目模塊化的創始人齊納（Zener）也進行了乾預，並指出Zksync基本上已經切斷了與社區的聯繫。他進一步斷言該項目的信譽已達到零。

The once-promising @zksync has officially turned its back on the community—and with that, its relevance ends here. It’s time to return the $ZK ticker to its rightful owner, @PolyhedraZK. Let’s not forget the blatant insult delivered through their insider-driven airdrop.

曾經曾經有過興起的@zksync已正式拒絕了社區，其相關性在這裡結束。現在該將$ ZK股票的股票返還給其應有的所有者@polyhedrazk。讓我們不要忘記通過其內部驅動的空投傳遞的公然侮辱。

— Zener (@zenerbabax) April 15, 2025

- Zener（@zenerbabax）2025年4月15日

This incident adds another layer of complication to ZKSync’s journey, which has been subject to scrutiny since its controversial airdrop rollout in June 2024.

這一事件增加了Zksync的旅程的另一層並發症，自2024年6月的Airdrop推出以來，該事件一直受到審查。

Designed to reward early adopters and ecosystem participants, the airdrop allocated 3.675 billion ZK tokens, 17.5% of the total 21 billion supply, to 695,232 wallet addresses. This selection represented only about 10% of all active wallets on the network.

旨在獎勵早期採用者和生態系統參與者，Airdrop分配了367.5億個ZK代幣，佔210億個供應量的17.5％，達到695,232個錢包地址。此選擇僅代表網絡上所有活動錢包的10％。

However, the distribution process faced criticism for its uneven allocation. While eligible wallets received anywhere between 450 and 100,000 ZK tokens, more than half of the entire airdrop ended up in the hands of less than 1% of participants.

但是，分銷過程因其不平衡的分配而面臨批評。雖然合格的錢包收到了450至100,000個ZK代幣的任何地方，但整個空調中有一半以上的參與者落入了不到1％的參與者手中。

The situation was further exacerbated by vulnerabilities in Sybil attack prevention. Several users manipulated the eligibility system using multiple wallets, effectively gaming the airdrop. Notably, one individual reportedly secured over 3 million ZK tokens through 85 separate wallets.

Sybil攻擊預防中的漏洞進一步加劇了這種情況。一些用戶使用多個錢包操縱了資格系統，有效地遊戲了空調。值得注意的是，據報導，一個人通過85個單獨的錢包獲得了超過300萬個ZK令牌。