PI網絡正在努力面臨多重挑戰

PI網絡正在面臨多重挑戰，從KYC問題到用戶興趣下降，對PI的市場情緒正在逐漸消失。

Pi Network, the cryptocurrency network that has seen an underwhelming response despite its massive user base, is encountering multiple challenges.

PI Network是加密貨幣網絡，儘管其用戶群龐大，但仍遇到了多個挑戰，但其響應卻令人難以置信。

The network, which aims to introduce cryptocurrency to the masses, has seen its token fall below the crucial $1 mark from its all-time high of $3, leaving many Pioneers questioning its long-term potential.

該網絡旨在將加密貨幣引入大眾，它的代幣降至至關重要的1美元以下，這是其歷史最高高點的$ 3，這使許多先驅者質疑其長期的潛力。

While Pi Network has been expanding its ecosystem with projects like PiDaoSwap and the launch of .pi domains, concerns over the network’s structure have overshadowed its progress.

儘管PI網絡一直通過PIDAOSWAP等項目和.pi域的發布來擴展其生態系統，但對網絡結構的擔憂卻掩蓋了其進度。

Now, fresh scrutiny over its SuperNodes has sparked debate over whether Pi Network is truly decentralized or just another centralized system in disguise.

現在，對其超節點的新審查引發了有關PI網絡是否真正分散的或只是偽裝的另一個集中式系統的辯論。

SuperNodes: A Centralization Problem?

超節點：集中化問題？

Pi Network claims to be a decentralized, community-driven project, but in reality, its core team (PCT) controls the SuperNodes that validate transactions. Unlike Bitcoin or Ethereum, where thousands of independent nodes secure the network, Pi’s system remains tightly managed.

PI Network聲稱是一個分散的社區驅動項目，但實際上，其核心團隊（PCT）控制了驗證交易的超節點。與比特幣或以太坊不同，在數千個獨立節點上保護網絡的情況下，PI的系統仍然受到嚴格管理。

Initially, only three SuperNodes existed, all controlled by PCT in Canada and Finland. While the number has now grown to 42 as per Piscan.io, there’s little transparency.

最初，只有三個超節，全部由加拿大和芬蘭的PCT控制。雖然現在的數字已經增長到42，但幾乎沒有透明度。

The team hasn’t shared a list of these SuperNodes or explained how they are selected, leaving many Pioneers confused about the process.

該團隊尚未分享這些超節點的列表，也沒有解釋它們的選擇方式，使許多先驅者對此過程感到困惑。

Community Frustration Reaches Boiling Point

社區挫敗感到達沸點

However with the recent price drop, KYC details, controversy over its claims of decentralization. Many Pioneers are growing frustrated with the lack of rewards and participation opportunities.

但是，隨著最近的價格下跌，KYC的細節，關於權力下放的主張的爭議。許多開拓者對缺乏獎勵和參與機會感到沮喪。

A Reddit post asking, “What is a SuperNode?” received vague responses from the team, only detailing their technical role without clarifying how one could become a SuperNode.

一篇Reddit帖子問：“什麼是超級節點？”收到了團隊的模糊回應，只能詳細介紹他們的技術角色而不澄清如何成為超級節點。

On the other side, regular Pioneers who have been running nodes for months report no progress or rewards, further fueling skepticism. Some fear that only a select group with insider knowledge or powerful hardware can qualify, contradicting Pi Network’s vision of making crypto accessible to all.

另一方面，已經運行節點幾個月的常規開拓者沒有報告任何進步或獎勵，從而進一步加劇了懷疑。有人擔心只有一個具有內部知識或強大硬件的精選群體才能符合資格，這與Pi Network的願景相矛盾，即使所有人都可以使用加密貨幣。

If participation is restricted, then is Pi Network really as decentralized as it claims to be?

如果參與受到限制，那麼PI網絡真的像聲稱的那樣分散了嗎？

Whom to Blame?

應該責怪誰？

Meanwhile, the Pi Network Core Team reassured users that they are working hard behind the scenes to give Pi the value it deserves. They blamed the price drop on Pioneers who are only selling Pi instead of buying.

同時，PI Network Core團隊向用戶保證，他們正在幕後努力工作，以使PI具有應有的價值。他們將價格下跌歸咎於僅出售PI而不是購買的先驅者。

According to them, once people start buying, the price will surge.

據他們說，一旦人們開始購買，價格就會上漲。

Is Pi Network a Scam?

PI網絡是騙局嗎？

Crypto analyst Justin Bons, Founder & CIO of Cyber Capital, has openly called Pi Network a scam. He pointed out flaws in its technology, tokenomics, and centralization, arguing that Pi relies heavily on Stellar’s technology and lacks true decentralized finance (DeFi) potential.

Cyber​​ Capital的創始人＆CIO的加密分析師Justin Bons公開稱為PI Network A Scam。他指出了其技術，令牌學和集中化的缺陷，認為PI在很大程度上依賴於Stellar的技術，並且缺乏真正的分散融資（DEFI）潛力。

Bons also criticized its mining model, likening it to a Ponzi scheme.

邦斯還批評其採礦模式，將其比作龐氏騙局。

For Pi Network to regain trust, PCT must address these concerns by making the SuperNode selection process transparent, publishing a list of approved nodes, and ensuring fair rewards for participants.

為了使PI網絡重新獲得信任，PCT必須通過使超級節點選擇過程透明，發布批准的節點列表並確保參與者的公平獎勵來解決這些問題。

Until then, doubts will continue to overshadow Pi’s vision, and its price may struggle to recover.

在此之前，懷疑將繼續掩蓋Pi的願景，其價格可能難以恢復。