XRPL聯合創始人提出Hooks和Codii令牌來增強交易功能

在最近關於 XRP Ledger (XRPL) 可編程性未來的討論中，Evernode 聯合創始人 Scott Chamberlain 提出了一種涉及 Hooks 和新代幣的新方法

A recent discussion about the future of XRP programmability has seen Evernode co-founder Scott Chamberlain propose a novel approach involving Hooks and a new token, Codii. The goal is to enhance transaction functionality on the XRP Ledger (XRPL) while keeping user costs manageable. This proposal aims to enable smart contract execution on the XRPL without overburdening users.

在最近關於 XRP 可編程性未來的討論中，Evernode 聯合創始人 Scott Chamberlain 提出了一種涉及 Hooks 和新代幣 Codii 的新穎方法。目標是增強 XRP Ledger (XRPL) 上的交易功能，同時保持使用者成本可控。該提案旨在使智能合約能夠在 XRPL 上執行，而不會給用戶帶來過多負擔。

Chamberlain's proposal introduces two crucial elements. First, Hooks is a flexible and low-cost system that has been successfully used to support decentralized applications, such as Evernode. The system automates various tasks, including registration, reputation scoring, and governance for network hosts, providing a seamless solution for executing transactions on the XRPL.

張伯倫的提議引入了兩個關鍵要素。首先，Hooks 是一個靈活且低成本的系統，已成功用於支援去中心化應用程序，例如 Evernode。該系統可自動執行各種任務，包括註冊、聲譽評分和網路主機治理，為在 XRPL 上執行交易提供無縫解決方案。

Second, Codii is a native token that would be minted from locked XRP and burned to pay for Hook-related fees. This mechanism is designed to reduce the financial burden on users compared to burning XRP directly for smart contract triggers.

其次，Codii 是一種原生代幣，可以從鎖定的 XRP 中鑄造並銷毀以支付 Hook 相關費用。與直接燃燒 XRP 來觸發智能合約相比，該機制旨在減輕用戶的經濟負擔。

Chamberlain's proposal sparked a response from Ripple CTO David Schwartz, who questioned the need for such complexity. According to Schwartz, simply burning XRP for all transaction fees, as is currently done on the XRPL, would streamline operations and make the system more accessible. He expressed skepticism about the benefits of introducing Codii, highlighting that it adds burdens like managing two tokens and could lead to dilution losses for XRP holders.

張伯倫的提議引發了 Ripple 首席技術長 David Schwartz 的回應，他質疑如此複雜的必要性。 Schwartz 表示，像目前 XRPL 上所做的那樣，簡單地燃燒 XRP 來支付所有交易費用，將簡化操作並使系統更易於存取。他對引入 Codii 的好處表示懷疑，強調它增加了管理兩種代幣等負擔，並可能導致 XRP 持有者的稀釋損失。

"This seems way overcomplicated for no benefit. What advantage does this have over just burning XRP for all transaction fees?" asked Schwartz.

“這似乎太複雜，沒有任何好處。這與僅僅燃燒 XRP 來支付所有交易費用相比有什麼優勢？”施瓦茨問。

Chamberlain defended the proposal by arguing that burning XRP for programmability would make smart contracts too expensive if XRP appreciates. He highlighted that Codii would offer a self-sustaining system, where XRP holders could effectively cover Hook fees through inflationary balance adjustments.

張伯倫為該提案辯護，認為如果 XRP 升值，為了可編程性而銷毀 XRP 將使智能合約變得過於昂貴。他強調，Codii 將提供一個自我維持的系統，XRP 持有者可以透過通膨餘額調整有效地支付 Hook 費用。

"The XRP burn model for transactions is simple and works well at low XRP prices. But it becomes prohibitively expensive for smart contracts if XRP goes up in value. Codii offers a self-sustaining model where XRP holders get inflationary balance adjustments to cover Hook fees," explained Chamberlain.

「用於交易的XRP 銷毀模型很簡單，並且在較低的XRP 價格下運作良好。但如果XRP 價值上漲，對於智慧合約來說，它會變得非常昂貴。Codii 提供了一種自我維持的模型，XRP 持有者可以透過通膨餘額調整來支付Hook 費用，」張伯倫解釋道。

Despite Chamberlain's rationale, Schwartz maintained that any system imposing costs on users through token inflation risks complicating fee management without significant benefits. It was also outlined that burning XRP as the sole method for transaction funding keeps the system straightforward, ensuring its accessibility as the value of XRP changes.

儘管張伯倫有這樣的理由，但施瓦茨堅持認為，任何透過代幣通膨向用戶強加成本的系統都有可能使費用管理複雜化，而沒有顯著的好處。還概述了燃燒 XRP 作為交易融資的唯一方法使系統保持簡單，確保隨著 XRP 價值的變化其可訪問性。