比特幣和以太坊治理之間的心理差異

試圖彌合兩個網路的真誠擁護者之間的差距，並展示兩個最大的加密網路的開發流程對於長期成功的重要性。

As the leading two blockchains in the world, Bitcoin and Ethereum have both garnered a massive following among crypto enthusiasts. However, despite their shared goal of decentralization, the two networks differ greatly in their governance models and development processes. These differences have led to frequent debates and discussions within the crypto community, with each side highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of the other approach.

作為全球領先的兩大區塊鏈，比特幣和以太坊都在加密貨幣愛好者中贏得了大批追隨者。然而，儘管兩個網路都有去中心化的共同目標，但它們的治理模式和開發流程卻存在很大差異。這些差異導致了加密貨幣社群內頻繁的辯論和討論，雙方都強調了對方方法的優點和缺點。

In this article, we will delve into the governance and development processes of Bitcoin and Ethereum, exploring their similarities and differences to gain a better understanding of how each network operates and evolves. We will also examine the psychological aspects that influence the participation and decision-making within these networks.

在本文中，我們將深入研究比特幣和以太坊的治理和開發流程，探討它們的異同，以便更好地了解每個網路的運作和演變方式。我們也將研究影響這些網絡內的參與和決策的心理層面。

At a glance: Bitcoin vs Ethereum governance

概覽：比特幣與以太坊治理

To provide a quick overview, here are some key points regarding the governance and development processes of Bitcoin and Ethereum:

為了提供快速概述，以下是有關比特幣和以太坊治理和開發流程的一些要點：

Bitcoin governance is largely carried out by its community of users, developers and node operators through a decentralized and consensus-driven approach. There is no central authority or governing body that dictates changes to the Bitcoin protocol. Instead, proposed changes, known as Bitcoin Improvement Proposals (BIPs), are put forth by the community and undergo a lengthy and rigorous process of discussion, review, testing and eventual acceptance or rejection by the network participants. This decentralized governance mechanism aims to ensure that changes to the Bitcoin protocol are made in a transparent, inclusive and secure manner.

比特幣治理主要由使用者、開發者和節點營運商社群透過去中心化和共識驅動的方式進行。沒有中央機構或管理機構來決定對比特幣協議進行更改。相反，被稱為比特幣改進提案（BIP）的變更提案是由社區提出的，並經過漫長而嚴格的討論、審查、測試以及網路參與者最終接受或拒絕的過程。這種去中心化的治理機制旨在確保以透明、包容和安全的方式對比特幣協議進行更改。

In contrast to Bitcoin's decentralized governance, Ethereum governance is more centralized, with a greater reliance on a smaller set of core developers and the Ethereum Foundation (EF) in guiding the direction and development of the Ethereum protocol. While there is still a community of users, developers and node operators involved in the governance process, the ultimate decision-making power lies with the core developers and the EF. This centralized approach allows for quicker decision-making and implementation of changes to the Ethereum protocol, as compared to Bitcoin's more consensus-heavy and time-consuming governance process.

與比特幣的去中心化治理相比，以太坊治理更加中心化，更依賴少數核心開發人員和以太坊基金會（EF）來指導以太坊協議的方向和發展。雖然仍有使用者、開發者和節點經營者社群參與治理過程，但最終的決策權掌握在核心開發者和 EF 手中。與比特幣更需要共識且耗時的治理流程相比，這種集中式方法可以更快地做出決策並實施對以太坊協議的變更。

Now, let's take a closer look at the governance and development processes of Bitcoin and Ethereum in more detail.

現在，讓我們更詳細地了解比特幣和以太坊的治理和開發流程。

Bitcoin governance: A decentralized and community-driven approach

比特幣治理：去中心化與社群驅動的方法

As mentioned earlier, Bitcoin governance is decentralized and largely carried out by its community of users, developers and node operators. This decentralized approach is in line with Bitcoin's overall ethos of minimizing central points of control and ensuring that the network remains true to its core principles and values.

如前所述，比特幣治理是​​去中心化的，主要由使用者、開發者和節點營運商社群執行。這種去中心化的方法符合比特幣的整體精神，即最大限度地減少中心控制點並確保網路保持其核心原則和價值。

The governance process in Bitcoin is largely driven by the community, with anyone being able to propose changes to the Bitcoin protocol through a Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP). These BIPs are then discussed, reviewed and tested by the community over a period of time, with feedback and input being gathered from various stakeholders in the Bitcoin ecosystem.

比特幣的治理過程主要由社群驅動，任何人都可以透過比特幣改進提案（BIP）對比特幣協議提出更改。然後，社群會在一段時間內對這些 BIP 進行討論、審查和測試，並從比特幣生態系統中的各個利害關係人收集回饋和意見。

If a BIP gains sufficient support and consensus among the community, it may eventually be integrated into the Bitcoin protocol. However, this process is not without its challenges, as reaching consensus on technical and impactful changes to a decentralized network can be a complex and time-consuming endeavor.

如果BIP在社群中獲得足夠的支持和共識，它最終可能會被整合到比特幣協議中。然而，這個過程並非沒有挑戰，因為就去中心化網路的技術和有影響力的改變達成共識可能是一項複雜且耗時的工作。

Despite the decentralized nature of Bitcoin governance, there are still certain individuals and groups that play a more influential role in the governance process. For instance, some core developers and long-standing community members may have a greater say in discussions and decisions due to their technical expertise, experience and contributions to the Bitcoin network.

儘管比特幣治理具有去中心化的性質，但仍有某些個人和團體在治理過程中發揮更具影響力的作用。例如，一些核心開發人員和長期社群成員由於其技術專長、經驗和對比特幣網路的貢獻，可能在討論和決策中擁有更大的發言權。

Additionally, certain mining pools, which contribute to the security and block production of the Bitcoin network, may also have a degree of influence in the governance process, especially when it comes to matters related to mining and block rewards.

此外，某些有助於比特幣網路安全和區塊生產的礦池也可能對治理過程產生一定程度的影響，特別是涉及挖礦和區塊獎勵相關事務時。

Overall, Bitcoin governance is a decentralized and consensus-driven process that aims to maintain the integrity, security and long-term sustainability of the Bitcoin network through the collective participation and decision-making of its community members.

總體而言，比特幣治理是​​一個去中心化、共識驅動的過程，旨在透過社群成員的集體參與和決策來維護比特幣網路的完整性、安全性和長期可持續性。

Ethereum governance: A centralized approach with a focus on rapid innovation

以太坊治理：專注於快速創新的集中式方法

Unlike Bitcoin's decentralized governance, Ethereum governance is more centralized, with a greater reliance on a smaller set of core developers and the Ethereum Foundation (EF) in guiding the direction and development of the Ethereum protocol.

與比特幣的去中心化治理不同，以太坊治理更加中心化，更依賴少數核心開發人員和以太坊基金會（EF）來指導以太坊協議的方向和發展。

This centralized approach stems from Ethereum's early development, where a group of core developers, including Vitalik Buterin, were tasked with overseeing the development and governance of the Ethereum protocol. As the Ethereum ecosystem grew and expanded, the EF was established to further support and coordinate the development efforts.

這種中心化的方法源自於以太坊的早期開發，包括 Vitalik Buterin 在內的一組核心開發人員負責監督以太坊協議的開發和治理。隨著以太坊生態系統的發展和擴大，EF 的成立是為了進一步支援和協調開發工作。

While there is still a community of users, developers and node operators involved in the governance process, the ultimate decision-making power lies with the core developers and the EF. This centralized approach allows for quicker decision-making and implementation of changes to the Ethereum protocol, as compared to Bitcoin's more consensus-heavy and time-consuming governance process.

雖然仍有使用者、開發者和節點經營者社群參與治理過程，但最終的決策權掌握在核心開發者和 EF 手中。與比特幣更需要共識且耗時的治理流程相比，這種集中式方法可以更快地做出決策並實施對以太坊協議的變更。

However, it also raises concerns regarding the long-term sustainability and decentralization of the Ethereum network, especially if a small group of individuals or entities continue to wield a disproportionate influence over the governance and development of the protocol.

然而，它也引發了人們對以太坊網路的長期可持續性和去中心化的擔憂，特別是如果一小群個人或實體繼續對協議的治理和開發施加不成比例的影響力。

In recent years, there have been discussions and efforts within the Ethereum community to enhance the decentralization of the governance process. One notable initiative is the creation of the Ethereum Improvement Proposals (EIP) Editors, a

近年來，以太坊社群內部一直在討論並努力加強治理流程的去中心化。一項值得注意的舉措是創建以太坊改進提案（EIP）編輯器，