市值: $3.2201T -1.760%
體積(24小時): $157.2287B -25.000%
  • 市值: $3.2201T -1.760%
  • 體積(24小時): $157.2287B -25.000%
  • 恐懼與貪婪指數:
  • 市值: $3.2201T -1.760%
Cryptos
主題
Cryptospedia
資訊
CryptosTopics
影片
Top News
Cryptos
主題
Cryptospedia
資訊
CryptosTopics
影片
bitcoin
bitcoin

$97547.497462 USD

-1.83%

ethereum
ethereum

$2738.851370 USD

0.16%

xrp
xrp

$2.497104 USD

-2.81%

tether
tether

$1.000278 USD

-0.03%

solana
solana

$204.709543 USD

-0.81%

bnb
bnb

$572.155036 USD

-1.67%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999985 USD

0.02%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.264189 USD

0.00%

cardano
cardano

$0.745883 USD

-0.73%

tron
tron

$0.224059 USD

1.20%

chainlink
chainlink

$19.509713 USD

-2.88%

sui
sui

$3.575762 USD

5.78%

avalanche
avalanche

$26.584614 USD

0.99%

stellar
stellar

$0.339104 USD

-2.13%

shiba-inu
shiba-inu

$0.000016 USD

5.06%

加密貨幣新聞文章

由於共識機制設計問題,XRP Ledger在周三初短暫無法使用

2025/02/05 17:28

由於共識機制的設計導致網絡操作暫時停止,因此週三早些時候,XRP Ledger(XRPL)在周三初短暫地無法使用。

由於共識機制設計問題,XRP Ledger在周三初短暫無法使用

The XRP Ledger (XRPL) experienced a brief period of unavailability on Wednesday due to a consensus mechanism design that led to a temporary halt in network operations.

XRP Ledger(XRPL)由於共識機制設計導致網絡操作暫時停止,週三經歷了短暫的不可用。

The incident began when the network's consensus process appeared to be functioning, but validations were not being published, causing the network's ledgers to “drift apart.” In the XRP Ledger, consensus among validators is crucial for updating the ledger with new transactions. If validators cannot agree on which transactions to include in the next ledger version, the network cannot move forward.

事件始於網絡的共識過程似乎正在運行,但尚未發布驗證,導致網絡的分類帳“分裂”。在XRP分類帳中,驗證者之間的共識對於通過新交易更新分類帳至關重要。如果驗證者無法就下一個分類帳版本中包含哪些交易達成共識,則網絡將無法前進。

A “drift” in this context indicates that while the consensus protocol was technically running, validations (or confirmations of transaction sets) were not being published. At least one validator operator manually intervened to reset the network's consensus to a previously validated ledger state, although the network seemed to have rectified the problem independently, according to Ripple CTO David Schwarz in a X post following the incident.

在這種情況下,“漂移”表明,儘管在技術上運行了共識協議,但尚未發布驗證(或交易集的確認)。根據Ripple CTO David Schwarz在事件後的X帖子中的說法,至少有一個手動介入的驗證器手動介入將網絡的共識重置為先前驗證的分類帳狀態,儘管該網絡似乎已經獨立糾正了問題。

“It's likely that servers refused to send validations precisely because they knew something was wrong,” Schwarz said, “and wanted to make sure no server accepted a ledger as fully validated when they couldn't be sure the network would retain and eventually agree on that ledger.

施瓦茨說:“服務器可能拒絕正好發送驗證,因為他們知道某些問題是錯誤的,並且希望確保在無法確定網絡會保留並最終同意的情況下,沒有服務器接受該分類帳。那分類帳。

“One possible failure mode for XRPL is if all the validators think something's wrong with the network, all refuse to send any validations, and then there's no chatter to let the network reconverge. This is the 'silent network' failure,” Schwarz added.

“ XRPL的一種可能的故障模式是,如果所有驗證者都認為網絡有問題,所有驗證者都拒絕發送任何驗證,然後就沒有聊天的網絡重新調整。這是“無聲網絡”故障,” Schwarz補充說。

No assets were at risk during the downtime, with XRP prices largely in line with broader bitcoin and altcoin movements.

在停機時間內,沒有資產有風險,XRP價格很大程度上符合更廣泛的比特幣和山寨幣的運輸。

免責聲明:info@kdj.com

The information provided is not trading advice. kdj.com does not assume any responsibility for any investments made based on the information provided in this article. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and it is highly recommended that you invest with caution after thorough research!

If you believe that the content used on this website infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately (info@kdj.com) and we will delete it promptly.

2025年02月06日 其他文章發表於