比特币和以太坊治理之间的心理差异

试图弥合两个网络的真诚拥护者之间的差距，并展示两个最大的加密网络的开发流程对于长期成功的重要性。

As the leading two blockchains in the world, Bitcoin and Ethereum have both garnered a massive following among crypto enthusiasts. However, despite their shared goal of decentralization, the two networks differ greatly in their governance models and development processes. These differences have led to frequent debates and discussions within the crypto community, with each side highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of the other approach.

作为全球领先的两大区块链，比特币和以太坊都在加密货币爱好者中赢得了大批追随者。然而，尽管两个网络都有去中心化的共同目标，但它们的治理模式和开发流程却存在很大差异。这些差异导致了加密货币社区内频繁的辩论和讨论，双方都强调了对方方法的优点和缺点。

In this article, we will delve into the governance and development processes of Bitcoin and Ethereum, exploring their similarities and differences to gain a better understanding of how each network operates and evolves. We will also examine the psychological aspects that influence the participation and decision-making within these networks.

在本文中，我们将深入研究比特币和以太坊的治理和开发流程，探讨它们的异同，以更好地了解每个网络的运行和演变方式。我们还将研究影响这些网络内的参与和决策的心理方面。

At a glance: Bitcoin vs Ethereum governance

概览：比特币与以太坊治理

To provide a quick overview, here are some key points regarding the governance and development processes of Bitcoin and Ethereum:

为了提供快速概述，以下是有关比特币和以太坊治理和开发流程的一些要点：

Bitcoin governance is largely carried out by its community of users, developers and node operators through a decentralized and consensus-driven approach. There is no central authority or governing body that dictates changes to the Bitcoin protocol. Instead, proposed changes, known as Bitcoin Improvement Proposals (BIPs), are put forth by the community and undergo a lengthy and rigorous process of discussion, review, testing and eventual acceptance or rejection by the network participants. This decentralized governance mechanism aims to ensure that changes to the Bitcoin protocol are made in a transparent, inclusive and secure manner.

比特币治理主要由用户、开发者和节点运营商社区通过去中心化和共识驱动的方式进行。没有中央机构或管理机构来决定对比特币协议进行更改。相反，被称为比特币改进提案（BIP）的变更提议是由社区提出的，并经过漫长而严格的讨论、审查、测试以及网络参与者最终接受或拒绝的过程。这种去中心化的治理机制旨在确保以透明、包容和安全的方式对比特币协议进行更改。

In contrast to Bitcoin's decentralized governance, Ethereum governance is more centralized, with a greater reliance on a smaller set of core developers and the Ethereum Foundation (EF) in guiding the direction and development of the Ethereum protocol. While there is still a community of users, developers and node operators involved in the governance process, the ultimate decision-making power lies with the core developers and the EF. This centralized approach allows for quicker decision-making and implementation of changes to the Ethereum protocol, as compared to Bitcoin's more consensus-heavy and time-consuming governance process.

与比特币的去中心化治理相比，以太坊治理更加中心化，更多地依赖少数核心开发人员和以太坊基金会（EF）来指导以太坊协议的方向和发展。虽然仍然有用户、开发者和节点运营者社区参与治理过程，但最终的决策权掌握在核心开发者和 EF 手中。与比特币更加需要共识且耗时的治理流程相比，这种集中式方法可以更快地做出决策并实施对以太坊协议的更改。

Now, let's take a closer look at the governance and development processes of Bitcoin and Ethereum in more detail.

现在，让我们更详细地了解一下比特币和以太坊的治理和开发流程。

Bitcoin governance: A decentralized and community-driven approach

比特币治理：去中心化和社区驱动的方法

As mentioned earlier, Bitcoin governance is decentralized and largely carried out by its community of users, developers and node operators. This decentralized approach is in line with Bitcoin's overall ethos of minimizing central points of control and ensuring that the network remains true to its core principles and values.

如前所述，比特币治理是去中心化的，主要由用户、开发者和节点运营商社区执行。这种去中心化的方法符合比特币的整体精神，即最大限度地减少中心控制点并确保网络保持其核心原则和价值观。

The governance process in Bitcoin is largely driven by the community, with anyone being able to propose changes to the Bitcoin protocol through a Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP). These BIPs are then discussed, reviewed and tested by the community over a period of time, with feedback and input being gathered from various stakeholders in the Bitcoin ecosystem.

比特币的治理过程主要由社区驱动，任何人都可以通过比特币改进提案（BIP）对比特币协议提出更改。然后，社区会在一段时间内对这些 BIP 进行讨论、审查和测试，并从比特币生态系统中的各个利益相关者那里收集反馈和意见。

If a BIP gains sufficient support and consensus among the community, it may eventually be integrated into the Bitcoin protocol. However, this process is not without its challenges, as reaching consensus on technical and impactful changes to a decentralized network can be a complex and time-consuming endeavor.

如果BIP在社区中获得足够的支持和共识，它最终可能会被整合到比特币协议中。然而，这个过程并非没有挑战，因为就去中心化网络的技术和有影响力的改变达成共识可能是一项复杂且耗时的工作。

Despite the decentralized nature of Bitcoin governance, there are still certain individuals and groups that play a more influential role in the governance process. For instance, some core developers and long-standing community members may have a greater say in discussions and decisions due to their technical expertise, experience and contributions to the Bitcoin network.

尽管比特币治理具有去中心化的性质，但仍然有某些个人和团体在治理过程中发挥着更具影响力的作用。例如，一些核心开发人员和长期社区成员由于其技术专长、经验和对比特币网络的贡献，可能在讨论和决策中拥有更大的发言权。

Additionally, certain mining pools, which contribute to the security and block production of the Bitcoin network, may also have a degree of influence in the governance process, especially when it comes to matters related to mining and block rewards.

此外，某些有助于比特币网络安全和区块生产的矿池也可能对治理过程产生一定程度的影响，特别是在涉及挖矿和区块奖励相关事务时。

Overall, Bitcoin governance is a decentralized and consensus-driven process that aims to maintain the integrity, security and long-term sustainability of the Bitcoin network through the collective participation and decision-making of its community members.

总体而言，比特币治理是一个去中心化、共识驱动的过程，旨在通过社区成员的集体参与和决策来维护比特币网络的完整性、安全性和长期可持续性。

Ethereum governance: A centralized approach with a focus on rapid innovation

以太坊治理：专注于快速创新的集中式方法

Unlike Bitcoin's decentralized governance, Ethereum governance is more centralized, with a greater reliance on a smaller set of core developers and the Ethereum Foundation (EF) in guiding the direction and development of the Ethereum protocol.

与比特币的去中心化治理不同，以太坊治理更加中心化，更多地依赖少数核心开发人员和以太坊基金会（EF）来指导以太坊协议的方向和发展。

This centralized approach stems from Ethereum's early development, where a group of core developers, including Vitalik Buterin, were tasked with overseeing the development and governance of the Ethereum protocol. As the Ethereum ecosystem grew and expanded, the EF was established to further support and coordinate the development efforts.

这种中心化的方法源于以太坊的早期开发，包括 Vitalik Buterin 在内的一组核心开发人员负责监督以太坊协议的开发和治理。随着以太坊生态系统的发展和扩大，EF 的成立是为了进一步支持和协调开发工作。

While there is still a community of users, developers and node operators involved in the governance process, the ultimate decision-making power lies with the core developers and the EF. This centralized approach allows for quicker decision-making and implementation of changes to the Ethereum protocol, as compared to Bitcoin's more consensus-heavy and time-consuming governance process.

虽然仍然有用户、开发者和节点运营者社区参与治理过程，但最终的决策权掌握在核心开发者和 EF 手中。与比特币更加需要共识且耗时的治理流程相比，这种集中式方法可以更快地做出决策并实施对以太坊协议的更改。

However, it also raises concerns regarding the long-term sustainability and decentralization of the Ethereum network, especially if a small group of individuals or entities continue to wield a disproportionate influence over the governance and development of the protocol.

然而，它也引发了人们对以太坊网络的长期可持续性和去中心化的担忧，特别是如果一小群个人或实体继续对协议的治理和开发施加不成比例的影响力。

In recent years, there have been discussions and efforts within the Ethereum community to enhance the decentralization of the governance process. One notable initiative is the creation of the Ethereum Improvement Proposals (EIP) Editors, a

近年来，以太坊社区内部一直在讨论和努力加强治理流程的去中心化。一项值得注意的举措是创建以太坊改进提案（EIP）编辑器，