哪一个更像EOS，ETH或SOL？

加密社区一直拥有许多不同项目的分支机构，从最早的比特币硬货量，LTC，Doge和其他“模仿者”分支机构。

The crypto community has always had many branches of different projects, from the earliest Bitcoin hard forks, LTC, Doge and other "copycats", and later well-known factions such as Ethereum, EOS, Solana, etc. They represent the differences and similarities in concepts and directions. There is cooperation in their respective ecosystems, but more often there are attacks between communities due to different views.

加密社区始终拥有许多不同项目的分支机构，从最早的比特币硬货，LTC，Doge和其他“模仿者”以及后来著名的派系（例如以太坊，EOS，Solana等）。它们代表了差异和相似之处在概念和方向上。他们各自的生态系统中存在合作，但是由于不同的观点，社区之间的攻击经常发生。

Since Solana performed well this round, while Ethereum performed relatively poorly, people in the Solana community said that ETH is like EOS back then, while people in the Ethereum community countered that SOL is EOS. When a project is considered to be like EOS, it means that it is considered to be facing a pessimistic prospect or entering a "bottomless abyss". So, which one is more like EOS, ETH or SOL? Today we will take a look from multiple angles...

由于Solana在本轮比赛中表现良好，而以太坊的表现相对较差，Solana社区的人们说，ETH就像当时的EOS一样，而以太坊社区的人们反驳说Sol是EOS。当一个项目被认为像EOS时，这意味着它被认为面临悲观的前景或进入“无底深渊”。那么，哪一个更像EOS，ETH或SOL？今天，我们将从多个角度看一下...

01. Technical route and design concept

01。技术路线和设计概念

As the underlying public chains, the most important goal of the technical solutions of Ethereum, Solana and EOS in the past is to break the "impossible triangle" of blockchain and become a safe, reliable, high-performance and highly scalable infrastructure.

作为基本的公共连锁店，过去以太坊，索拉纳和EOS技术解决方案的最重要目标是打破区块链的“不可能的三角形”，并成为安全，可靠，高性能和高度可扩展的基础架构。

In terms of capacity expansion plans, Ethereum chose to transition from the POW consensus mechanism to a special POS consensus mechanism and plans to increase network throughput through sharding in the future. It will later tentatively switch to a capacity expansion plan centered on the Rollup Layer2 layering, and has made some progress.

在能力扩展计划方面，以太坊选择从POW共识机制过渡到特殊的POS共识机制，并计划将来通过碎片增加网络吞吐量。稍后，它将暂时切换到以汇总2层上为中心的容量扩展计划，并取得了一些进展。

Compared with Ethereum, Solana uses "Proof of History" more radically to achieve faster transaction confirmation. This consensus mechanism achieves high performance and can handle a large number of transactions. Similarly, EOS was also a high-performance blockchain at the time, achieving extremely high throughput through the DPoS (delegated proof of stake) consensus mechanism.

与以太坊相比，Solana更加彻底地使用“历史证明”来实现更快的交易确认。这种共识机制可实现高性能，可以处理大量交易。同样，EOS当时也是高性能区块链，通过DPO（授权的股份证明）共识机制实现了极高的吞吐量。

In terms of technology, Solana and EOS are more similar, both of which sacrifice some decentralization while aggressively pursuing extreme performance, exposing some node concentration problems. However, the difference is that although Solana has experienced several unstable downtime experiences, it is gradually optimizing and upgrading. Ethereum's solution is considered more conservative, and in order not to sacrifice decentralization, it has chosen a difficult and complex path.

在技​​术方面，Solana和EOS更加相似，两者都牺牲了一些权力下放，同时积极追求极端性能，暴露了一些节点浓度问题。但是，不同之处在于，尽管Solana经历了几种不稳定的停机体验，但它逐渐优化和升级。以太坊的解决方案被认为是更保守的，为了不牺牲权力下放，它选择了一条困难而复杂的道路。

02. Sustainability

02。可持续性

“A journey of a thousand miles tests a horse’s strength, and time reveals a person’s heart.” In the ever-changing crypto space, “survival” may be the most valuable quality of a project. Many times, innovation also means taking an unconventional path and facing more risks and challenges.

“一千英里的旅程测试了一匹马的力量，时间揭示了一个人的心。”在不断变化的加密空间中，“生存”可能是项目中最有价值的品质。很多时候，创新也意味着采取非常规的道路，面临更多的风险和挑战。

From a historical perspective, Ethereum has withstood the challenge and test of "time" and is second only to the cryptocurrency leader "Bitcoin". Ethereum currently still maintains the largest development community and active ecology, and has a moat with real-world applications of concepts such as DeFi. Continuous innovation and ecological construction have enabled it to firmly sit in the "second" position in cryptocurrency assets.

从历史的角度来看，以太坊经受了对“时间”的挑战和考验，仅次于加密货币领导者“比特币”。以太坊目前仍保持最大的开发社区和活跃的生态学，并具有带有诸如defi之类的概念的现实应用。持续的创新和生态构建使其能够牢固地位于加密货币资产中的“第二”位置。

EOS does not seem to have stood the test of time. EOS and its ecosystem enjoyed a period of glory, but then exposed some sustainability deficiencies and eventually became unable to recover. It remains to be seen whether it can "make a comeback" in the future.

EO似乎没有经过时间的考验。 EOS及其生态系统享有一段时期的荣耀，但随后暴露了一些可持续性缺陷，并最终无法恢复。将来是否可以“卷土重来”还有待观察。

Solana, which has a shorter history than EOS, has also experienced the adverse effects of the collapse of its main supporters SBF and FTX, as well as frequent downtime and attacks. It can be said that it has experienced a lot, but it has also exposed some stability and security issues, and its sustainability is facing challenges.

索拉纳（Solana）的历史比EOS较短，还经历了其主要支持者SBF和FTX崩溃的不利影响，以及频繁的停机时间和攻击。可以说，它经历了很多经历，但也暴露了一些稳定和安全问题，其可持续性正面临着挑战。

Perhaps based on EOS’s relatively “failed” experience, the Ethereum and Solana communities will carefully consider the issue of sustainability.

也许基于EOS相对“失败”的经验，以太坊和索拉纳社区将仔细考虑可持续性问题。

03. Community and institutional support

03。社区和机构支持

The development of crypto projects is inseparable from the continuous support of the community, and of course there is also the shadow of institutional capital behind it. The prosperity of the ecosystem is inseparable from the community, and the capital brought by institutions accelerates its progress.

加密项目的发展与社区的持续支持是不可分割的，当然，它背后也有机构资本的阴影。生态系统的繁荣与社区密不可分，机构带来的资本加速了其进步。

EOS actually had a broad community consensus in the early stage of its launch, and also received a lot of capital and institutional support. Its development company Block.one also invested a lot of money and human resources. However, perhaps due to the pressure brought by the US SEC supervision, Block.one, as the project party, could not directly participate in the launch of the main network and the operation of the project. After settling the lawsuit with the US SEC, it chose to lie low with the huge wealth in its hands, which was equivalent to leaving the project to the community.

EOS实际上在推出的早期阶段就达成了广泛的社区共识，并且还获得了大量资本和机构支持。它的开发公司Block。一个人还投入了大量资金和人力资源。但是，也许是由于美国SEC监督所带来的压力，Block.One作为项目党，无法直接参与主要网络的启动和项目的运营。在与美国SEC解决了诉讼之后，它选择了巨大的财富手中的低位，这相当于将项目留给社区。

Due to the impact of governance models and centralization issues, EOS community consensus has gradually weakened, super nodes and developers have gradually lost confidence, and this is the result we see.

由于治理模型和集中化问题的影响，EOS社区共识逐渐削弱了，超级节点和开发人员逐渐失去了信心，这就是我们看到的结果。

Compared with EOS, Solana has received relatively more support from Wall Street elites and capital. The good trend seems to have gathered a strong community consensus in the short term. The leadership of its project team is also extremely active in the community. Coupled with the loose state of US crypto regulation after Trump took office, the Solana team will not have similar pressure. On the contrary, due to the popularity of concepts such

与EOS相比，Solana获得了华尔街精英和资本的更多支持。在短期内，好趋势似乎已经达成了强大的社区共识。其项目团队的领导在社区中也非常活跃。加上特朗普上任后，美国加密货币法规的宽松状态，索拉纳队不会承受类似的压力。相反，由于概念的流行