|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
对斯旺诉讼的回应称,处于争议中心的矿业公司仅由该公司持有少数股权,而不是一家成熟的子公司。
A response filed by Proton Management to a lawsuit from Swan Bitcoin claims that the mining company at the center of the legal dispute is not fully owned by Swan.
Proton Management 对 Swan Bitcoin 的诉讼做出的回应称,处于法律纠纷中心的矿业公司并非 Swan 全资拥有。
According to Proton's legal counsel, Swan's so-called "mining business" is actually a separate entity named 2040 Energy, which is majority-owned by Tether and not by Swan. Proton's response argues that Swan only holds a minority stake in 2040 Energy.
Proton 的法律顾问表示,Swan 所谓的“挖矿业务”实际上是一个名为 2040 Energy 的独立实体,该实体的多数股权由 Tether 而不是 Swan 拥有。 Proton 的回应称,Swan 仅持有 2040 Energy 的少数股权。
“2040 Energy is not controlled by Swan, although Swan maintains a minority stake in the business,” the response states.
“2040 Energy 并不由 Swan 控制,尽管 Swan 保留该业务的少数股权,”回复称。
A spokesperson for Tether has previously denied any wrongdoing in the matter to CoinDesk.
Tether 发言人此前向 CoinDesk 否认在此事中存在任何不当行为。
Proton's response also claims that several key employees left Swan voluntarily due to their belief that the company was being mismanaged, and that these employees were subsequently hired by Proton to work on 2040 Energy.
Proton 的回应还声称,几名关键员工因认为公司管理不善而自愿离开 Swan,这些员工随后被 Proton 雇用到 2040 Energy 工作。
“In early August 2024, several key employees voluntarily resigned from Swan due to their belief that the company was being mismanaged,” the response states.
回复称:“2024 年 8 月上旬,几名关键员工因认为公司管理不善而自愿从 Swan 辞职。”
Proton argues that it is enhancing the value of Swan's minority stake in 2040 Energy through its actions.
Proton 辩称,它正在通过其行动提高 Swan 在 2040 Energy 少数股权的价值。
“Far from damaging Swan, Proton is enhancing the value of its minority stake in 2040 Energy,” Proton wrote in its filing.
Proton 在文件中写道:“Proton 不但没有损害 Swan,反而提高了 2040 Energy 少数股权的价值。”
Proton also denies using any of Swan's proprietary information or trade secrets, and argues that the information in question may belong to 2040 Energy rather than Swan.
Proton 还否认使用 Swan 的任何专有信息或商业秘密,并辩称相关信息可能属于 2040 Energy 而不是 Swan。
“Swan has suffered no damage by Proton's activities,” Proton states in its response.
“Swan 并未因 Proton 的活动而遭受任何损害,”Proton 在回应中表示。
Proton is also seeking dismissal of the case on the grounds that it was not properly served and that California courts do not have jurisdiction over Proton, which is a British Virgin Islands company with no commercial ties to California.
Proton 还寻求驳回此案,理由是该案没有得到妥善送达,而且加州法院对 Proton 没有管辖权,Proton 是一家英属维尔京群岛公司,与加州没有商业关系。
免责声明:info@kdj.com
所提供的信息并非交易建议。根据本文提供的信息进行的任何投资,kdj.com不承担任何责任。加密货币具有高波动性,强烈建议您深入研究后,谨慎投资!
如您认为本网站上使用的内容侵犯了您的版权,请立即联系我们(info@kdj.com),我们将及时删除。
-
- 尽管美联储主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔暗示降息,比特币市场仍继续下行趋势
- 2024-10-01 16:35:02
- 尽管美联储主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔暗示今年晚些时候可能降息,但包括比特币在内的加密货币市场周一仍继续下跌。
-
- 加纳将塞地锚定为黄金,提议副总统巴乌米亚
- 2024-10-01 16:30:01
- 将货币锚定于黄金意味着该货币的价值与特定数量的黄金直接挂钩。这个概念被称为黄金标准。