福布斯严厉的“加密货币僵尸”文章引发轩然大波，促使行业领袖进行辩护

福布斯对 Cardano 和 Stellar 等 20 多个未充分利用的区块链网络的批评引发了行业争论。卡尔达诺创始人查尔斯·霍斯金森拒绝了“加密货币僵尸”的标签，将这些项目的成功归因于他们的智慧。

Forbes' Scathing 'Crypto Zombies' Article Ignites Uproar, Sparks Defense from Industry Leaders

福布斯严厉的“加密货币僵尸”文章引发轩然大波，引发行业领袖的辩护

A recent Forbes article has sparked a storm of controversy within the cryptocurrency sector, painting a grim picture of over two dozen blockchain networks as "crypto zombies" lacking significant usage, development, and real-world applications. The article's scathing analysis has drawn sharp criticism from several industry leaders, who have rallied to defend their respective projects against the allegations.

《福布斯》最近的一篇文章在加密货币领域引发了一场争议风暴，将二十多个区块链网络描绘成缺乏大量使用、开发和实际应用的“加密僵尸”的严峻景象。这篇文章的严厉分析引起了几位行业领袖的尖锐批评，他们联合起来为各自的项目辩护，反对这些指控。

Forbes' Methodology and Targeted Projects

福布斯的方法论和目标项目

Forbes' analysis scrutinized the top 50 blockchain networks, evaluating them based on four key metrics: monthly active developers, fees generated over the past year, total value locked, and the market cap-to-fees ratio. The article concluded that over 20 crypto projects with market caps exceeding $1 billion are sustained solely by speculation, offering minimal value or utility.

福布斯的分析仔细审查了前 50 个区块链网络，根据四个关键指标对其进行评估：每月活跃开发者、过去一年产生的费用、锁定的总价值以及市值与费用比率。文章的结论是，超过 20 个市值超过 10 亿美元的加密货币项目仅靠投机维持，提供的价值或效用极小。

Among the projects targeted by Forbes were some of the most prominent names in the industry, including XRP, Cardano, Stellar, Stacks, Bitcoin Cash, Litecoin, Fantom, Algorand, Tezos, and EOS. Collectively, these projects command a market capitalization of approximately $59.3 billion.

福布斯瞄准的项目包括一些业内最著名的项目，包括 XRP、Cardano、Stellar、Stacks、Bitcoin Cash、Litecoin、Fantom、Algorand、Tezos 和 EOS。这些项目的总市值约为 593 亿美元。

Industry Leaders Counter Attack

行业龙头逆袭

The allegations leveled by Forbes have been met with swift and vehement rebuttals from leaders within the respective communities of the targeted projects. Charles Hoskinson, the founder of Cardano, took to Twitter to dismiss the "zombie" comparison, playfully suggesting that the projects included in the article possess superior intelligence.

福布斯提出的指控遭到了目标项目各自社区领导人的迅速而激烈的反驳。卡尔达诺创始人查尔斯·霍斯金森 (Charles Hoskinson) 在推特上驳斥了“僵尸”的比较，并开玩笑地暗示文章中包含的项目拥有卓越的智能。

Hoskinson's sentiment was echoed by proponents of XRP, who derided the article's author and the outlet. Panos Mekras, founder of XRPL-based Anodos Finance, denounced the piece as "nonsense and misinformation," questioning the author's research and understanding of the industry.

霍斯金森的观点得到了 XRP 支持者的响应，他们嘲笑了文章的作者和媒体。基于 XRPL 的 Anodos Finance 创始人 Panos Mekras 谴责这篇文章是“无稽之谈和错误信息”，质疑作者对该行业的研究和理解。

Pro-XRP crypto lawyer Bill Morgan raised concerns over the SEC's pursuit of Ripple if XRPL were indeed a dormant "zombie chain." Emir Yavuz, who handles community engagement at Ultra Stellar, defended Stellar, emphasizing the project's recent strides in tokenization, including WisdomTree's $365 million in tokenized assets.

如果 XRPL 确实是一条休眠的“僵尸链”，支持 XRP 的加密货币律师 Bill Morgan 对 SEC 追捕 Ripple 表示担忧。 Ultra Stellar 负责社区参与的 Emir Yavuz 为 Stellar 进行了辩护，强调了该项目最近在代币化方面取得的进步，包括 WisdomTree 的 3.65 亿美元代币化资产。

Partial Concurrence from Crypto Insiders

加密货币内部人士的部分同意

While some within the cryptocurrency community have vehemently rejected Forbes' findings, others have acknowledged the validity of certain observations. Renowned independent journalist Laura Shin praised the article for shedding light on the issue of "crypto zombies," describing it as an "excellent story."

虽然加密货币社区中的一些人强烈拒绝福布斯的调查结果，但其他人承认某些观察结果的有效性。著名独立记者 Laura Shin 称赞这篇文章揭示了“加密僵尸”问题，称其为“精彩的故事”。

Forbes' Critical Metrics

福布斯的关键指标

Forbes' analysis heavily relied on the following metrics to assess the viability of the targeted blockchain networks:

福布斯的分析在很大程度上依赖于以下指标来评估目标区块链网络的可行性：

• Ratio of Market Cap to Fees: This metric compares the market capitalization of a project to the fees it generates. Projects with high ratios may indicate speculative hype rather than meaningful usage.
• Fundraising and Hodling of Funds: Forbes highlighted the tendency of "crypto zombies" to raise substantial funds for future expansion, potentially resembling securities offerings that fall under the SEC's Howey test. The article further criticized the hoarding of funds by projects such as Ripple, which holds a significant treasury of XRP tokens.

Conclusion

市值与费用之比：该指标将项目的市值与其产生的费用进行比较。高比率的项目可能表明投机性炒作，而不是有意义的使用。 筹款和资金持有：《福布斯》强调了“加密货币僵尸”为未来扩张筹集大量资金的趋势，可能类似于符合 SEC 豪伊测试的证券发行。文章进一步批评了 Ripple 等项目囤积资金的行为，Ripple 持有大量 XRP 代币。 结论

Forbes' "crypto zombies" article has undoubtedly sparked a heated debate within the cryptocurrency industry. While some have vehemently refuted the allegations, others have acknowledged the need for increased focus on project viability and real-world applications. The article has also raised questions about the fundraising practices of certain blockchain networks and the potential implications under securities regulations.

福布斯的“加密僵尸”文章无疑引发了加密货币行业内的热议。尽管一些人强烈反驳这些指控，但另一些人承认需要更加关注项目的可行性和现实应用。该文章还提出了有关某些区块链网络的筹款做法以及证券监管下的潜在影响的问题。

As the cryptocurrency sector continues to evolve, the issue of "crypto zombies" is likely to remain a topic of discussion. The industry must grapple with the challenge of distinguishing between projects that offer genuine value and those that rely solely on speculation. This scrutiny will ultimately benefit the sector by fostering innovation and weeding out unsustainable projects, paving the way for a more robust and thriving ecosystem.

随着加密货币行业的不断发展，“加密货币僵尸”问题可能仍然是一个讨论的话题。该行业必须应对区分提供真正价值的项目和仅依赖投机的项目的挑战。这种审查最终将通过促进创新和淘汰不可持续的项目使该行业受益，为更加强大和繁荣的生态系统铺平道路。