|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
對斯旺訴訟的回應稱,處於爭議中心的礦業公司僅由該公司持有少數股權,而不是一家成熟的子公司。
A response filed by Proton Management to a lawsuit from Swan Bitcoin claims that the mining company at the center of the legal dispute is not fully owned by Swan.
Proton Management 對 Swan Bitcoin 的訴訟做出的回應稱,處於法律糾紛中心的礦業公司並非 Swan 全資擁有。
According to Proton's legal counsel, Swan's so-called "mining business" is actually a separate entity named 2040 Energy, which is majority-owned by Tether and not by Swan. Proton's response argues that Swan only holds a minority stake in 2040 Energy.
Proton 的法律顧問表示,Swan 所謂的「挖礦業務」實際上是一個名為 2040 Energy 的獨立實體,該實體的多數股權由 Tether 而不是 Swan 擁有。 Proton 的回應稱,Swan 僅持有 2040 Energy 的少數股權。
“2040 Energy is not controlled by Swan, although Swan maintains a minority stake in the business,” the response states.
「2040 Energy 並不由 Swan 控制,儘管 Swan 保留該業務的少數股權,」回覆稱。
A spokesperson for Tether has previously denied any wrongdoing in the matter to CoinDesk.
Tether 發言人先前向 CoinDesk 否認在此事中存在任何不當行為。
Proton's response also claims that several key employees left Swan voluntarily due to their belief that the company was being mismanaged, and that these employees were subsequently hired by Proton to work on 2040 Energy.
Proton 的回應還聲稱,幾名關鍵員工因認為公司管理不善而自願離開 Swan,這些員工隨後被 Proton 僱用到 2040 Energy 工作。
“In early August 2024, several key employees voluntarily resigned from Swan due to their belief that the company was being mismanaged,” the response states.
回覆稱:“2024 年 8 月上旬,幾名關鍵員工因認為公司管理不善而自願從 Swan 辭職。”
Proton argues that it is enhancing the value of Swan's minority stake in 2040 Energy through its actions.
Proton 辯稱,它正在透過其行動提高 Swan 在 2040 Energy 少數股權的價值。
“Far from damaging Swan, Proton is enhancing the value of its minority stake in 2040 Energy,” Proton wrote in its filing.
Proton 在文件中寫道:“Proton 不僅沒有損害 Swan,反而提高了 2040 Energy 少數股權的價值。”
Proton also denies using any of Swan's proprietary information or trade secrets, and argues that the information in question may belong to 2040 Energy rather than Swan.
Proton 也否認使用 Swan 的任何專有資訊或商業機密,並辯稱相關資訊可能屬於 2040 Energy 而不是 Swan。
“Swan has suffered no damage by Proton's activities,” Proton states in its response.
「Swan 並未因 Proton 的活動而遭受任何損害,」Proton 在回應中表示。
Proton is also seeking dismissal of the case on the grounds that it was not properly served and that California courts do not have jurisdiction over Proton, which is a British Virgin Islands company with no commercial ties to California.
Proton 也尋求駁回此案,理由是該案沒有妥善送達,而且加州法院對 Proton 沒有管轄權,Proton 是一家英屬維京群島公司,與加州沒有商業關係。
免責聲明:info@kdj.com
所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!
如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。
-
- 儘管聯準會主席鮑威爾暗示降息,比特幣市場仍持續下行趨勢
- 2024-10-01 16:35:02
- 儘管聯準會主席鮑威爾暗示今年稍晚可能降息,但包括比特幣在內的加密貨幣市場週一仍繼續下跌。
-
- 加納將塞地錨定為黃金,提議副總統巴烏米亞
- 2024-10-01 16:30:01
- 將貨幣錨定於黃金意味著該貨幣的價值與特定數量的黃金直接掛鉤。這個概念被稱為黃金標準。