bitcoin
bitcoin

$94378.24 USD 

3.01%

ethereum
ethereum

$3151.26 USD 

1.82%

tether
tether

$1.00 USD 

0.05%

solana
solana

$241.67 USD 

0.83%

bnb
bnb

$619.87 USD 

0.83%

xrp
xrp

$1.14 USD 

5.58%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.394938 USD 

1.29%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999726 USD 

-0.02%

cardano
cardano

$0.836585 USD 

14.77%

tron
tron

$0.199177 USD 

-1.31%

shiba-inu
shiba-inu

$0.000025 USD 

-1.39%

avalanche
avalanche

$35.46 USD 

4.24%

toncoin
toncoin

$5.45 USD 

-1.24%

sui
sui

$3.73 USD 

2.75%

chainlink
chainlink

$15.27 USD 

3.82%

加密货币新闻

ELIZA:引发双重令牌混乱的人工智能代理框架

2024/11/20 19:06

在另一个团队推出 Pump.fun 后,最近流行的 AI16Z 基金最终获得了两个 ELIZA 代币。该基金旨在将 ELIZA 转变为其代理人工智能交易员之一

ELIZA:引发双重令牌混乱的人工智能代理框架

AI16Z ended up with two ELIZA tokens, after another team went for a Pump.fun launch. The fund aimed to turn ELIZA into one of its agentic AI traders, tying its performance to another token.

在另一个团队推出 Pump.fun 后,AI16Z 最终获得了两个 ELIZA 代币。该基金旨在将 ELIZA 转变为其代理人工智能交易员之一,将其业绩与另一种代币挂钩。

The AI16Z AI agent fund, mimicking the legitimate crypto fund a16Z, ended up with another case of token confusion. Initially, AI16Z aimed to create several trading profiles, and a new agent with a token attached, ELIZA. However, launching a token is an extremely fast event – and another team front ran AI16Z through Pump.fun.

AI16Z人工智能代理基金模仿合法加密货币基金a16Z,最终又出现了代币混乱的情况。最初,AI16Z 的目标是创建多个交易配置文件,以及一个附加代币 ELIZA 的新代理。然而,启动代币是一个非常快的事件——另一个团队通过 Pump.fun 运行 AI16Z。

Jupiter DEX decided to verify both tokens – the one launched by the AI agent, and the one belonging to the alternative team.

Jupiter DEX 决定验证两种代币——一种是由 AI 代理发起的,另一种是属于替代团队的。

Over the last 24 hours, there are now 2 Eliza tokens with significant marketcaps and volume, similar to the Neiro situation.

在过去 24 小时内,现在有 2 个 Eliza 代币具有可观的市值和交易量,与 Neiro 的情况类似。

In that case, we verified both in order to avoid taking sides – what would be a good situation here? pic.twitter.com/8IFXbGivvx

在这种情况下,我们对两者进行了验证,以避免偏袒任何一方——这里什么情况是好的? pic.twitter.com/8IFXbGivvx

— meow (@weremeow) November 20, 2024

- 喵 (@weremeow) 2024 年 11 月 20 日

Currently, Solscan tags the tokens as AI16ZEliza with 15,474 holders, and Eliza (ELIZA) with 12,956 holders as of November 20. The two tokens have not decided a clear winner, though they are starting to show price disparity. The AI16Z version trades at $0.028, while the community-generated ELIZA is at $0.035.

目前,截至 11 月 20 日,Solscan 将代币标记为 AI16ZEliza,拥有 15,474 名持有者,而 Eliza (ELIZA) 则拥有 12,956 名持有者。这两种代币尚未确定明显的赢家,尽管它们开始显示出价格差异。 AI16Z 版本的交易价格为 0.028 美元,而社区生成的 ELIZA 的交易价格为 0.035 美元。

The two tokens also show the formation of whale wallet clusters, with some wallets holding upward of 10% of the supply. At this stage, the tokens remain risky, with high trading volumes yet relatively low liquidity.

这两种代币还显示了鲸鱼钱包集群的形成,一些钱包持有超过 10% 的供应量。现阶段,代币仍然存在风险,交易量较高,但流动性相对较低。

Both tokens depend on early-stage Raydium pairs, with a similar amount of liquidity locked. The AI16Z token version has a slight advantage in terms of trading volumes and liquidity, but the next few days will show which token would gain more traction. The situation recalls the NEIRO token, where ticker confusion led to significant losses for those that chose the wrong asset.

这两种代币都依赖于早期的 Raydium 对,锁定了相似数量的流动性。 AI16Z 代币版本在交易量和流动性方面略有优势,但未来几天将显示哪种代币将获得更多关注。这种情况让人想起 NEIRO 代币,其中股票代码混乱导致那些选择错误资产的人遭受重大损失。

Since AI16Z is a high-profile AI agent, it sparked expectations of a big exchange listing. However, the double token confusion is splitting the community and causing skepticism about the project.

由于AI16Z是一家备受瞩目的AI代理公司,因此引发了大交易所上市的预期。然而,双重代币的混乱正在分裂社区,并引发对该项目的怀疑。

The Eliza framework was one of the main developments for AI16Z, in addition to the original fund. The original team wanted to build up the Elizaverse, which is a platform to launch community-based AI agents. At a later stage, the platform was supposed to be tokenized.

除了原始基金之外,Eliza 框架是 AI16Z 的主要开发项目之一。最初的团队想要建立 Elizaverse,这是一个启动基于社区的人工智能代理的平台。在稍后阶段,该平台应该被标记化。

Despite the double token challenge, the Eliza framework is now in the second spot among trending GitHub repositories.

尽管面临双令牌挑战,Eliza 框架目前在 GitHub 存储库趋势中排名第二。

Both ELIZA and the AI16Z trend may face challenges as more AI agents proliferate. The AI agent projects have been flying under the radar for a few months, tapping available Web3 technologies to propose a new way of risk-taking and investment. At the current stage, hype may surpass utility, as traders will look for trending assets and the most liquid AI agent platforms.

随着更多 AI 代理的激增,ELIZA 和 AI16Z 趋势都可能面临挑战。 AI 代理项目已经在人们的关注下飞行了几个月,利用可用的 Web3 技术提出了一种新的风险承担和投资方式。在现阶段,炒作可能会超越实用性,因为交易者将寻找趋势资产和最具流动性的人工智能代理平台。

Eliza opens up market for user-generated AI agents

Eliza 为用户生成的人工智能代理开辟了市场

Eliza taps a new trend, where anyone can launch an AI agent and open up for liquidity from risky traders. The activity starts to resemble that of meme tokens, and some of the AI agents are tied to previous memes and communities.

Eliza 利用了一种新趋势,任何人都可以启动人工智能代理,并为高风险交易者提供流动性。该活动开始类似于模因代币的活动,并且一些人工智能代理与以前的模因和社区相关联。

The Milady NFT community has joined the AI agent trend in droves, with more platforms and agents popping up every day. Just like meme tokens, only a small part may succeed. Most of the AI models are still small and hold less than $10K. Even the top AI agent, Sydney Sweeney AI, only has a $9.3K in tributes.

Milady NFT 社区纷纷加入人工智能代理趋势,每天都有更多平台和代理涌现。就像模因代币一样,只有一小部分可能会成功。大多数人工智能模型仍然很小,价值不到 1 万美元。即使是顶级人工智能代理 Sydney Sweeney AI,也只有 9300 美元的贡品。

In comparison, the original AI agent fund, AI16Z, still retains a valuation above $211M. The agent is expected to trade until October 25, 2025, and does not guarantee returns to its backers. After the double token scandal, the fund’s native token also nuked, sliding to $0.26.

相比之下,原AI代理基金AI16Z的估值仍保持在2.11亿美元以上。该代理预计交易至 2025 年 10 月 25 日,并且不保证其支持者的回报。在双重代币丑闻之后,该基金的原生代币也遭受重创,跌至 0.26 美元。

The value locked in the fund was more than $359M at one point, crashing just days after the launch. AI agents may prove to be as risky and volatile as memes, moving on hype rather than their real trading capabilities.

该基金锁定的价值一度超过 3.59 亿美元,在推出几天后就暴跌。人工智能代理可能会被证明与迷因一样具有风险和波动性,依靠炒作而不是其真实的交易能力。

AI agents appeared just weeks after the first AI personalities on social media launched their tokens. Now, a proliferation of new assets and projects will test the real demand for AI agents. So far, the agents still have limited trading abilities, and are yet to show performance statistics. This did not prevent a gold rush and inflow of liquidity into the new projects.

在社交媒体上第一批人工智能人物推出代币几周后,人工智能代理就出现了。现在,新资产和项目的激增将考验人工智能代理的真正需求。到目前为止,代理商的交易能力仍然有限,并且尚未显示绩效统计数据。这并没有阻止淘金热和流动性流入新项目。

A Step-By-Step System To Launching Your Web3 Career and Landing High-Paying Crypto Jobs in 90 Days.

90 天内开启您的 Web3 职业生涯并获得高薪加密工作的分步系统。

新闻来源:www.cryptopolitan.com

免责声明:info@kdj.com

所提供的信息并非交易建议。根据本文提供的信息进行的任何投资,kdj.com不承担任何责任。加密货币具有高波动性,强烈建议您深入研究后,谨慎投资!

如您认为本网站上使用的内容侵犯了您的版权,请立即联系我们(info@kdj.com),我们将及时删除。

2024年11月20日 发表的其他文章