北韓駭客在 DeFi 協議 HyperLiquid 上清算了 50 萬美元，但有些人認為這是一個“令人擔憂的跡象”

雖然有些人會很高興看到拉撒路集團的一些不義之財付諸東流，但其他人則認為這項活動是一個潛在的令人擔憂的跡象。

North Korean hackers were liquidated for almost $500,000 on decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol HyperLiquid over the weekend, according to a post by MetaMask’s Taylor Monahan on X.

據 MetaMask 的 Taylor Monahan 在 X 上發布的帖子稱，北韓駭客週末在去中心化金融 (DeFi) 協議 HyperLiquid 上被清算，損失近 50 萬美元。

Monahan, who tracks Lazarus Group-linked addresses across the cryptosphere, flagged the activity on HyperLiquid, noting that “DPRK doesn’t trade. DPRK tests.”

莫納漢在整個加密領域追蹤拉撒路集團相關地址，他在 HyperLiquid 上標記了這項活動，並指出「北韓不進行交易。朝鮮進行測試。

The Lazarus Group, also known as the Bureau 121, is a North Korean state-sponsored advanced persistent threat (APT) group. The group is known for its involvement in several high-profile cyberattacks, including the 2014 Sony Pictures hack and the 2017 WannaCry ransomware attack.

Lazarus 組織，也稱為 121 局，是北韓國家支持的高級持續威脅 (APT) 組織。該組織因參與數起備受矚目的網路攻擊而聞名，包括 2014 年索尼影業駭客攻擊和 2017 年 WannaCry 勒索軟體攻擊。

HyperLiquid is a decentralized exchange (DEX) that runs on its own network, built on top of Arbitrum, an L2 that itself settles to Ethereum mainnet.

HyperLiquid 是一個去中心化交易所 (DEX)，在自己的網路上運行，建立在 Arbitrum 之上，Arbitrum 是一個本身定居在以太坊主網的 L2。

In order to provide the low latency needed for the CEX-like speed of the exchange, the network relies on just four validators.

為了提供類似 CEX 的交易速度所需的低延遲，此網路僅依賴四個驗證器。

According to DeFi developer Cygaar, compromising three of these four would allow infiltrators to extract the 2.3 billion USDC backing the network.

根據 DeFi 開發者 Cygaar 的說法，入侵者可以盜取這 4 項中的 3 項，從而提取支援網路的 23 億美元 USDC。

Such an event would be far from the first time the Lazarus Group has managed to pull off something like this,

這樣的事件遠非 Lazarus Group 第一次成功完成這樣的事情，

In 2022, the majority of the Ronin Bridge’s validator set was compromised, leading to over $600 million lost, and in October, Radiant Capital lost $50 million when a threshold of three of 11 multisig signers were duped into signing a malicious transaction.

2022 年，Ronin Bridge 的大部分驗證器集遭到破壞，導致超過6 億美元的損失；10 月，當11 個多重簽署者中的3 個被欺騙簽署惡意交易時，Radiant Capital 損失了5000 萬美元。

At the time, concerns were raised over the sheer amount of value secured by often-times relatively few signatures, such as Blast’s three of five multisig securing $1.45 billion.

當時，人們對通常相對較少的簽名所獲得的巨大價值表示擔憂，例如 Blast 的五個多重簽名中的三個獲得了 14.5 億美元。

Some have urged calm, noting that bridging such a large chunk of funds would give time to interrupt the process, and that the primary backing asset, USDC, can be frozen by its issuer, Circle. “Rolling-back” the Arbitrum network in the event of an emergency was even floated as a last resort.

有些人敦促大家保持冷靜，他們指出，橋接如此大筆資金將需要時間來中斷這一過程，而且主要支持資產 USDC 可能會被其發行人 Circle 凍結。在緊急情況下「回滾」Arbitrum 網路甚至被認為是最後的手段。

However, others remain skeptical about both Circle’s response time, and Arbitrum’s willingness to roll-back “for anything less than an absolutely self-existential threat.”

然而，其他人仍然對 Circle 的回應時間和 Arbitrum 是否願意「因為任何非絕對自我存在的威脅」而回滾表示懷疑。

A Dune dashboard monitoring USDC on Hyperliquid (by user hashed_official) shows current daily outflows of over 96 million USDC, though $2.24 billion remains in the bridge.

在 Hyperliquid 上監控 USDC 的 Dune 儀表板（由用戶 hashed_official）顯示，目前每日流出的 USDC 超過 9,600 萬美元，但仍有 22.4 億美元留在橋中。

Since the generous launch of the HYPE token, HyperLiquid has been hailed as the darling of a resurgent DeFi sector.

自 HYPE 代幣慷慨推出以來，HyperLiquid 被譽為復興的 DeFi 領域的寵兒。

In response to Monahan’s post, some HyperLiquid holders have taken to minimizing the concerns as FUD designed to sell security services, or even questioning the timing of the warning, which coincides with HYPE’s first major dip in a month of up-only.

為了回應 Monahan 的帖子，一些 HyperLiquid 持有者已經開始盡量減少擔憂，因為 FUD 旨在出售安全服務，甚至質疑發出警告的時機，而這恰逢 HYPE 在一個月內首次大幅下跌。

Currently trading at around $28, HYPE had climbed since launch to an all-time high of $35 two days ago, according to data from CoinMarketCap.

根據 CoinMarketCap 的數據，HYPE 目前的交易價格約為 28 美元，自兩天前推出以來已攀升至 35 美元的歷史新高。