bitcoin
bitcoin

$76225.79 USD 

0.39%

ethereum
ethereum

$2931.65 USD 

3.29%

tether
tether

$1.00 USD 

-0.04%

solana
solana

$199.95 USD 

4.27%

bnb
bnb

$596.75 USD 

-0.09%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999868 USD 

0.00%

xrp
xrp

$0.551004 USD 

0.39%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.196590 USD 

2.57%

cardano
cardano

$0.445623 USD 

16.16%

tron
tron

$0.161249 USD 

0.72%

toncoin
toncoin

$4.95 USD 

0.97%

avalanche
avalanche

$27.93 USD 

3.07%

shiba-inu
shiba-inu

$0.000019 USD 

0.84%

chainlink
chainlink

$13.28 USD 

7.45%

bitcoin-cash
bitcoin-cash

$373.49 USD 

-1.79%

加密货币新闻

Tron 与 SEC:法律之战重塑加密货币监管格局

2024/04/02 04:02

在一场备受瞩目的诉讼中,Tron (TRX) 和 BitTorrent (BTT) 代币挑战 SEC 对其活动的监管权限,指控 SEC 越权且缺乏明确的加密货币监管。 Tron 辩称,SEC 的管辖权并不延伸到外交事务和全球数字货币,并且代币不应被归类为证券,理由是缺乏指导和限制监管权力的“重大问题主义”。

Tron 与 SEC:法律之战重塑加密货币监管格局

Tron vs. SEC: A Legal Battle Shaping the Crypto Regulatory Landscape

Tron 与 SEC:一场塑造加密货币监管格局的法律战

The Tron vs. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) lawsuit has ignited a heated debate over the regulation of digital assets and the boundaries of regulatory authority. This legal battle has far-reaching implications for the future of cryptocurrency and its impact on global markets.

Tron诉美国证券交易委员会(SEC)诉讼引发了关于数字资产监管和监管权限边界的激烈争论。这场法律战对加密货币的未来及其对全球市场的影响具有深远的影响。

Tron's Legal Challenge to SEC Jurisdiction

Tron 对 SEC 管辖权的法律挑战

Tron, a prominent blockchain platform, has vehemently challenged the SEC's authority over its operations. In a motion filed on March 28, Tron asserted that the SEC's jurisdiction does not extend to its activities, which primarily involve social media promotions, contests, and token giveaways. Tron argues that these actions do not directly affect U.S. markets or investors.

著名的区块链平台 Tron 强烈挑战 SEC 对其运营的权威。在 3 月 28 日提交的动议中,Tron 声称 SEC 的管辖权并不延伸到其活动,这些活动主要涉及社交媒体促销、竞赛和代币赠品。 Tron 辩称,这些行动不会直接影响美国市场或投资者。

Furthermore, Tron disputes the SEC's classification of its TRX and BTT tokens as securities. It contends that the regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies is still in its infancy and that the SEC's approach is inconsistent with established legal principles.

此外,Tron 对 SEC 将其 TRX 和 BTT 代币归类为证券提出了异议。它认为加密货币的监管框架仍处于起步阶段,SEC 的做法不符合既定的法律原则。

SEC's Allegations and Celebrities' Involvement

美国证券交易委员会的指控和名人的参与

The SEC has accused Tron and its founder, Justin Sun, of engaging in wash trading and market manipulation. It alleges that Sun conducted over 600,000 fictitious trades to create an illusion of active trading and support the sale of $31 million worth of tokens.

美国证券交易委员会 (SEC) 指控波场 (Tron) 及其创始人孙宇晨 (Justin Sun) 参与清洗交易和市场操纵。据称,Sun 进行了超过 60 万笔虚构交易,以制造交易活跃的假象,并支持销售价值 3100 万美元的代币。

The lawsuit also implicates several celebrities, including Lindsay Lohan, Jake Paul, and Akon, who allegedly promoted TRX and BTT on social media without disclosing their financial ties to the company. The SEC claims that these undisclosed endorsements violated securities laws.

该诉讼还涉及包括林赛·罗韩 (Lindsay Lohan)、杰克·保罗 (Jake Paul) 和阿肯 ​​(Akon) 在内的几位名人,据称他们在社交媒体上宣传 TRX 和 BTT,但没有透露自己与该公司的财务关系。美国证券交易委员会声称这些未公开的背书违反了证券法。

Major Questions Doctrine and Regulatory Overreach

主要问题 原则和监管过度

Tron has invoked the legal doctrine of major questions to challenge the SEC's exercise of power. This doctrine holds that significant policy decisions should be made by Congress, not regulatory agencies. Tron argues that the SEC has overstepped its authority by expanding its regulatory reach without explicit authorization from Congress.

Tron援引重大问题的法律原则来挑战SEC的权力行使。该学说认为,重大政策决定应由国会而不是监管机构做出。 Tron 辩称,美国证券交易委员会在未经国会明确授权的情况下扩大监管范围,已经越权。

Implications for the Crypto Industry

对加密行业的影响

The outcome of the Tron vs. SEC lawsuit will have profound implications for the crypto industry. A ruling in favor of Tron would limit the SEC's ability to regulate digital assets, while a decision in favor of the SEC would strengthen its authority.

Tron 与 SEC 诉讼的结果将对加密行业产生深远影响。有利于 Tron 的裁决将限制 SEC 监管数字资产的能力,而有利于 SEC 的决定将加强其权威。

The case highlights the need for clear and transparent regulatory frameworks that protect investors, foster innovation, and promote the sustainable growth of the crypto market. The lack of a comprehensive regulatory regime has led to uncertainty and potential risks for investors and the industry as a whole.

该案例凸显了建立清晰透明的监管框架的必要性,以保护投资者、促进创新并促进加密货币市场的可持续增长。缺乏全面的监管制度给投资者和整个行业带来了不确定性和潜在风险。

Background of the Lawsuit

诉讼背景

The SEC initiated legal proceedings against Tron in March 2023, accusing it of violating the Securities and Exchange Commission Act. The lawsuit alleges that Tron misled investors by artificially inflating the value of TRX and conducting fraudulent activities.

美国证券交易委员会 (SEC) 于 2023 年 3 月对 Tron 提起法律诉讼,指控其违反《证券交易委员会法》。诉讼称,Tron 通过人为夸大 TRX 的价值并进行欺诈活动来误导投资者。

Conclusion

结论

The Tron vs. SEC lawsuit is a pivotal moment in the ongoing debate over the regulation of cryptocurrency. The outcome of this case will shape the regulatory landscape for digital assets and determine the extent of the SEC's authority. As the crypto industry continues to evolve, it is imperative to establish a balanced and effective regulatory framework that protects investors while allowing for innovation and growth.

Tron 与 SEC 的诉讼是有关加密货币监管的持续争论的关键时刻。此案的结果将塑造数字资产的监管格局并决定 SEC 的权力范围。随着加密货币行业的不断发展,必须建立一个平衡且有效的监管框架,在保护投资者的同时允许创新和增长。

免责声明:info@kdj.com

所提供的信息并非交易建议。根据本文提供的信息进行的任何投资,kdj.com不承担任何责任。加密货币具有高波动性,强烈建议您深入研究后,谨慎投资!

如您认为本网站上使用的内容侵犯了您的版权,请立即联系我们(info@kdj.com),我们将及时删除。

2024年11月08日 发表的其他文章