朝鲜黑客在 DeFi 协议 HyperLiquid 上清算了 50 万美元，但一些人认为这是一个“令人担忧的迹象”

虽然有些人会很高兴看到拉撒路集团的一些不义之财付诸东流，但其他人则认为这一活动是一个潜在的令人担忧的迹象。

North Korean hackers were liquidated for almost $500,000 on decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol HyperLiquid over the weekend, according to a post by MetaMask’s Taylor Monahan on X.

据 MetaMask 的 Taylor Monahan 在 X 上发布的帖子称，朝鲜黑客周末在去中心化金融 (DeFi) 协议 HyperLiquid 上被清算，损失近 50 万美元。

Monahan, who tracks Lazarus Group-linked addresses across the cryptosphere, flagged the activity on HyperLiquid, noting that “DPRK doesn’t trade. DPRK tests.”

莫纳汉在整个加密领域追踪拉撒路集团相关地址，他在 HyperLiquid 上标记了这一活动，并指出“朝鲜不进行交易。朝鲜进行测试。”

The Lazarus Group, also known as the Bureau 121, is a North Korean state-sponsored advanced persistent threat (APT) group. The group is known for its involvement in several high-profile cyberattacks, including the 2014 Sony Pictures hack and the 2017 WannaCry ransomware attack.

Lazarus 组织，也称为 121 局，是朝鲜国家支持的高级持续威胁 (APT) 组织。该组织因参与数起备受瞩目的网络攻击而闻名，包括 2014 年索尼影业黑客攻击和 2017 年 WannaCry 勒索软件攻击。

HyperLiquid is a decentralized exchange (DEX) that runs on its own network, built on top of Arbitrum, an L2 that itself settles to Ethereum mainnet.

HyperLiquid 是一个去中心化交易所 (DEX)，在自己的网络上运行，建立在 Arbitrum 之上，Arbitrum 是一个本身定居在以太坊主网的 L2。

In order to provide the low latency needed for the CEX-like speed of the exchange, the network relies on just four validators.

为了提供类似 CEX 的交易速度所需的低延迟，该网络仅依赖于四个验证器。

According to DeFi developer Cygaar, compromising three of these four would allow infiltrators to extract the 2.3 billion USDC backing the network.

据 DeFi 开发者 Cygaar 称，入侵这四项中的三项将允许渗透者提取支持网络的 23 亿美元 USDC。

Such an event would be far from the first time the Lazarus Group has managed to pull off something like this,

这样的事件远非 Lazarus Group 第一次成功完成这样的事情，

In 2022, the majority of the Ronin Bridge’s validator set was compromised, leading to over $600 million lost, and in October, Radiant Capital lost $50 million when a threshold of three of 11 multisig signers were duped into signing a malicious transaction.

2022 年，Ronin Bridge 的大部分验证器集遭到破坏，导致超过 6 亿美元的损失；10 月，当 11 个多重签名者中的 3 个被欺骗签署恶意交易时，Radiant Capital 损失了 5000 万美元。

At the time, concerns were raised over the sheer amount of value secured by often-times relatively few signatures, such as Blast’s three of five multisig securing $1.45 billion.

当时，人们对通常相对较少的签名所获得的巨大价值表示担忧，例如 Blast 的五个多重签名中的三个获得了 14.5 亿美元。

Some have urged calm, noting that bridging such a large chunk of funds would give time to interrupt the process, and that the primary backing asset, USDC, can be frozen by its issuer, Circle. “Rolling-back” the Arbitrum network in the event of an emergency was even floated as a last resort.

一些人敦促大家保持冷静，他们指出，桥接如此大笔资金将需要时间来中断这一过程，而且主要支持资产 USDC 可能会被其发行人 Circle 冻结。在紧急情况下“回滚”Arbitrum 网络甚至被认为是最后的手段。

However, others remain skeptical about both Circle’s response time, and Arbitrum’s willingness to roll-back “for anything less than an absolutely self-existential threat.”

然而，其他人仍然对 Circle 的响应时间和 Arbitrum 是否愿意“因为任何非绝对自我存在的威胁”而回滚表示怀疑。

A Dune dashboard monitoring USDC on Hyperliquid (by user hashed_official) shows current daily outflows of over 96 million USDC, though $2.24 billion remains in the bridge.

在 Hyperliquid 上监控 USDC 的 Dune 仪表板（由用户 hashed_official）显示，目前每日流出的 USDC 超过 9600 万美元，但仍有 22.4 亿美元留在桥中。

Since the generous launch of the HYPE token, HyperLiquid has been hailed as the darling of a resurgent DeFi sector.

自 HYPE 代币慷慨推出以来，HyperLiquid 被誉为复兴的 DeFi 领域的宠儿。

In response to Monahan’s post, some HyperLiquid holders have taken to minimizing the concerns as FUD designed to sell security services, or even questioning the timing of the warning, which coincides with HYPE’s first major dip in a month of up-only.

为了回应 Monahan 的帖子，一些 HyperLiquid 持有者已经开始尽量减少担忧，因为 FUD 旨在出售安全服务，甚至质疑发出警告的时机，而这恰逢 HYPE 在一个月内首次大幅下跌。

Currently trading at around $28, HYPE had climbed since launch to an all-time high of $35 two days ago, according to data from CoinMarketCap.

根据 CoinMarketCap 的数据，HYPE 目前的交易价格约为 28 美元，自两天前推出以来已攀升至 35 美元的历史新高。