|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
中本聪侦查的历史充满了错误的转折、死胡同和徒劳的追逐。但周二晚上在美国播出的 HBO 的《金钱电力:比特币之谜》本应有所不同。
HBO's "MONEY ELECTRIC: THE BITCOIN MYSTERY" aired in the United States Tuesday night, promising to reveal the true identity of Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin. However, leaks emerged earlier in the day suggesting that the doc would identify Peter Todd as Satoshi, a claim that left many skeptical.
HBO 的《金钱电力:比特币之谜》周二晚在美国播出,承诺揭露比特币化名创造者中本聪的真实身份。然而,当天早些时候出现的泄密事件表明,该医生将彼得托德识别为中本聪,这一说法引起了许多人的怀疑。
After watching the documentary, skepticism turned into incredulity. Here is a smattering of tweets, reflecting the consensus.
看完纪录片后,怀疑变成了怀疑。以下是一些推文,反映了共识。
Bitcoin author Eric Yakes had it right:
比特币作者 Eric Yakes 说得对:
Coin Center's Neeraj Agrawal:
硬币中心的 Neeraj Agrawal:
"Faketoshi" Craig Wright, who has claimed to be Satoshi for years, also said the doc was wrong. For once, said Todd, we could agree with him:
多年来一直自称中本聪的“Faketoshi”克雷格·赖特也表示,这位医生是错误的。托德说,这一次我们可以同意他的观点:
@MevenRekt pointed out many inaccuracies in an otherwise well made piece of TV:
@MevenRekt 指出了一部制作精良的电视剧中的许多不准确之处:
Nic Carter had sympathy for bitcoin outsiders:
尼克卡特对比特币局外人表示同情:
@Pledditor said the doc showed how Satoshi sleuths have been going about it the wrong way, thinking they were looking for a single well-placed person, when it really could have been many people:
@Pledditor 说,该文档展示了中本聪侦探们如何以错误的方式进行调查,认为他们正在寻找一个合适的人,而实际上可能有很多人:
"This documentary is emblematic of why all of the Satoshi Nakamoto theories are bunk. They all hinge on the belief that only a very small amount of people in the world are capable of building bitcoin, so the theorists just pick a notable person known for their achievements and work backwards retrospectively to find a bunch of "coincidences" in their lifestyle/background to support their confirmation bias. It's a broken methodology which results in stalking and unethical doxxing. In reality, the potential amount of people with the profile and background capable of creating bitcoin in 2008 was in the tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands. The likelihood that Satoshi was any one of these semi-public figures that regularly get accused of being Satoshi is pretty slim. That's why if you don't have concrete proof, you should probably keep your Satoshi Nakamoto identity theories to yourself. All it does is put a $60 billion dollar bounty on the back of what is (most likely) the wrong person."
“这部纪录片象征着为什么中本聪的所有理论都是废话。它们都基于这样的信念:世界上只有极少数人有能力构建比特币,因此理论家们只是选择了一位以其技术而闻名的名人。这是一种不完善的方法,会导致跟踪和不道德的人肉搜索。实际上,具有这种能力的人的数量可能很大。 2008 年创造比特币的人数即使不是数十万,也有数万。如果你不知道,中本聪是这些经常被指责为中本聪的半公众人物之一的可能性相当小。具体的证据是,你可能应该对中本聪的身份理论保密,它所做的只是向(最有可能)错误的人提供 600 亿美元的赏金。”
Fortune's Leo Schwartz:
《财富》杂志的里奥·施瓦茨:
Journalist Izabella Kaminska said we shouldn't be so quick to dismiss the doc's conclusions. After all: body language.
记者伊莎贝拉·卡明斯卡 (Izabella Kaminska) 表示,我们不应该这么快就驳回医生的结论。毕竟:肢体语言。
@bitstein said Satoshi is pseudonymous and always will be:
@bitstein 说中本聪是化名,并且永远都是:
Todd himself had the final word:
托德本人说了算:
免责声明:info@kdj.com
所提供的信息并非交易建议。根据本文提供的信息进行的任何投资,kdj.com不承担任何责任。加密货币具有高波动性,强烈建议您深入研究后,谨慎投资!
如您认为本网站上使用的内容侵犯了您的版权,请立即联系我们(info@kdj.com),我们将及时删除。
-
- DePIN:比 NFT 甚至 Web3 更有意义的新加密叙事
- 2024-10-10 06:20:02
- DePIN 代表去中心化物理基础设施网络,代表任何实际使用的加密货币。
-
- #SHIB:可以让你一夜之间成为百万富翁的数字货币
- 2024-10-10 06:20:02
-
- Aave (AAVE) 提供了利用近期下跌的机会
- 2024-10-10 06:20:02
- Aave [AAVE] 已成为加密货币领域的杰出协议之一,特别是因为它专注于去中心化借贷。