|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
中本聰偵查的歷史充滿了錯誤的轉折、死胡同和徒勞的追逐。但周二晚上在美國播出的 HBO 的《金錢電力:比特幣之謎》本應有所不同。
HBO's "MONEY ELECTRIC: THE BITCOIN MYSTERY" aired in the United States Tuesday night, promising to reveal the true identity of Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin. However, leaks emerged earlier in the day suggesting that the doc would identify Peter Todd as Satoshi, a claim that left many skeptical.
HBO 的《金錢電力:比特幣之謎》週二晚間在美國播出,承諾揭露比特幣化名創造者中本聰的真實身份。然而,當天早些時候出現的洩密事件表明,該醫生將彼得托德識別為中本聰,這一說法引起了許多人的懷疑。
After watching the documentary, skepticism turned into incredulity. Here is a smattering of tweets, reflecting the consensus.
看完紀錄片後,懷疑變成了懷疑。以下是一些推文,反映了共識。
Bitcoin author Eric Yakes had it right:
比特幣作者 Eric Yakes 說得對:
Coin Center's Neeraj Agrawal:
硬幣中心的 Neeraj Agrawal:
"Faketoshi" Craig Wright, who has claimed to be Satoshi for years, also said the doc was wrong. For once, said Todd, we could agree with him:
多年來一直自稱中本聰的「Faketoshi」克雷格·賴特也表示,這位醫生是錯的。托德說,這次我們可以同意他的觀點:
@MevenRekt pointed out many inaccuracies in an otherwise well made piece of TV:
@MevenRekt 指出了一部製作精良的電視劇中的許多不準確之處:
Nic Carter had sympathy for bitcoin outsiders:
尼克卡特對比特幣局外人表示同情:
@Pledditor said the doc showed how Satoshi sleuths have been going about it the wrong way, thinking they were looking for a single well-placed person, when it really could have been many people:
@Pledditor 說,該文件展示了中本聰偵探如何以錯誤的方式進行調查,認為他們正在尋找一個合適的人,而實際上可能有很多人:
"This documentary is emblematic of why all of the Satoshi Nakamoto theories are bunk. They all hinge on the belief that only a very small amount of people in the world are capable of building bitcoin, so the theorists just pick a notable person known for their achievements and work backwards retrospectively to find a bunch of "coincidences" in their lifestyle/background to support their confirmation bias. It's a broken methodology which results in stalking and unethical doxxing. In reality, the potential amount of people with the profile and background capable of creating bitcoin in 2008 was in the tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands. The likelihood that Satoshi was any one of these semi-public figures that regularly get accused of being Satoshi is pretty slim. That's why if you don't have concrete proof, you should probably keep your Satoshi Nakamoto identity theories to yourself. All it does is put a $60 billion dollar bounty on the back of what is (most likely) the wrong person."
「這部紀錄片象徵著為什麼中本聰的所有理論都是廢話。它們都基於這樣的信念:世界上只有極少數人有能力構建比特幣,因此理論家們只是選擇了一位以其技術而聞名的名人。也有數萬。它所做的只是向(最有可能)錯誤的人提供600 億美元的賞金。
Fortune's Leo Schwartz:
《財星》雜誌的里奧‧施瓦茨:
Journalist Izabella Kaminska said we shouldn't be so quick to dismiss the doc's conclusions. After all: body language.
記者伊莎貝拉·卡明斯卡 (Izabella Kaminska) 表示,我們不應該這麼快就駁回醫生的結論。畢竟:肢體語言。
@bitstein said Satoshi is pseudonymous and always will be:
@bitstein 說中本聰是化名,而且永遠都是:
Todd himself had the final word:
托德自己說了算:
免責聲明:info@kdj.com
所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!
如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。
-
- DePIN:比 NFT 甚至 Web3 更有意義的新加密敘事
- 2024-10-10 06:20:02
- DePIN 代表去中心化實體基礎設施網絡,代表任何實際使用的加密貨幣。
-
- #SHIB:可以讓你一夕之間成為百萬富翁的數位貨幣
- 2024-10-10 06:20:02
-
- Aave (AAVE) 提供了利用近期下跌的機會
- 2024-10-10 06:20:02
- Aave [AAVE] 已成為加密貨幣領域的傑出協議之一,特別是因為它專注於去中心化借貸。