Tron 在 SEC 訴訟駁回動議中進行強有力的辯護，譴責敲詐性的域外越權行為

Tron 已提出動議，駁回 SEC 對其提起的訴訟，稱監管機構對主要是外國行為缺乏權力。 Tron 認為 SEC 的說法是“站不住腳的”，該公司堅稱相關代幣是在海外出售的，並且美國平台上的二級代幣銷售並非未註冊的美國證券。 Tron 也辯稱，SEC 沒有提供具體事實來支持其指控，根據重大問題原則應駁回此案。

Tron Mounts Robust Defense in SEC Lawsuit Dismissal Motion, Denouncing SEC's Extraterritorial Overreach

Tron 在 SEC 訴訟駁回動議中進行強有力的辯護，譴責 SEC 的域外越權行為

In a resounding legal challenge, Tron, the entity behind the popular layer-1 blockchain, has filed a comprehensive motion to dismiss a lawsuit brought against it by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Tron contends that the SEC has grossly overstepped its authority by attempting to regulate predominantly foreign conduct, while also asserting that the agency's claims lack merit.

在一場響亮的法律挑戰中，流行的第一層區塊鏈背後的實體 Tron 已提交一項全面動議，駁回美國證券交易委員會 (SEC) 對其提起的訴訟。 Tron 辯稱，美國證券交易委員會試圖監管主要是外國的行為，嚴重越權，同時也聲稱該機構的主張缺乏依據。

SEC's Extraterritorial Ambitions Challenged

SEC 的域外野心受到挑戰

Tron's motion, filed in a New York federal court, asserts that the SEC lacks the legal authority to enforce U.S. securities laws against largely foreign conduct. Tron emphasizes that the SEC's jurisdiction is not global and that its attempt to apply these laws extraterritorially is an excessive and unwarranted expansion of its authority.

Tron 向紐約聯邦法院提交的動議聲稱，美國證券交易委員會缺乏針對外國行為執行美國證券法的法律權力。 Tron 強調，SEC 的管轄權不是全球性的，其試圖在域外適用這些法律是對其權力的過度且無理的擴張。

"The SEC is not a worldwide regulator," Tron declares in its motion. "Its effort to apply U.S. security laws to predominantly foreign conduct goes too far."

「美國證券交易委員會不是一個全球性的監管機構，」波場在其動議中宣稱。 “其將美國安全法適用於主要是外國行為的努力太過分了。”

Tron argues that the SEC's case is primarily focused on foreign digital asset offerings sold to foreign purchasers on global platforms, over which the SEC has no jurisdiction. The motion highlights that the tokens in question were sold overseas, with deliberate measures taken to avoid the U.S. markets. Tron also contends that the SEC has failed to allege that the tokens were initially offered or sold to U.S. residents.

Tron 認為，SEC 的案件主要集中在全球平台上向外國買家出售的外國數位資產產品，而 SEC 對此沒有管轄權。動議強調，相關代幣在海外銷售，並刻意採取措施避開美國市場。 Tron 還辯稱，美國證券交易委員會未能指控這些代幣最初是向美國居民提供或出售的。

SEC's Claims Deemed Tenuous

SEC 的主張被認為站不住腳

Furthermore, Tron dismisses the SEC's assertion that subsequent secondary token sales on U.S.-based platforms serving worldwide users constitute unregistered U.S. securities. Tron argues that even if the SEC had jurisdiction, the tokens do not qualify as investment contracts under the Howey test, the legal standard used to determine whether an asset is a security.

此外，Tron 駁斥了 SEC 的說法，即隨後在為全球用戶服務的美國平台上進行的二次代幣銷售構成了未註冊的美國證券。 Tron 辯稱，即使 SEC 擁有管轄權，這些代幣也不符合 Howey 測試（用於確定資產是否為證券的法律標準）下的投資合約。

Tron also refutes the SEC's allegations of manipulative wash trading by Tron founder Justin Sun. The motion argues that the SEC has failed to provide specific evidence to support these claims and that the trades in question were legitimate and not intended to mislead or manipulate the market.

Tron 也駁斥了 SEC 對 Tron 創始人孫宇晨操縱洗盤交易的指控。該動議認為，SEC 未能提供具體證據來支持這些說法，且相關交易是合法的，無意誤導或操縱市場。

Additionally, Tron criticizes the SEC for failing to provide detailed factual allegations against each defendant. The motion contends that the SEC relies heavily on generalizations and conclusions, leaving Tron to speculate on the precise basis for the claims.

此外，Tron 批評 SEC 未能提供每位被告的詳細事實指控。動議認為，美國證券交易委員會嚴重依賴概括和結論，讓 Tron 只能猜測這些說法的確切依據。

"For example, although the SEC purports to allege fraud, no material misstatement is alleged, leaving Defendants (and the Court) to speculate on the precise basis for those claims," Tron argues.

「例如，儘管美國證券交易委員會聲稱指控欺詐，但並未指控存在重大錯誤陳述，這使得被告（和法院）只能猜測這些指控的確切依據，」波場辯稱。

Major Questions Doctrine Invoked

引用的主要問題學說

Tron's motion also asserts that the case should be dismissed under the "major questions doctrine," a legal principle established by the Supreme Court that limits the authority of agencies to regulate complex issues without clear congressional authorization. Tron argues that this doctrine applies to the SEC's attempt to regulate digital assets, as Congress has not explicitly granted the agency such authority.

Tron 的動議還聲稱，應根據「重大問題原則」駁回此案，這是最高法院制定的一項法律原則，限制各機構在未經國會明確授權的情況下監管複雜問題的權力。 Tron 認為，這項原則適用於 SEC 監管數位資產的嘗試，因為國會尚未明確授予該機構此類權力。

"Congress has not authorized the SEC to regulate digital assets or to apply U.S. securities laws to predominantly foreign conduct," Tron maintains.

Tron 堅稱：“國會尚未授權 SEC 監管數位資產或將美國證券法適用於主要是外國的行為。”

SEC Lawsuit Background

SEC 訴訟背景

The SEC filed its lawsuit against Tron in March 2023, alleging that the company and its founder, Justin Sun, engaged in illegal securities offerings and misleading promotions of Tron tokens. The lawsuit also accuses Sun of using celebrities to promote the tokens without disclosing his involvement.

美國證券交易委員會 (SEC) 於 2023 年 3 月對 Tron 提起訴訟，指控該公司及其創始人孫宇晨參與非法證券發行和 Tron 代幣的誤導性促銷活動。該訴訟還指控 Sun 利用名人來推廣這些代幣，但沒有透露他的參與情況。

Investment Disclaimer

投資免責聲明

Please note that this news article does not constitute investment advice. Readers should always conduct their own independent research and consult with qualified professionals before making any investment decisions.

請注意，本文不構成投資建議。在做出任何投資決定之前，讀者應始終進行自己的獨立研究並諮詢合格的專業人士。