XRPL联合创始人提出Hooks和Codii令牌来增强交易功能

在最近关于 XRP Ledger (XRPL) 可编程性未来的讨论中，Evernode 联合创始人 Scott Chamberlain 提出了一种涉及 Hooks 和新代币的新方法

A recent discussion about the future of XRP programmability has seen Evernode co-founder Scott Chamberlain propose a novel approach involving Hooks and a new token, Codii. The goal is to enhance transaction functionality on the XRP Ledger (XRPL) while keeping user costs manageable. This proposal aims to enable smart contract execution on the XRPL without overburdening users.

最近关于 XRP 可编程性未来的讨论中，Evernode 联合创始人 Scott Chamberlain 提出了一种涉及 Hooks 和新代币 Codii 的新颖方法。目标是增强 XRP Ledger (XRPL) 上的交易功能，同时保持用户成本可控。该提案旨在使智能合约能够在 XRPL 上执行，而不会给用户带来过多负担。

Chamberlain's proposal introduces two crucial elements. First, Hooks is a flexible and low-cost system that has been successfully used to support decentralized applications, such as Evernode. The system automates various tasks, including registration, reputation scoring, and governance for network hosts, providing a seamless solution for executing transactions on the XRPL.

张伯伦的提议引入了两个关键要素。首先，Hooks 是一个灵活且低成本的系统，已成功用于支持去中心化应用程序，例如 Evernode。该系统可自动执行各种任务，包括注册、声誉评分和网络主机治理，为在 XRPL 上执行交易提供无缝解决方案。

Second, Codii is a native token that would be minted from locked XRP and burned to pay for Hook-related fees. This mechanism is designed to reduce the financial burden on users compared to burning XRP directly for smart contract triggers.

其次，Codii 是一种原生代币，可以从锁定的 XRP 中铸造并销毁以支付 Hook 相关费用。与直接燃烧 XRP 来触发智能合约相比，该机制旨在减轻用户的经济负担。

Chamberlain's proposal sparked a response from Ripple CTO David Schwartz, who questioned the need for such complexity. According to Schwartz, simply burning XRP for all transaction fees, as is currently done on the XRPL, would streamline operations and make the system more accessible. He expressed skepticism about the benefits of introducing Codii, highlighting that it adds burdens like managing two tokens and could lead to dilution losses for XRP holders.

张伯伦的提议引发了 Ripple 首席技术官 David Schwartz 的回应，他质疑如此复杂的必要性。 Schwartz 表示，像目前 XRPL 上所做的那样，简单地燃烧 XRP 来支付所有交易费用，将简化操作并使系统更易于访问。他对引入 Codii 的好处表示怀疑，强调它增加了管理两种代币等负担，并可能导致 XRP 持有者的稀释损失。

"This seems way overcomplicated for no benefit. What advantage does this have over just burning XRP for all transaction fees?" asked Schwartz.

“这似乎过于复杂，没有任何好处。这与仅仅燃烧 XRP 来支付所有交易费用相比有什么优势？”施瓦茨问道。

Chamberlain defended the proposal by arguing that burning XRP for programmability would make smart contracts too expensive if XRP appreciates. He highlighted that Codii would offer a self-sustaining system, where XRP holders could effectively cover Hook fees through inflationary balance adjustments.

张伯伦为该提案辩护，认为如果 XRP 升值，为了可编程性而销毁 XRP 将使智能合约变得过于昂贵。他强调，Codii 将提供一个自我维持的系统，XRP 持有者可以通过通胀余额调整有效地支付 Hook 费用。

"The XRP burn model for transactions is simple and works well at low XRP prices. But it becomes prohibitively expensive for smart contracts if XRP goes up in value. Codii offers a self-sustaining model where XRP holders get inflationary balance adjustments to cover Hook fees," explained Chamberlain.

“用于交易的 XRP 销毁模型很简单，并且在较低的 XRP 价格下运行良好。但如果 XRP 价值上涨，对于智能合约来说，它会变得非常昂贵。Codii 提供了一种自我维持的模型，XRP 持有者可以通过通胀余额调整来支付 Hook 费用，”张伯伦解释道。

Despite Chamberlain's rationale, Schwartz maintained that any system imposing costs on users through token inflation risks complicating fee management without significant benefits. It was also outlined that burning XRP as the sole method for transaction funding keeps the system straightforward, ensuring its accessibility as the value of XRP changes.

尽管张伯伦有这样的理由，但施瓦茨坚持认为，任何通过代币通胀向用户强加成本的系统都有可能使费用管理复杂化，而没有显着的好处。还概述了燃烧 XRP 作为交易融资的唯一方法使系统保持简单，确保随着 XRP 价值的变化其可访问性。