索拉纳（Solana）的高分奖励将为索尔（Sol）膨胀。

周四，改革区块链网络的慷慨通货膨胀制度的争议努力。

Solana (SOL) high-yield protocol is set to live to inflate another day after a contentious effort to reform the blockchain network's generous inflation regime flopped Thursday.

索拉纳（SOL）高收益协议将在周四改革区块链网络的慷慨通货膨胀制度的争议努力之后，将在第二天膨胀。

The surprise result will scuttle the first major attempt at lowering Solana's uncommonly high staking emissions. Among the most valuable programmable blockchains by market cap, Solana issues comparatively large sums of new tokens to its validators, the computer operations that power proof-of-stake blockchains.

令人惊讶的结果将使第一次降低索拉纳（Solana）罕见的高分排放量的重大尝试。在最有价值的可编程区块链中，索拉纳（Solana）向其验证者（其计算机操作）发出了相对较大的新令牌，即供电的电动证明区块链。

Those who prefer lower inflation rates – namely, large-scale SOL investors and leaders in the decentralized finance (DeFi) sector – banded together to form an alliance in support of slashing input prices.

那些喜欢降低通货膨胀率的人，即分散融资（DEFI）领域的大规模SOL投资者和领导者 - 团结起来，结盟以支持削减投入价格。

But their efforts ultimately failed to win over small-time operators, many of whom feared the effects of a big cut to their revenue. The opposition rallied hardest Thursday, as late-voting validators' ballots broke heavily in favor of "no."

但是他们的努力最终未能赢得小型运营商的胜利，其中许多人担心削减收入的影响。反对派在周四最艰难的是，随着迟来的验证者的选票大为破坏，支持“否”。

That was enough to scuttle the proposal, SIMD-0228, which ultimately failed to achieve the supermajority needed to pass.

这足以破坏提案，即Simd-0228，最终未能实现经过的超级欢乐。

Announced in late July, SIMD-0288 would have replaced Solana's static 4.7% annual SOL emissions with a dynamic system that adjusts to nudge staking trends up or down. Currently, Solana validators receive 4.7% of their staked SOL in new tokens each year, plus a small fee for each transaction processed.

Simd-0288于7月下旬宣布，将通过动态系统来代替Solana的4.7％年度SOL排放，以适应上升或下降的推动趋势。目前，Solana验证者每年收到其新令牌中的4.7％的固定液，并为处理的每笔交易收取少量费用。

The proposal's critics, in contrast, said it was reckless and rushed, and that its co-author, the influential investment company Multicoin Capital, had written it to favor its own interests.

相比之下，该提案的批评家说，它是鲁ck又匆忙的，其合着者是有影响力的投资公司Multicoin Capital，已写信给它以偏爱自己的利益。

Some also warned the proposal would disrupt elements of Solana's DeFi economy, or turn off institutional investors who were attracted to SOL's native yield.

一些人还警告说，该提案将破坏索拉纳（Solana）经济的要素，或者关闭被索尔（Sol）本地收益率吸引的机构投资者。

"Many people feel like SIMD-0228 is not the best proposal to address inflation on Solana," said SolBlaze, a validator operator.

验证者操作员Solblaze说：“许多人觉得SIMD-0228并不是解决Solana通货膨胀的最佳建议。”

"SIMD-0228 is a significant economic change, and changes on this scale deserve more time to discuss, analyze data, and iterate with feedback from different sectors of the ecosystem."

“ SIMD-0228是一个重大的经济变化，这种规模的变化值得更多时间讨论，分析数据并与来自生态系统不同部门的反馈进行迭代。”

The proposal's fate was decided by a vote among Solana's validators, who had a week to weigh in on the proposal and an attached SIMD focused on adjusting the network's minimum viable payload size.

该提案的命运是由Solana的验证者进行投票决定的，Solana的验证者有一个星期的权衡提案，而附属的SIMD则致力于调整网络的最低​​可行有效载荷规模。

Only a few types of changes require a vote among validators, and Thursday's vote was the third of its kind in the past year.

只有少数类型的更改需要在验证者之间进行投票，而周四的投票是过去一年中的第三次投票。

Whenever a proposal is put up for a vote, validators can choose to vote yes, abstein or no. A proposal needs a supermajority vote—at least two-thirds of the participating validators, holding at least three-fourths of the total voting power—to pass.

每当提出投票提案时，验证者都可以选择投票，是Abstein或否。一项提案需要超越的投票，至少有三分之二的参与验证者持有至少四分之三的投票权。

As of Thursday afternoon, 55% of participating validators voted no on SIMD-0228, while 45% voted yes. The no voters also held a larger share of the total voting power, with 57% compared to the yes voters' 43%.

截至周四下午，有55％的参与验证者对SIMD-0228进行了投票，而45％的人投票赞成。 NO选民在总投票权中也占有更大的份额，而YES选民的43％则为57％。

Out of the 1,299 validators who participated in the vote, 700 voted no on the proposal while 599 voted yes.

在参加投票的1,299名验证者中，有700票对该提案投了投票，而599票投票。

The results highlight a key division among smaller and larger validators.

结果突出了较小和较大的验证器之间的关键区域。

Out of the validators with 500,000 SOL or less, 60% voted no on the proposal while 40% voted yes. But among the validators with more than 500,000 SOL, 60% voted yes on the proposal while 40% voted no.

在有500,000 SOL或更少的验证者中，有60％的人对该提案投票否定，而40％的人投票赞成。但是，在有超过500,000元的验证者中，有60％的人对该提案投票赞成，而40％的投票则投票。

A final analysis from Flipside Crypto showed that a total of 1,300 validators participated in the vote, which mobilized an exceptionally high turnout.

Flipside Crypto的最终分析表明，共有1,300名验证者参加了投票，这使投票率异常高。

Out of the 1,300 validators, 66% cast votes and together they held 75% of the network's voting power. In a decentralized system like Solana's, voting is voluntary.

在1,300名验证者中，有66％的投票投票，共同拥有该网络投票权的75％。在像Solana这样的分散系统中，投票是自愿的。

The vote comes as Solana has struggled to reduce inflation despite the fact that it's a major topic of conversation among crypto traders and an area where Solana lags behind its competitors.

投票是因为索拉纳（Solana）努力减少通货膨胀，尽管这是加密货币交易者之间的主要话题，而索拉纳（Solana）落后于竞争对手，这是一个主要的对话。

Solana's architecture is set up so that new tokens are issued to validators in roughly equal amounts each year, even as the network's transaction activity and user base have grown in recent years.

建立了Solana的体系结构，以便每年向验证者发出新的代币，即使近年来该网络的交易活动和用户群增长，验证者也会大致相等。

The thinking among proponents of reducing inflation is that fewer tokens will lead to fewer sellers and less tax liability for those holding SOL.

支持通货膨胀的支持者中的思想是，较少的令牌将导致卖方更少，而持有SOL的人的税收责任则更少。

But opponents of the move, such as the DEFI STATION validator, said the proposal's authors—economic researcher Max Resnick and Multicoin Capital—were trying to rush it through.

但是，此举的反对者，例如Defi Station验证者，该提议的作者（经济研究员Max Resnick和Multicoin Capital）试图赶紧努力。

"It feels like we're being forced to make a quick decision on a proposal that could have a big impact on the ecosystem without enough time to fully discuss it and get feedback from different groups," DEFI STATION said in a statement earlier this week.

Defi Station在本周早些时候的一份声明中说：“感觉就像我们被迫对一项提案做出快速决定，该提案可能会对生态系统产生重大影响而没有足够的时间来完全讨论并获得不同群体的反馈。”

The proposal's critics also said it would disrupt elements of the Solana DeFi ecosystem

该提案的批评家还说，它将破坏Solana Defi生态系统的要素