Binance终止了与Movers的做市商Web3Port的合作

昨天，加密行业中讨论最多的话题无疑是运动社区捍卫其权利的胜利。

Author: Scof, ChainCatcher

作者：SCOF，ChainCatcher

Yesterday, the most discussed topic in the crypto industry was undoubtedly the victory of the Movement community in defending its rights.

昨天，加密行业中讨论最多的话题无疑是运动社区捍卫其权利的胜利。

According to Binance's official announcement, Binance has terminated its cooperation with Movement's market maker web3port and banned it from continuing its market making activities on the platform. The market maker sold a large number of tokens the day after MOVE went online, causing market fluctuations and earning a net profit of about 38 million USDT through this behavior. In order to protect the interests of users, Binance has notified the Movement team and frozen the market maker's earnings, which are planned to be used to compensate users later.

根据Binance的官方宣布，Binance已终止与Movers Mchoys Maker Web3Port的合作，并禁止其继续在平台上进行市场制作活动。搬家上网后的第二天，做市商出售了大量令牌，从而导致市场波动，并通过这种行为获得了约3800万美元的净利润。为了保护用户的利益，Binance已通知了运动团队并冻结了做市商的收入，该收益计划用于以后用来补偿用户。

Community members lamented: "As long as the community is united, the torch can illuminate the darkness."

社区成员感叹：“只要社区团结一致，火炬就可以照亮黑暗。”

However, although this rights protection can be regarded as a phased victory, there are still many doubts behind it, and there are still many unsolved mysteries waiting to be revealed.

但是，尽管这种权利保护可以被视为分阶段的胜利，但背后仍然有许多疑问，还有许多未解决的谜团在等待揭示。

From the community controversy

来自社区争议

Recently, crypto KOL IceFrog published an article titled "Seven Questions to Movement: In the Face of Facts, Please Respond Positively to Community Concerns", which revealed many problems with Movement and attracted widespread attention.

最近，Crypto Kol Icefrog发表了一篇题为“运动的七个问题：面对事实，请对社区的关注做出积极回应”的文章，该文章揭示了许多运动问题并引起了广泛关注。

According to Rootdata, Movement is a modular framework compatible with Solidity for building and deploying infrastructure, applications, etc. based on the Move programming language in any distributed environment.

根据rootdata的说法，运动是一个模块化框架，与基于任何分布式环境中的移动编程语言建立和部署基础架构，应用程序等的坚固性兼容。

Initially, the $MOVE token airdrop distribution plan attracted a lot of attention, promising to distribute 50%-60% of the tokens to the community. However, in practice, the airdrop window was too short, the distribution ratio was far lower than expected, and the rules were complicated and opaque, which disappointed many participants.

最初，$ MOVE MOVE STOKEN AIRDROP分销计划引起了很多关注，承诺将50％-60％的令牌分配给社区。但是，实际上，空调窗口太短，分配比率远低于预期，规则很复杂且不透明，这使许多参与者感到失望。

Data shows that 98.5% of addresses received less than 100 tokens, while some addresses received as many as 490,000 tokens, which has caused the community to question the fairness of the distribution.

数据表明，98.5％的地址收到的令牌少于100个，而某些地址收到了多达490,000个令牌，这导致社区质疑分销的公平性。

Many people believe that the project's airdrop is intended to create an "illusion of wealth" by driving up the price of coins and then selling them for profit, charging high gas fees, and even locking up some tokens, making it impossible for users to circulate their assets. This practice goes against the original "community first" concept and has been criticized as "harvesting retail investors."

许多人认为，该项目的空调旨在通过提高硬币价格，然后出售盈利，收取高昂的汽油费，甚至锁定一些令牌，使用户无法传播其资产来创造“财富幻想”。这种做法违背了原始的“社区第一”概念，并被批评为“收获散户投资者”。

In summary, the main issues of community rights protection are concentrated in three points:

总而言之，社区权利保护的主要问题集中在三点：

A phased victory for community rights protection?

分阶段的社区权利保护胜利？

After Binance terminated its cooperation with the market maker, the Movement Network Foundation issued a statement saying that the Movement Network Foundation and Movement Labs were unaware of this and chose to cooperate with this market maker because they had supported projects in the Movement ecosystem. At present, the foundation has cut off all relations with the market maker (including ecosystem partnerships) and contacted other major exchanges to inform them of the ongoing investigation.

在Binance终止与做市商的合作之后，运动网络基金会发表声明说，运动网络基金会和运动实验室不知道这一点，并选择与该市做家合作，因为他们支持了运动生态系统中的项目。目前，该基金会切断了与做市商（包括生态系统伙伴关系）的所有关系，并与其他主要交易所联系，以告知他们正在进行的调查。

Throughout this incident, the Movement Network Foundation has actively cooperated with Binance and has pledged to use the funds recovered from MM to repurchase $MOVE on the open market.

在整个事件中，运动网络基金会一直积极合作，并承诺将从MM回收的资金在公开市场上回购$。

Still full of doubts

仍然充满疑问

Although Binance took corresponding measures to punish the project owner in the Move incident, and the community achieved a phased victory, the entire incident is still shrouded in doubt:

尽管Binance采取了相应的措施来惩罚该项目所有者在此举事件中，并且社区取得了分阶段的胜利，但整个事件仍然受到怀疑：

For example, the project had a unilateral dump of tens of millions of dollars in December last year. How could Binance, as a trading platform, not notice it? If it was indeed an operational error, why didn't it take the necessary corrective measures at the first time, but chose to disclose it publicly four months later?

例如，该项目在去年12月有数千万美元的单方面转储。 Binance是一个交易平台，不会注意到它？如果确实是一个操作错误，为什么不第一次采取必要的纠正措施，而是选择四个月后公开披露它呢？

From another perspective, if the violations were indeed caused by the market maker, why didn’t the project party take legal action to hold it accountable? If the market maker took full responsibility, why didn’t it take the initiative to defend itself or provide relevant explanations? These unresolved issues still need further investigation and urgently need transparent responses from both inside and outside the industry.

从另一个角度来看，如果违规确实是由做市商造成的，为什么项目政党不采取法律行动来承担责任？如果做市商承担全部责任，为什么不主动为自己辩护或提供相关解释呢？这些未解决的问题仍然需要进一步的调查，并且迫切需要从行业内外的透明反应。

When the tide goes out, you can see who is swimming naked.

当潮流熄灭时，您可以看到谁在赤裸裸地游泳。

Although this incident has achieved a phased victory, the questions behind it remain unanswered. Protecting the interests of retail investors and ensuring fairness and transparency in the crypto market have always been two dark clouds hanging over web3. Only by thoroughly finding out the truth can the market restore trust and the ideals of Web3 no longer become empty talk.

尽管这一事件取得了分阶段的胜利，但其背后的问题仍未得到解答。保护散户投资者的利益并确保加密市场的公平性和透明度一直是Web3上悬挂的两个乌云。只有彻底发现真相，市场才能恢复信任，而Web3的理想不再成为空白的谈话。