哪一個更像EOS，ETH或SOL？

加密社區一直擁有許多不同項目的分支機構，從最早的比特幣硬貨量，LTC，Doge和其他“模仿者”分支機構。

The crypto community has always had many branches of different projects, from the earliest Bitcoin hard forks, LTC, Doge and other "copycats", and later well-known factions such as Ethereum, EOS, Solana, etc. They represent the differences and similarities in concepts and directions. There is cooperation in their respective ecosystems, but more often there are attacks between communities due to different views.

加密社區始終擁有許多不同項目的分支機構，從最早的比特幣硬貨，LTC，Doge和其他“模仿者”以及後來著名的派系（例如以太坊，EOS，Solana等）。它們代表了差異和相似之處在概念和方向上。他們各自的生態系統中存在合作，但是由於不同的觀點，社區之間的攻擊經常發生。

Since Solana performed well this round, while Ethereum performed relatively poorly, people in the Solana community said that ETH is like EOS back then, while people in the Ethereum community countered that SOL is EOS. When a project is considered to be like EOS, it means that it is considered to be facing a pessimistic prospect or entering a "bottomless abyss". So, which one is more like EOS, ETH or SOL? Today we will take a look from multiple angles...

由於Solana在本輪比賽中表現良好，而以太坊的表現相對較差，Solana社區的人們說，ETH就像當時的EOS一樣，而以太坊社區的人們反駁說Sol是EOS。當一個項目被認為像EOS時，這意味著它被認為面臨悲觀的前景或進入“無底深淵”。那麼，哪一個更像EOS，ETH或SOL？今天，我們將從多個角度看一下...

01. Technical route and design concept

01。技術路線和設計概念

As the underlying public chains, the most important goal of the technical solutions of Ethereum, Solana and EOS in the past is to break the "impossible triangle" of blockchain and become a safe, reliable, high-performance and highly scalable infrastructure.

作為基本的公共連鎖店，過去以太坊，索拉納和EOS技術解決方案的最重要目標是打破區塊鏈的“不可能的三角形”，並成為安全，可靠，高性能和高度可擴展的基礎架構。

In terms of capacity expansion plans, Ethereum chose to transition from the POW consensus mechanism to a special POS consensus mechanism and plans to increase network throughput through sharding in the future. It will later tentatively switch to a capacity expansion plan centered on the Rollup Layer2 layering, and has made some progress.

在能力擴展計劃方面，以太坊選擇從POW共識機製過渡到特殊的POS共識機制，併計劃將來通過碎片增加網絡吞吐量。稍後，它將暫時切換到以匯總2層上為中心的容量擴展計劃，並取得了一些進展。

Compared with Ethereum, Solana uses "Proof of History" more radically to achieve faster transaction confirmation. This consensus mechanism achieves high performance and can handle a large number of transactions. Similarly, EOS was also a high-performance blockchain at the time, achieving extremely high throughput through the DPoS (delegated proof of stake) consensus mechanism.

與以太坊相比，Solana更加徹底地使用“歷史證明”來實現更快的交易確認。這種共識機制可實現高性能，可以處理大量交易。同樣，EOS當時也是高性能區塊鏈，通過DPO（授權的股份證明）共識機制實現了極高的吞吐量。

In terms of technology, Solana and EOS are more similar, both of which sacrifice some decentralization while aggressively pursuing extreme performance, exposing some node concentration problems. However, the difference is that although Solana has experienced several unstable downtime experiences, it is gradually optimizing and upgrading. Ethereum's solution is considered more conservative, and in order not to sacrifice decentralization, it has chosen a difficult and complex path.

在技​​術方面，Solana和EOS更加相似，兩者都犧牲了一些權力下放，同時積極追求極端性能，暴露了一些節點濃度問題。但是，不同之處在於，儘管Solana經歷了幾種不穩定的停機體驗，但它逐漸優化和升級。以太坊的解決方案被認為是更保守的，為了不犧牲權力下放，它選擇了一條困難而復雜的道路。

02. Sustainability

02。可持續性

“A journey of a thousand miles tests a horse’s strength, and time reveals a person’s heart.” In the ever-changing crypto space, “survival” may be the most valuable quality of a project. Many times, innovation also means taking an unconventional path and facing more risks and challenges.

“一千英里的旅程測試了一匹馬的力量，時間揭示了一個人的心。”在不斷變化的加密空間中，“生存”可能是項目中最有價值的品質。很多時候，創新也意味著採取非常規的道路，面臨更多的風險和挑戰。

From a historical perspective, Ethereum has withstood the challenge and test of "time" and is second only to the cryptocurrency leader "Bitcoin". Ethereum currently still maintains the largest development community and active ecology, and has a moat with real-world applications of concepts such as DeFi. Continuous innovation and ecological construction have enabled it to firmly sit in the "second" position in cryptocurrency assets.

從歷史的角度來看，以太坊經受了對“時間”的挑戰和考驗，僅次於加密貨幣領導者“比特幣”。以太坊目前仍保持最大的開發社區和活躍的生態學，並具有帶有諸如defi之類的概念的現實應用。持續的創新和生態構建使其能夠牢固地位於加密貨幣資產中的“第二”位置。

EOS does not seem to have stood the test of time. EOS and its ecosystem enjoyed a period of glory, but then exposed some sustainability deficiencies and eventually became unable to recover. It remains to be seen whether it can "make a comeback" in the future.

EO似乎沒有經過時間的考驗。 EOS及其生態系統享有一段時期的榮耀，但隨後暴露了一些可持續性缺陷，並最終無法恢復。將來是否可以“捲土重來”還有待觀察。

Solana, which has a shorter history than EOS, has also experienced the adverse effects of the collapse of its main supporters SBF and FTX, as well as frequent downtime and attacks. It can be said that it has experienced a lot, but it has also exposed some stability and security issues, and its sustainability is facing challenges.

索拉納（Solana）的歷史比EOS較短，還經歷了其主要支持者SBF和FTX崩潰的不利影響，以及頻繁的停機時間和攻擊。可以說，它經歷了很多經歷，但也暴露了一些穩定和安全問題，其可持續性正面臨著挑戰。

Perhaps based on EOS’s relatively “failed” experience, the Ethereum and Solana communities will carefully consider the issue of sustainability.

也許基於EOS相對“失敗”的經驗，以太坊和索拉納社區將仔細考慮可持續性問題。

03. Community and institutional support

03。社區和機構支持

The development of crypto projects is inseparable from the continuous support of the community, and of course there is also the shadow of institutional capital behind it. The prosperity of the ecosystem is inseparable from the community, and the capital brought by institutions accelerates its progress.

加密項目的發展與社區的持續支持是不可分割的，當然，它背後也有機構資本的陰影。生態系統的繁榮與社區密不可分，機構帶來的資本加速了其進步。

EOS actually had a broad community consensus in the early stage of its launch, and also received a lot of capital and institutional support. Its development company Block.one also invested a lot of money and human resources. However, perhaps due to the pressure brought by the US SEC supervision, Block.one, as the project party, could not directly participate in the launch of the main network and the operation of the project. After settling the lawsuit with the US SEC, it chose to lie low with the huge wealth in its hands, which was equivalent to leaving the project to the community.

EOS實際上在推出的早期階段就達成了廣泛的社區共識，並且還獲得了大量資本和機構支持。它的開發公司Block。一個人還投入了大量資金和人力資源。但是，也許是由於美國SEC監督所帶來的壓力，Block.One作為項目黨，無法直接參與主要網絡的啟動和項目的運營。在與美國SEC解決了訴訟之後，它選擇了巨大的財富手中的低位，這相當於將項目留給社區。

Due to the impact of governance models and centralization issues, EOS community consensus has gradually weakened, super nodes and developers have gradually lost confidence, and this is the result we see.

由於治理模型和集中化問題的影響，EOS社區共識逐漸削弱了，超級節點和開發人員逐漸失去了信心，這就是我們看到的結果。

Compared with EOS, Solana has received relatively more support from Wall Street elites and capital. The good trend seems to have gathered a strong community consensus in the short term. The leadership of its project team is also extremely active in the community. Coupled with the loose state of US crypto regulation after Trump took office, the Solana team will not have similar pressure. On the contrary, due to the popularity of concepts such

與EOS相比，Solana獲得了華爾街精英和資本的更多支持。在短期內，好趨勢似乎已經達成了強大的社區共識。其項目團隊的領導在社區中也非常活躍。加上特朗普上任後，美國加密貨幣法規的寬鬆狀態，索拉納隊不會承受類似的壓力。相反，由於概念的流行