Tron 在 SEC 诉讼驳回动议中进行强有力的辩护，谴责敲诈性的域外越权行为

Tron 已提出动议，驳回 SEC 对其提起的诉讼，称监管机构对主要是外国行为缺乏权力。 Tron 认为 SEC 的说法是“站不住脚的”，该公司坚称相关代币是在海外出售的，并且美国平台上的二级代币销售并非未注册的美国证券。 Tron 还辩称，SEC 没有提供具体事实来支持其指控，根据重大问题原则应驳回此案。

Tron Mounts Robust Defense in SEC Lawsuit Dismissal Motion, Denouncing SEC's Extraterritorial Overreach

Tron 在 SEC 诉讼驳回动议中进行强有力的辩护，谴责 SEC 的域外越权行为

In a resounding legal challenge, Tron, the entity behind the popular layer-1 blockchain, has filed a comprehensive motion to dismiss a lawsuit brought against it by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Tron contends that the SEC has grossly overstepped its authority by attempting to regulate predominantly foreign conduct, while also asserting that the agency's claims lack merit.

在一场响亮的法律挑战中，流行的第一层区块链背后的实体 Tron 已提交一项全面动议，驳回美国证券交易委员会 (SEC) 对其提起的诉讼。 Tron 辩称，美国证券交易委员会试图监管主要是外国的行为，严重越权，同时还声称该机构的主张缺乏依据。

SEC's Extraterritorial Ambitions Challenged

SEC 的域外野心受到挑战

Tron's motion, filed in a New York federal court, asserts that the SEC lacks the legal authority to enforce U.S. securities laws against largely foreign conduct. Tron emphasizes that the SEC's jurisdiction is not global and that its attempt to apply these laws extraterritorially is an excessive and unwarranted expansion of its authority.

Tron 向纽约联邦法院提交的动议声称，美国证券交易委员会缺乏针对外国行为执行美国证券法的法律权力。 Tron 强调，SEC 的管辖权不是全球性的，其试图在域外适用这些法律是对其权力的过度且无理的扩张。

"The SEC is not a worldwide regulator," Tron declares in its motion. "Its effort to apply U.S. security laws to predominantly foreign conduct goes too far."

“美国证券交易委员会不是一个全球性的监管机构，”波场在其动议中宣称。 “其将美国安全法适用于主要是外国行为的努力太过分了。”

Tron argues that the SEC's case is primarily focused on foreign digital asset offerings sold to foreign purchasers on global platforms, over which the SEC has no jurisdiction. The motion highlights that the tokens in question were sold overseas, with deliberate measures taken to avoid the U.S. markets. Tron also contends that the SEC has failed to allege that the tokens were initially offered or sold to U.S. residents.

Tron 认为，SEC 的案件主要集中在全球平台上向外国买家出售的外国数字资产产品，而 SEC 对此没有管辖权。该动议强调，相关代币在海外销售，并刻意采取措施避开美国市场。 Tron 还辩称，美国证券交易委员会未能指控这些代币最初是向美国居民提供或出售的。

SEC's Claims Deemed Tenuous

SEC 的主张被认为站不住脚

Furthermore, Tron dismisses the SEC's assertion that subsequent secondary token sales on U.S.-based platforms serving worldwide users constitute unregistered U.S. securities. Tron argues that even if the SEC had jurisdiction, the tokens do not qualify as investment contracts under the Howey test, the legal standard used to determine whether an asset is a security.

此外，Tron 驳斥了 SEC 的说法，即随后在为全球用户服务的美国平台上进行的二次代币销售构成了未注册的美国证券。 Tron 辩称，即使 SEC 拥有管辖权，这些代币也不符合 Howey 测试（用于确定资产是否为证券的法律标准）下的投资合约。

Tron also refutes the SEC's allegations of manipulative wash trading by Tron founder Justin Sun. The motion argues that the SEC has failed to provide specific evidence to support these claims and that the trades in question were legitimate and not intended to mislead or manipulate the market.

Tron 还驳斥了 SEC 对 Tron 创始人孙宇晨操纵洗盘交易的指控。该动议认为，SEC 未能提供具体证据来支持这些说法，并且相关交易是合法的，无意误导或操纵市场。

Additionally, Tron criticizes the SEC for failing to provide detailed factual allegations against each defendant. The motion contends that the SEC relies heavily on generalizations and conclusions, leaving Tron to speculate on the precise basis for the claims.

此外，Tron 批评 SEC 未能提供针对每位被告的详细事实指控。该动议认为，美国证券交易委员会严重依赖概括和结论，让 Tron 只能猜测这些说法的确切依据。

"For example, although the SEC purports to allege fraud, no material misstatement is alleged, leaving Defendants (and the Court) to speculate on the precise basis for those claims," Tron argues.

“例如，尽管美国证券交易委员会声称指控欺诈，但并未指控存在重大错误陈述，这使得被告（和法院）只能猜测这些指控的确切依据，”波场辩称。

Major Questions Doctrine Invoked

引用的主要问题学说

Tron's motion also asserts that the case should be dismissed under the "major questions doctrine," a legal principle established by the Supreme Court that limits the authority of agencies to regulate complex issues without clear congressional authorization. Tron argues that this doctrine applies to the SEC's attempt to regulate digital assets, as Congress has not explicitly granted the agency such authority.

Tron 的动议还声称，应根据“重大问题原则”驳回此案，这是最高法院制定的一项法律原则，限制各机构在未经国会明确授权的情况下监管复杂问题的权力。 Tron 认为，这一原则适用于 SEC 监管数字资产的尝试，因为国会尚未明确授予该机构此类权力。

"Congress has not authorized the SEC to regulate digital assets or to apply U.S. securities laws to predominantly foreign conduct," Tron maintains.

Tron 坚称：“国会尚未授权 SEC 监管数字资产或将美国证券法适用于主要是外国的行为。”

SEC Lawsuit Background

SEC 诉讼背景

The SEC filed its lawsuit against Tron in March 2023, alleging that the company and its founder, Justin Sun, engaged in illegal securities offerings and misleading promotions of Tron tokens. The lawsuit also accuses Sun of using celebrities to promote the tokens without disclosing his involvement.

美国证券交易委员会 (SEC) 于 2023 年 3 月对 Tron 提起诉讼，指控该公司及其创始人孙宇晨参与非法证券发行和 Tron 代币的误导性促销活动。该诉讼还指控 Sun 利用名人来推广这些代币，但没有透露他的参与情况。

Investment Disclaimer

投资免责声明

Please note that this news article does not constitute investment advice. Readers should always conduct their own independent research and consult with qualified professionals before making any investment decisions.

请注意，本文不构成投资建议。在做出任何投资决定之前，读者应始终进行自己的独立研究并咨询合格的专业人士。