Binance終止了與Movers的做市商Web3Port的合作

昨天，加密行業中討論最多的話題無疑是運動社區捍衛其權利的勝利。

Author: Scof, ChainCatcher

作者：SCOF，ChainCatcher

Yesterday, the most discussed topic in the crypto industry was undoubtedly the victory of the Movement community in defending its rights.

昨天，加密行業中討論最多的話題無疑是運動社區捍衛其權利的勝利。

According to Binance's official announcement, Binance has terminated its cooperation with Movement's market maker web3port and banned it from continuing its market making activities on the platform. The market maker sold a large number of tokens the day after MOVE went online, causing market fluctuations and earning a net profit of about 38 million USDT through this behavior. In order to protect the interests of users, Binance has notified the Movement team and frozen the market maker's earnings, which are planned to be used to compensate users later.

根據Binance的官方宣布，Binance已終止與Movers Mchoys Maker Web3Port的合作，並禁止其繼續在平台上進行市場製作活動。搬家上網後的第二天，做市商出售了大量令牌，從而導致市場波動，並通過這種行為獲得了約3800萬美元的淨利潤。為了保護用戶的利益，Binance已通知了運動團隊並凍結了做市商的收入，該收益計劃用於以後用來補償用戶。

Community members lamented: "As long as the community is united, the torch can illuminate the darkness."

社區成員感嘆：“只要社區團結一致，火炬就可以照亮黑暗。”

However, although this rights protection can be regarded as a phased victory, there are still many doubts behind it, and there are still many unsolved mysteries waiting to be revealed.

但是，儘管這種權利保護可以被視為分階段的勝利，但背後仍然有許多疑問，還有許多未解決的謎團在等待揭示。

From the community controversy

來自社區爭議

Recently, crypto KOL IceFrog published an article titled "Seven Questions to Movement: In the Face of Facts, Please Respond Positively to Community Concerns", which revealed many problems with Movement and attracted widespread attention.

最近，Crypto Kol Icefrog發表了一篇題為“運動的七個問題：面對事實，請對社區的關注做出積極回應”的文章，該文章揭示了許多運動問題並引起了廣泛關注。

According to Rootdata, Movement is a modular framework compatible with Solidity for building and deploying infrastructure, applications, etc. based on the Move programming language in any distributed environment.

根據rootdata的說法，運動是一個模塊化框架，與基於任何分佈式環境中的移動編程語言建立和部署基礎架構，應用程序等的堅固性兼容。

Initially, the $MOVE token airdrop distribution plan attracted a lot of attention, promising to distribute 50%-60% of the tokens to the community. However, in practice, the airdrop window was too short, the distribution ratio was far lower than expected, and the rules were complicated and opaque, which disappointed many participants.

最初，$ MOVE MOVE STOKEN AIRDROP分銷計劃引起了很多關注，承諾將50％-60％的令牌分配給社區。但是，實際上，空調窗口太短，分配比率遠低於預期，規則很複雜且不透明，這使許多參與者感到失望。

Data shows that 98.5% of addresses received less than 100 tokens, while some addresses received as many as 490,000 tokens, which has caused the community to question the fairness of the distribution.

數據表明，98.5％的地址收到的令牌少於100個，而某些地址收到了多達490,000個令牌，這導致社區質疑分銷的公平性。

Many people believe that the project's airdrop is intended to create an "illusion of wealth" by driving up the price of coins and then selling them for profit, charging high gas fees, and even locking up some tokens, making it impossible for users to circulate their assets. This practice goes against the original "community first" concept and has been criticized as "harvesting retail investors."

許多人認為，該項目的空調旨在通過提高硬幣價格，然後出售盈利，收取高昂的汽油費，甚至鎖定一些令牌，使用戶無法傳播其資產來創造“財富幻想”。這種做法違背了原始的“社區第一”概念，並被批評為“收穫散戶投資者”。

In summary, the main issues of community rights protection are concentrated in three points:

總而言之，社區權利保護的主要問題集中在三點：

A phased victory for community rights protection?

分階段的社區權利保護勝利？

After Binance terminated its cooperation with the market maker, the Movement Network Foundation issued a statement saying that the Movement Network Foundation and Movement Labs were unaware of this and chose to cooperate with this market maker because they had supported projects in the Movement ecosystem. At present, the foundation has cut off all relations with the market maker (including ecosystem partnerships) and contacted other major exchanges to inform them of the ongoing investigation.

在Binance終止與做市商的合作之後，運動網絡基金會發表聲明說，運動網絡基金會和運動實驗室不知道這一點，並選擇與該市做家合作，因為他們支持了運動生態系統中的項目。目前，該基金會切斷了與做市商（包括生態系統夥伴關係）的所有關係，並與其他主要交易所聯繫，以告知他們正在進行的調查。

Throughout this incident, the Movement Network Foundation has actively cooperated with Binance and has pledged to use the funds recovered from MM to repurchase $MOVE on the open market.

在整個事件中，運動網絡基金會一直積極合作，並承諾將從MM回收的資金在公開市場上回購$。

Still full of doubts

仍然充滿疑問

Although Binance took corresponding measures to punish the project owner in the Move incident, and the community achieved a phased victory, the entire incident is still shrouded in doubt:

儘管Binance採取了相應的措施來懲罰該項目所有者在此舉事件中，並且社區取得了分階段的勝利，但整個事件仍然受到懷疑：

For example, the project had a unilateral dump of tens of millions of dollars in December last year. How could Binance, as a trading platform, not notice it? If it was indeed an operational error, why didn't it take the necessary corrective measures at the first time, but chose to disclose it publicly four months later?

例如，該項目在去年12月有數千萬美元的單方面轉儲。 Binance是一個交易平台，不會注意到它？如果確實是一個操作錯誤，為什麼不第一次採取必要的糾正措施，而是選擇四個月後公開披露它呢？

From another perspective, if the violations were indeed caused by the market maker, why didn’t the project party take legal action to hold it accountable? If the market maker took full responsibility, why didn’t it take the initiative to defend itself or provide relevant explanations? These unresolved issues still need further investigation and urgently need transparent responses from both inside and outside the industry.

從另一個角度來看，如果違規確實是由做市商造成的，為什麼項目政黨不採取法律行動來承擔責任？如果做市商承擔全部責任，為什麼不主動為自己辯護或提供相關解釋呢？這些未解決的問題仍然需要進一步的調查，並且迫切需要從行業內外的透明反應。

When the tide goes out, you can see who is swimming naked.

當潮流熄滅時，您可以看到誰在赤裸裸地游泳。

Although this incident has achieved a phased victory, the questions behind it remain unanswered. Protecting the interests of retail investors and ensuring fairness and transparency in the crypto market have always been two dark clouds hanging over web3. Only by thoroughly finding out the truth can the market restore trust and the ideals of Web3 no longer become empty talk.

儘管這一事件取得了分階段的勝利，但其背後的問題仍未得到解答。保護散戶投資者的利益並確保加密市場的公平性和透明度一直是Web3上懸掛的兩個烏雲。只有徹底發現真相，市場才能恢復信任，而Web3的理想不再成為空白的談話。