PI网络正在努力面临多重挑战

PI网络正在面临多重挑战，从KYC问题到用户兴趣下降，对PI的市场情绪正在逐渐消失。

Pi Network, the cryptocurrency network that has seen an underwhelming response despite its massive user base, is encountering multiple challenges.

PI Network是加密货币网络，尽管其用户群庞大，但仍遇到了多个挑战，但其响应却令人难以置信。

The network, which aims to introduce cryptocurrency to the masses, has seen its token fall below the crucial $1 mark from its all-time high of $3, leaving many Pioneers questioning its long-term potential.

该网络旨在将加密货币引入大众，它的代币降至至关重要的1美元以下，这是其历史最高高点的$ 3，这使许多先驱者质疑其长期的潜力。

While Pi Network has been expanding its ecosystem with projects like PiDaoSwap and the launch of .pi domains, concerns over the network’s structure have overshadowed its progress.

尽管PI网络一直通过PIDAOSWAP等项目和.pi域的发布来扩展其生态系统，但对网络结构的担忧却掩盖了其进度。

Now, fresh scrutiny over its SuperNodes has sparked debate over whether Pi Network is truly decentralized or just another centralized system in disguise.

现在，对其超节点的新审查引发了有关PI网络是否真正分散的或只是伪装的另一个集中式系统的辩论。

SuperNodes: A Centralization Problem?

超节点：集中化问题？

Pi Network claims to be a decentralized, community-driven project, but in reality, its core team (PCT) controls the SuperNodes that validate transactions. Unlike Bitcoin or Ethereum, where thousands of independent nodes secure the network, Pi’s system remains tightly managed.

PI Network声称是一个分散的社区驱动项目，但实际上，其核心团队（PCT）控制了验证交易的超节点。与比特币或以太坊不同，在数千个独立节点上保护网络的情况下，PI的系统仍然受到严格管理。

Initially, only three SuperNodes existed, all controlled by PCT in Canada and Finland. While the number has now grown to 42 as per Piscan.io, there’s little transparency.

最初，只有三个超节，全部由加拿大和芬兰的PCT控制。虽然现在的数字已经增长到42，但几乎没有透明度。

The team hasn’t shared a list of these SuperNodes or explained how they are selected, leaving many Pioneers confused about the process.

该团队尚未分享这些超节点的列表，也没有解释它们的选择方式，使许多先驱者对此过程感到困惑。

Community Frustration Reaches Boiling Point

社区挫败感到达沸点

However with the recent price drop, KYC details, controversy over its claims of decentralization. Many Pioneers are growing frustrated with the lack of rewards and participation opportunities.

但是，随着最近的价格下跌，KYC的细节，关于权力下放的主张的争议。许多开拓者对缺乏奖励和参与机会感到沮丧。

A Reddit post asking, “What is a SuperNode?” received vague responses from the team, only detailing their technical role without clarifying how one could become a SuperNode.

一篇Reddit帖子问：“什么是超级节点？”收到了团队的模糊回应，只能详细介绍他们的技术角色而不澄清如何成为超级节点。

On the other side, regular Pioneers who have been running nodes for months report no progress or rewards, further fueling skepticism. Some fear that only a select group with insider knowledge or powerful hardware can qualify, contradicting Pi Network’s vision of making crypto accessible to all.

另一方面，已经运行节点几个月的常规开拓者没有报告任何进步或奖励，从而进一步加剧了怀疑。有人担心只有一个具有内部知识或强大硬件的精选群体才能符合资格，这与Pi Network的愿景相矛盾，即使所有人都可以使用加密货币。

If participation is restricted, then is Pi Network really as decentralized as it claims to be?

如果参与受到限制，那么PI网络真的像声称的那样分散了吗？

Whom to Blame?

应该责怪谁？

Meanwhile, the Pi Network Core Team reassured users that they are working hard behind the scenes to give Pi the value it deserves. They blamed the price drop on Pioneers who are only selling Pi instead of buying.

同时，PI Network Core团队向用户保证，他们正在幕后努力工作，以使PI具有应有的价值。他们将价格下跌归咎于仅出售PI而不是购买的先驱者。

According to them, once people start buying, the price will surge.

据他们说，一旦人们开始购买，价格就会上涨。

Is Pi Network a Scam?

PI网络是骗局吗？

Crypto analyst Justin Bons, Founder & CIO of Cyber Capital, has openly called Pi Network a scam. He pointed out flaws in its technology, tokenomics, and centralization, arguing that Pi relies heavily on Stellar’s technology and lacks true decentralized finance (DeFi) potential.

Cyber​​ Capital的创始人＆CIO的加密分析师Justin Bons公开称为PI Network A Scam。他指出了其技术，令牌学和集中化的缺陷，认为PI在很大程度上依赖于Stellar的技术，并且缺乏真正的分散融资（DEFI）潜力。

Bons also criticized its mining model, likening it to a Ponzi scheme.

邦斯还批评其采矿模式，将其比作庞氏骗局。

For Pi Network to regain trust, PCT must address these concerns by making the SuperNode selection process transparent, publishing a list of approved nodes, and ensuring fair rewards for participants.

为了使PI网络重新获得信任，PCT必须通过使超级节点选择过程透明，发布批准的节点列表并确保参与者的公平奖励来解决这些问题。

Until then, doubts will continue to overshadow Pi’s vision, and its price may struggle to recover.

在此之前，怀疑将继续掩盖Pi的愿景，其价格可能难以恢复。