|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
在最近的 CryptoLaw 採訪中,加密貨幣愛好者 James Murphy(又名 MetaLawMan)闡明了 SEC 在 Ripple 案件中的上訴。
In a recent CryptoLaw interview, crypto enthusiast James Murphy, also known as MetaLawMan, discussed the SEC’s appeal in the Ripple case. His interesting comparison of oranges and XRP in the context of the Howey Test caught the attention of the XRP community and sparked a discussion about XRP’s legal classification.
在最近的 CryptoLaw 採訪中,加密貨幣愛好者 James Murphy(也稱為 MetaLawMan)討論了 SEC 在 Ripple 案件中的上訴。他在 Howey 測試中對橙子和 XRP 進行的有趣比較引起了 XRP 社區的注意,並引發了關於 XRP 法律分類的討論。
XRP attorney Bill Morgan praised MetaLawMan on Twitter for his metaphorical explanation of XRP sales. According to Morgan, the analogy highlights the limitations of the Howey Test in addressing the complexities of “security issues arising from buying crypto and the development and operation of crypto markets.”
XRP 律師 Bill Morgan 在 Twitter 上稱讚 MetaLawMan 對 XRP 銷售的隱喻解釋。摩根表示,這個類比凸顯了豪伊測試在解決「購買加密貨幣以及加密貨幣市場的開發和營運所產生的安全問題」的複雜性方面的局限性。
That video was great. I always find the analogy to the Howey oranges and orange groves intriguing. @JohnEDeaton1 did it well. Your analogy of the wholesalers buying oranges from Howey and selling at a higher price into the markets with institutional buyers of XRP at a discount… https://t.co/w5TjkfDSSn pic.twitter.com/pxavy9lqsr
那個視頻很棒。我總是覺得豪伊橘子和橙園的類比很有趣。 @JohnEDeaton1 做得很好。您將批發商從 Howey 購買橙子並以更高的價格出售給 XRP 的機構買家以折扣價出售到市場… https://t.co/w5TjkfDSSn pic.twitter.com/pxavy9lqsr
Morgan’s post was inspired by a thread of MetaLawMan’s tweets on X, where he discussed the need for Ripple to appeal the SEC’s recent move. Specifically, MetaLawMan’s interview with attorney Kristi Warner resonated with Morgan, particularly the comparison between XRP transactions and orange sales.
Morgan 的貼文受到 MetaLawMan 在 X 上的一條推文的啟發,他在推文中討論了 Ripple 對 SEC 最近舉措提出上訴的必要性。具體來說,MetaLawMan 對律師 Kristi Warner 的採訪引起了摩根的共鳴,特別是 XRP 交易和橙子銷售之間的比較。
In the analogy, wholesalers buy oranges from Howey at a discount and sell them for a profit, while Howey uses the funds for farming operations. However, the wholesalers do not share their profits with the wholesale seller. MetaLawMan drew parallels with XRP sales, where Ripple sells XRP to institutions at a discount, who then resell it on the market without sharing profits with Ripple.
打個比方,批發商以折扣價從 Howey 購買橙子並出售以獲取利潤,而 Howey 將所得資金用於農業經營。然而,批發商不與批發賣家分享利潤。 MetaLawMan 與 XRP 銷售進行了類比,Ripple 將 XRP 以折扣價出售給機構,然後機構在市場上轉售,而不與 Ripple 分享利潤。
Read also: Ripple Case: Lawyer Sees No Settlement with SEC Despite Ruling
另請閱讀:Ripple 案:儘管有裁決,律師仍未與 SEC 達成和解
Here’s why I think @Ripple should file a cross-appeal. 👇 https://t.co/2nm0A2bnRt
這就是為什麼我認為 @Ripple 應該提出交叉上訴。 👇 https://t.co/2nm0A2bnRt
While Ripple secured a substantial victory with Judge Analisa Torres’ final judgment, the SEC has filed an appeal. As anticipated by many, the decision will likely lead to a protracted legal battle. However, there is still hope for a settlement within the 14-day appeal period.
雖然 Ripple 憑藉法官 Analisa Torres 的最終判決取得了實質性勝利,但 SEC 已提出上訴。正如許多人預期的那樣,這項決定可能會導致一場曠日持久的法律戰。不過,仍有希望在 14 天的上訴期間達成和解。
MetaLawMan also discussed potential aspects of Ripple’s appeal, suggesting it will probably focus on two main points: the legal status of XRP in secondary market sales and the absence of a disgorgement award. Judge Torres ruled that secondary XRP sales do not constitute securities transactions, which contradicts the SEC’s claims. Additionally, the SEC failed to identify specific victims to support a disgorgement order.
MetaLawMan 也討論了 Ripple 上訴的潛在方面,表明它可能會關注兩個要點:XRP 在二級市場銷售中的法律地位以及沒有返還裁決。托雷斯法官裁定,XRP 二次銷售不構成證券交易,這與 SEC 的主張相矛盾。此外,美國證券交易委員會未能確定具體受害者來支持沒收令。
The content presented in this article is solely for informational and educational purposes. It does not constitute financial advice or any other type of advice. Coin Edition is not liable for any losses incurred as a consequence of the use of the content, products, or services mentioned. Before making any decisions based on the company, readers are urged to conduct their own due diligence.
本文中提供的內容僅用於提供資訊和教育目的。它不構成財務建議或任何其他類型的建議。對於因使用所提及的內容、產品或服務而造成的任何損失,Coin Edition 不承擔任何責任。在根據公司做出任何決定之前,強烈建議讀者進行自己的盡職調查。
免責聲明:info@kdj.com
所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!
如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。