|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
在最近的 CryptoLaw 采访中,加密货币爱好者 James Murphy(又名 MetaLawMan)阐明了 SEC 在 Ripple 案件中的上诉。
In a recent CryptoLaw interview, crypto enthusiast James Murphy, also known as MetaLawMan, discussed the SEC’s appeal in the Ripple case. His interesting comparison of oranges and XRP in the context of the Howey Test caught the attention of the XRP community and sparked a discussion about XRP’s legal classification.
在最近的 CryptoLaw 采访中,加密货币爱好者 James Murphy(也称为 MetaLawMan)讨论了 SEC 在 Ripple 案件中的上诉。他在 Howey 测试中对橙子和 XRP 进行的有趣比较引起了 XRP 社区的注意,并引发了关于 XRP 法律分类的讨论。
XRP attorney Bill Morgan praised MetaLawMan on Twitter for his metaphorical explanation of XRP sales. According to Morgan, the analogy highlights the limitations of the Howey Test in addressing the complexities of “security issues arising from buying crypto and the development and operation of crypto markets.”
XRP 律师 Bill Morgan 在 Twitter 上称赞 MetaLawMan 对 XRP 销售的隐喻解释。摩根表示,这个类比凸显了豪伊测试在解决“购买加密货币以及加密货币市场的开发和运营所产生的安全问题”的复杂性方面的局限性。
That video was great. I always find the analogy to the Howey oranges and orange groves intriguing. @JohnEDeaton1 did it well. Your analogy of the wholesalers buying oranges from Howey and selling at a higher price into the markets with institutional buyers of XRP at a discount… https://t.co/w5TjkfDSSn pic.twitter.com/pxavy9lqsr
那个视频很棒。我总是觉得豪伊橙子和橙园的类比很有趣。 @JohnEDeaton1 做得很好。您将批发商从 Howey 购买橙子并以更高的价格出售给 XRP 的机构买家以折扣价出售到市场…… https://t.co/w5TjkfDSSn pic.twitter.com/pxavy9lqsr
Morgan’s post was inspired by a thread of MetaLawMan’s tweets on X, where he discussed the need for Ripple to appeal the SEC’s recent move. Specifically, MetaLawMan’s interview with attorney Kristi Warner resonated with Morgan, particularly the comparison between XRP transactions and orange sales.
Morgan 的帖子受到 MetaLawMan 在 X 上的一条推文的启发,他在推文中讨论了 Ripple 对 SEC 最近举措提出上诉的必要性。具体来说,MetaLawMan 对律师 Kristi Warner 的采访引起了摩根的共鸣,特别是 XRP 交易和橙子销售之间的比较。
In the analogy, wholesalers buy oranges from Howey at a discount and sell them for a profit, while Howey uses the funds for farming operations. However, the wholesalers do not share their profits with the wholesale seller. MetaLawMan drew parallels with XRP sales, where Ripple sells XRP to institutions at a discount, who then resell it on the market without sharing profits with Ripple.
打个比方,批发商以折扣价从 Howey 购买橙子并出售以获取利润,而 Howey 将所得资金用于农业经营。然而,批发商不与批发卖家分享利润。 MetaLawMan 与 XRP 销售进行了类比,Ripple 将 XRP 以折扣价出售给机构,然后机构在市场上转售,而不与 Ripple 分享利润。
Read also: Ripple Case: Lawyer Sees No Settlement with SEC Despite Ruling
另请阅读:Ripple 案:尽管有裁决,律师仍未与 SEC 达成和解
Here’s why I think @Ripple should file a cross-appeal. 👇 https://t.co/2nm0A2bnRt
这就是为什么我认为 @Ripple 应该提出交叉上诉。 👇 https://t.co/2nm0A2bnRt
While Ripple secured a substantial victory with Judge Analisa Torres’ final judgment, the SEC has filed an appeal. As anticipated by many, the decision will likely lead to a protracted legal battle. However, there is still hope for a settlement within the 14-day appeal period.
尽管 Ripple 凭借法官 Analisa Torres 的最终判决取得了实质性胜利,但 SEC 已提出上诉。正如许多人预期的那样,这一决定可能会导致一场旷日持久的法律战。不过,仍有希望在 14 天的上诉期内达成和解。
MetaLawMan also discussed potential aspects of Ripple’s appeal, suggesting it will probably focus on two main points: the legal status of XRP in secondary market sales and the absence of a disgorgement award. Judge Torres ruled that secondary XRP sales do not constitute securities transactions, which contradicts the SEC’s claims. Additionally, the SEC failed to identify specific victims to support a disgorgement order.
MetaLawMan 还讨论了 Ripple 上诉的潜在方面,表明它可能会关注两个要点:XRP 在二级市场销售中的法律地位以及没有返还裁决。托雷斯法官裁定,XRP 二次销售不构成证券交易,这与 SEC 的主张相矛盾。此外,美国证券交易委员会未能确定具体受害者来支持没收令。
The content presented in this article is solely for informational and educational purposes. It does not constitute financial advice or any other type of advice. Coin Edition is not liable for any losses incurred as a consequence of the use of the content, products, or services mentioned. Before making any decisions based on the company, readers are urged to conduct their own due diligence.
本文中提供的内容仅用于提供信息和教育目的。它不构成财务建议或任何其他类型的建议。对于因使用所提及的内容、产品或服务而造成的任何损失,Coin Edition 不承担任何责任。在根据公司做出任何决定之前,强烈建议读者进行自己的尽职调查。
免责声明:info@kdj.com
所提供的信息并非交易建议。根据本文提供的信息进行的任何投资,kdj.com不承担任何责任。加密货币具有高波动性,强烈建议您深入研究后,谨慎投资!
如您认为本网站上使用的内容侵犯了您的版权,请立即联系我们(info@kdj.com),我们将及时删除。