索拉納（Solana）的高分獎勵將為索爾（Sol）膨脹。

週四，改革區塊鍊網絡的慷慨通貨膨脹制度的爭議努力。

Solana (SOL) high-yield protocol is set to live to inflate another day after a contentious effort to reform the blockchain network's generous inflation regime flopped Thursday.

索拉納（SOL）高收益協議將在周四改革區塊鍊網絡的慷慨通貨膨脹制度的爭議努力之後，將在第二天膨脹。

The surprise result will scuttle the first major attempt at lowering Solana's uncommonly high staking emissions. Among the most valuable programmable blockchains by market cap, Solana issues comparatively large sums of new tokens to its validators, the computer operations that power proof-of-stake blockchains.

令人驚訝的結果將使第一次降低索拉納（Solana）罕見的高分排放量的重大嘗試。在最有價值的可編程區塊鏈中，索拉納（Solana）向其驗證者（其計算機操作）發出了相對較大的新令牌，即供電的電動證明區塊鏈。

Those who prefer lower inflation rates – namely, large-scale SOL investors and leaders in the decentralized finance (DeFi) sector – banded together to form an alliance in support of slashing input prices.

那些喜歡降低通貨膨脹率的人，即分散融資（DEFI）領域的大規模SOL投資者和領導者 - 團結起來，結盟以支持削減投入價格。

But their efforts ultimately failed to win over small-time operators, many of whom feared the effects of a big cut to their revenue. The opposition rallied hardest Thursday, as late-voting validators' ballots broke heavily in favor of "no."

但是他們的努力最終未能贏得小型運營商的勝利，其中許多人擔心削減收入的影響。反對派在周四最艱難的是，隨著遲來的驗證者的選票大為破壞，支持“否”。

That was enough to scuttle the proposal, SIMD-0228, which ultimately failed to achieve the supermajority needed to pass.

這足以破壞提案，即Simd-0228，最終未能實現經過的超級歡樂。

Announced in late July, SIMD-0288 would have replaced Solana's static 4.7% annual SOL emissions with a dynamic system that adjusts to nudge staking trends up or down. Currently, Solana validators receive 4.7% of their staked SOL in new tokens each year, plus a small fee for each transaction processed.

Simd-0288於7月下旬宣布，將通過動態系統來代替Solana的4.7％年度SOL排放，以適應上升或下降的推動趨勢。目前，Solana驗證者每年收到其新令牌中的4.7％的固定液，並為處理的每筆交易收取少量費用。

The proposal's critics, in contrast, said it was reckless and rushed, and that its co-author, the influential investment company Multicoin Capital, had written it to favor its own interests.

相比之下，該提案的批評家說，它是魯ck又匆忙的，其合著者是有影響力的投資公司Multicoin Capital，已寫信給它以偏愛自己的利益。

Some also warned the proposal would disrupt elements of Solana's DeFi economy, or turn off institutional investors who were attracted to SOL's native yield.

一些人還警告說，該提案將破壞索拉納（Solana）經濟的要素，或者關閉被索爾（Sol）本地收益率吸引的機構投資者。

"Many people feel like SIMD-0228 is not the best proposal to address inflation on Solana," said SolBlaze, a validator operator.

驗證者操作員Solblaze說：“許多人覺得SIMD-0228並不是解決Solana通貨膨脹的最佳建議。”

"SIMD-0228 is a significant economic change, and changes on this scale deserve more time to discuss, analyze data, and iterate with feedback from different sectors of the ecosystem."

“ SIMD-0228是一個重大的經濟變化，這種規模的變化值得更多時間討論，分析數據並與來自生態系統不同部門的反饋進行迭代。”

The proposal's fate was decided by a vote among Solana's validators, who had a week to weigh in on the proposal and an attached SIMD focused on adjusting the network's minimum viable payload size.

該提案的命運是由Solana的驗證者進行投票決定的，Solana的驗證者有一個星期的權衡提案，而附屬的SIMD則致力於調整網絡的最低​​可行有效載荷規模。

Only a few types of changes require a vote among validators, and Thursday's vote was the third of its kind in the past year.

只有少數類型的更改需要在驗證者之間進行投票，而周四的投票是過去一年中的第三次投票。

Whenever a proposal is put up for a vote, validators can choose to vote yes, abstein or no. A proposal needs a supermajority vote—at least two-thirds of the participating validators, holding at least three-fourths of the total voting power—to pass.

每當提出投票提案時，驗證者都可以選擇投票，是Abstein或否。一項提案需要超越的投票，至少有三分之二的參與驗證者持有至少四分之三的投票權。

As of Thursday afternoon, 55% of participating validators voted no on SIMD-0228, while 45% voted yes. The no voters also held a larger share of the total voting power, with 57% compared to the yes voters' 43%.

截至週四下午，有55％的參與驗證者對SIMD-0228進行了投票，而45％的人投票贊成。 NO選民在總投票權中也佔有更大的份額，而YES選民的43％則為57％。

Out of the 1,299 validators who participated in the vote, 700 voted no on the proposal while 599 voted yes.

在參加投票的1,299名驗證者中，有700票對該提案投了投票，而599票投票。

The results highlight a key division among smaller and larger validators.

結果突出了較小和較大的驗證器之間的關鍵區域。

Out of the validators with 500,000 SOL or less, 60% voted no on the proposal while 40% voted yes. But among the validators with more than 500,000 SOL, 60% voted yes on the proposal while 40% voted no.

在有500,000 SOL或更少的驗證者中，有60％的人對該提案投票否定，而40％的人投票贊成。但是，在有超過500,000元的驗證者中，有60％的人對該提案投票贊成，而40％的投票則投票。

A final analysis from Flipside Crypto showed that a total of 1,300 validators participated in the vote, which mobilized an exceptionally high turnout.

Flipside Crypto的最終分析表明，共有1,300名驗證者參加了投票，這使投票率異常高。

Out of the 1,300 validators, 66% cast votes and together they held 75% of the network's voting power. In a decentralized system like Solana's, voting is voluntary.

在1,300名驗證者中，有66％的投票投票，共同擁有該網絡投票權的75％。在像Solana這樣的分散系統中，投票是自願的。

The vote comes as Solana has struggled to reduce inflation despite the fact that it's a major topic of conversation among crypto traders and an area where Solana lags behind its competitors.

投票是因為索拉納（Solana）努力減少通貨膨脹，儘管這是加密貨幣交易者之間的主要話題，而索拉納（Solana）落後於競爭對手，這是一個主要的對話。

Solana's architecture is set up so that new tokens are issued to validators in roughly equal amounts each year, even as the network's transaction activity and user base have grown in recent years.

建立了Solana的體系結構，以便每年向驗證者發出新的代幣，即使近年來該網絡的交易活動和用戶群增長，驗證者也會大致相等。

The thinking among proponents of reducing inflation is that fewer tokens will lead to fewer sellers and less tax liability for those holding SOL.

支持通貨膨脹的支持者中的思想是，較少的令牌將導致賣方更少，而持有SOL的人的稅收責任則更少。

But opponents of the move, such as the DEFI STATION validator, said the proposal's authors—economic researcher Max Resnick and Multicoin Capital—were trying to rush it through.

但是，此舉的反對者，例如Defi Station驗證者，該提議的作者（經濟研究員Max Resnick和Multicoin Capital）試圖趕緊努力。

"It feels like we're being forced to make a quick decision on a proposal that could have a big impact on the ecosystem without enough time to fully discuss it and get feedback from different groups," DEFI STATION said in a statement earlier this week.

Defi Station在本週早些時候的一份聲明中說：“感覺就像我們被迫對一項提案做出快速決定，該提案可能會對生態系統產生重大影響而沒有足夠的時間來完全討論並獲得不同群體的反饋。”

The proposal's critics also said it would disrupt elements of the Solana DeFi ecosystem

該提案的批評家還說，它將破壞Solana Defi生態系統的要素